
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A complaint filed with the Ethics Commission attempts to draw a closer connection between a controversial supervisor and a committee supporting a June ballot measure and alleges violations of campaign-finance laws less than three weeks before voters head to the polls.
Lawyers for Lennar Corp., the developer tapped for efforts to redevelop the Bayview-Hunters Point neighborhood, filed the 82-page complaint. It alleges a series of violations involving Supervisor Chris Daly — an outspoken critic of Mayor Gavin Newsom — and his efforts to win over voters to support Proposition F on the June 3 ballot.
That ballot measure would require 50 percent of the housing created in the redevelopment of Bayview-Hunters Point to be offered at below-market rate.
Its critics, including members of Newsom’s administration, say Proposition F would kill the current redevelopment plan — which is on the ballot as Proposition G — for the southeastern section of San Francisco.
Among the allegations in the complaint is that the Bayview Committee for Affordable Housing should be registered as a “candidate controlled committee” in Daly’s name, not as a “general purpose committee.”
Registering the group as a candidate-controlled committee would impose a number of stricter regulations on the committee when it comes to contributions and reporting, the complaint says.
“The disclosure of Supervisor Daly’s control over [the committee] is clearly critical to a fully informed electorate,” the complaint says.
Daly dismissed the complaint as an election tactic.
“I do not have proponent control,” he said. “I am trying to support the committee with fundraising. I do not have control of the committee.”
He acknowledged that rules requiring registration as a candidate-controlled committee are “very loose.”
Daly said that Lennar’s own polling found Prop. F to be popular.
“I think they are trying to attach my negatives to Prop. F to bring down its popularity,” he said.
The complaint alleges that Daly’s activities — from helping to author the initiative to loaning money to the committee — is evidence it should be designated a candidate-controlled committee. Material such as mailers could be “disseminated without legally required identifying information and prohibited contributions may be made by unsuspecting donors,” it says.
Daly said that even if the committee was registered as a candidate-controlled committee, “I don’t believe the Bayview committee has received any donations that would be restricted.”
He said the committee raised and spent less than $10,000, compared with the more than $2.23 million behind Proposition G.
Proposition G would authorize Lennar to see through a major redevelopment project in Bayview-Hunters Point that would include 10,000 new homes, parks, business space and a new 49ers stadium, if the team elects to stay in San Francisco. Lennar has said it will include 32 to 35 percent of housing at below-market rate. The campaign in support of Proposition G is being largely funded by Lennar.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:28 PM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
3:34 PM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
11:15 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
9:03 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
8:37 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
8:05 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
5:14 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008
re: "Developer sets sights on Daly"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Imagine that, Mayor Newsom's long, elegant fingers all over a Lennar Corp. situation? Like that would be a surprise? Why does a Miami-based developer have so much clout in San Francisco anyway?
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A.Goodman @ PRO said:
Lennar homes threatened to back out of the agreement if they were made to build rental housing. The drive for "affordability" over the issue of providing adequate options in terms of development is what is required to get these large scale projects balanced. Demand 50-50 housing and rental housing. The need to create equal development of new rental units so that the housing stock of rentals softens the current barrage of pied-a-terres in the sky. The development also ignores the need for direct access to transportation for the 10,000+ units. The 3rd st. lightrail should have been looped around the Schlage lock factory through candlestick development and stadium & on back up to the route north with and intermodal at or near the caltrains station. The lack of fore-sight, and development savy by the city only leads us further down a bad developer driven push that kills neighborhoods & the prior livability for seniors, artists, and families. We need to clean up the bay-view, not clean-out
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I see Gavin Newsom's long, elegant fingers all up in this morass.
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's be realistic. No developer will touch that area with a 10 foot pole if affordable housing is earmarked for 50%. People aren't building out of the goodness of their hearts. They have to make money out of it too. Chris Daly & cohorts are a bunch of idealistic idiots. After Prop F is passed you can bet those dummies will abandon the denizens of Bayview and sucker punch some other City residents w/ their pie in the sky crap!
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Native San Franciscan said:
If Proposition F passes the Bayview will be condemned to remain a crime infested, run down, dilapidated neighborhood for the next 30 years. I fail to see what is progressive about keeping people trapped in squalor & dilapidated conditions. Chris Daly himself acknowledges that if Proposition F passes it will kill any housing development in the Bayview. A 50 percent affordability threshold has NEVER been accomplished anywhere because it’s just not doable. At least Proposition G offers the hope of 2500 affordable homes and some real improvements in the quality of life for people in the Bayview. What does Proposition F offer – NOTHING? Yes on G, No on F.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Chris Daly has various ideas for the City from time to time, but he should not ever be involved in any issues that impedes an individual's access to housing here in the City.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes of course this is an important issue. I would guess that if the situation was reversed Daly would have been all over it like a cheap suit.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is too bad that our mayor backs the Lennar private development of the waterfront. The navy site has not been cleared of toxic waste, and new development by Lennar promises lots of new jewel box condos, right next to $34 million dollars of new voter funded landscaping. Lennar's waterfront project got included in the SFR+P Bond measure that was passed, and they want MORE. Does another SF neighborhood kick out the residents so that more well heeled urbane citizens can move in? I say no. Support Chris Daly's bid to let Hunters Point folks keep their neighborhood, with or without Lennar. And, by the way, who do you think will fund the over $1.5 billion infrastructure that will be needed by Lennar? I'm guessing we will. How about giving that $34 million of bond money back to SF Rec + Park to fix existing structures and keep the skeleton crew they now have? Mayor Newsom, how about all that concern you have for San Francisco families? Is it how to get their homes, how to privatize the ci
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wasn't this filed by the same folks who claimed Newsom didn't control the ballot committee opposing Question Time in the last election, even though he was the chief beneficiary, fundraiser, and opponent? Perhaps Ethics should start by looking at that election. Typical lawyer trick
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree