Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A parcel tax aimed at enticing new teachers to stay in San Francisco’s public schools also includes a bevy of funds for school technology, charter schools, “think tanks” and grants that would encourage schools to explore new ways to help students succeed.
Voters will have their say June 3 on Proposition A, a $198 tax on commercial and residential parcels that would raise an estimated $28.8 million annually for the San Francisco Unified School District. It requires two-thirds approval.
Roughly 71 percent of the tax revenues would boost teacher salaries, bonuses and other incentives, according to Dennis Kelly, head of the United Educators of San Francisco.
The remainder would be used by district leaders for a variety of projects, including a 13 percent set-aside for new computers and the staff to keep them running, according to Superintendent Carlos Garcia.
“Right now, we might have one person to maintain 2,000 computers,” Garcia said.
The district would also use its share to provide grants to schools that develop new strategies for helping low-performing students thrive, and to research districtwide innovation, according to Garcia.
“[Prop. A] would help us create a ‘think tank’ to study what we need to do differently,” Garcia said.
Another $1 million would go to the district’s nine charter schools. If it passes, Prop. A would be the first public-school parcel tax to fund charter schools, according to Nick Driver, general manager for the California Charter School Association.
“San Francisco sees this as new money coming in to the system, and charter schools are part of the system — they’re serving San Francisco kids,” Driver said.
The lion’s share of the tax would increase teacher salaries, particularly for new teachers, while providing bonuses to educators willing to work in low-performing schools or hard-to-staff subjects, such as science and mathematics.
Right now, San Francisco’s low pay makes it a training ground for teachers who move on as they gain experience, leaders said. With Prop. A, a starting teacher’s salary would rise from $47,478 to $52,250.
“It’s pretty frustrating for my husband and me to live in a city with such a high cost of living,” said Andrea Peterson, a second-grade teacher at Argonne Elementary School who has taught in the district for three years. “We don’t want to move, but it’s becoming harder and harder.”
In addition, the tax would provide teachers with $2,500 bonuses after four and eight years, another $2,000 for teaching at a challenging school and $1,000 for teaching in a “hard-to-fill subject area.”
“You can’t just say that this is a bounty for working in the worst places,” Kelly said. “This is extra pay for the extra work teachers perform in these schools.”
Revenues would be allocated to improve salaries, support professional development, fund technology needs and boost charter-school funding.
» 41%: Teacher salary increases
» 20.8%: Teacher bonuses, coaching for low-performing teachers
» 9.5%: Ongoing teacher education
» 13.1%: Technology, computers and IT staff
» 7.4%: Salary increases for other employees
» 3.5%: Charter schools
» 2.6%: Innovation, research and development
» 1.8%: Support and materials for teacher education
» 0.3%: Oversight



Comments from Examiner Readers
12:17 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Tax could beef up teacher salaries, tech"
Report as inappropriate
2:31 AM MST on Tue., Aug. 28, 2007
re: "S.F. cabbies criticize transit measure"
Report as inappropriate
10:06 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 27, 2007
re: "S.F. cabbies criticize transit measure"
Report as inappropriate
A.Goodman @ PRO said:
Mr. Garcia should respond to the sale of the 700 Font School site, which was the one public site within walking distance to the largest rental neighborhood. It was a sustainable opportunity spoiled by improper notification,& inclusion of neighborhood groups, in the decision. The recent SF Business Times notes the sale of 8 more sites for 110 million apprx. value, with possible 900 units of housing to be created, while the money is noted for tech innovatinos. What is the fore-sight? the vision for future kids & family growth in the city? The expenditures are out-weighing the proper and timely creation of new schools. Dianne Feinstein is now a "hot" school with numerous families trying to get in. The sale of a public school site is improper, the value can never be realy recouped. The sale is a short-sighted vision of the SFUSD's future. Only Eric Mar, saw the value in the schools and their location. To allow further bonds,&proposals with no direct oversight of the expenditure worries me
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So the cabbies will be getting paid like Muni Drivers? They should be rejoicing.
141 agree | 128 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
haf devil said:
as unreliable muni is to the city of san francisco and now an attempt to merge it with the taxi industry? this is way crazy. somebody is trying to force a business out of business. no way, jose.
141 agree | 144 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree