CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 4 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 24 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 44 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 50 mins ago
Examiner.com // 2 hrs 15 mins ago
Daily News // 3 hrs ago
Daily News // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Review: There will be blood on their hands
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Elliot Ruiz plays a Marine involved in the headline-making 2005 deaths of 24 Iraqis in “Battle for Haditha.”
(Courtesy photo)
Elliot Ruiz plays a Marine involved in the headline-making 2005 deaths of 24 Iraqis in “Battle for Haditha.”

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The Iraq war films, they keep on coming, and with the arrival of “Battle for Haditha,” this under-seen collection obtains one of its finer dramas.

British filmmaker Nick Broomfield, known for making self-assertive, celebrity-oriented documentaries such as “Kurt and Courtney” and “Biggie and Tupac,” performs a successful shift in gears with this verité-style consideration of the headline-making incident in which U.S. Marines massacred 24 Iraqi civilians after an insurgent-planted bomb killed a fellow marine.

The film works as both an art-house suspense offering and a serious indictment of the war mentality.

Broomfield, along with two official co-writers and a mostly nonprofessional cast, combines fact, speculation and fancy in dramatizing the events surrounding the above-mentioned slaughter, which occurred at a Haditha, Iraq, residential complex in November 2005.

He presents ripples of war-zone experience and anxiety, with a focus on three groups: U.S. Marines, Iraqi insurgents and Haditha villagers.

The chief protagonist is the fact-inspired Cpl. Ramirez (played by former Marine Elliot Ruiz), the physically and emotionally scarred leader of the Marine squad responsible for the bloodbath. He revs up his men to view all Iraqis as potential terrorists and to do horrible things. He has nightmares.

We also meet the two bomb-planting insurgents. While not fond of their al-Qaeda bosses, they dislike the Americans (whose elimination of the Iraqi army cost one of them his job) more.

Additional characters include a klatch of village women who discuss how to handle their knowledge of the explosives planted in their midst.

As is generally the case when inexperienced actors tackle emotional material and improvise dialogue, things sometimes get clunky. The drama isn’t as powerfully tragic as similarly themed works by Paul Greengrass or Michael Winterbottom, or allegorical Iranian fare like “Turtles Can Fly.” Documentarians Errol Morris and Alex Gibney have more effectively examined how current military mind-sets warp soldiers’ decency sensibilities to appalling degrees.

But it’s still a worthy little war drama.

Lacking the wearisome American insistence on presenting subjects as either good guys or baddies, and displaying none of his prior tendency to insert himself obtrusively into his films, Broomfield draws us into credible scenarios, builds suspense and delivers realistic characters whose flawed humanity keeps us believing.

And if the ending gets gooey, it is an isolated misstep. The 90 or so minutes that precede it add up to a satisfying and convincing look at how the Haditha tradedy could and did happen.

CREDITS

Battle for Haditha (three stars)

Starring Elliot Ruiz, Yasmine Hanani, Falah Ibrahim, Andrew McLaren

Written by Nick Broomfield, Marc Hoeferlin, Anna Telford

Directed by Nick Broomfield

Not rated

Running time 1 hour, 33 minutes

People who read this also read:

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:55 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

Examiner Reader said:
"Why, after an hour of pratfalls, try to reinvent Hancock as a somber second coming of the Caped Crusader? I like the idea of a disgraced superhero struggling to rehabilitate his image." This specific comment leads me to believe that you missed the point, and that you would rather drop a clever phrase in your own creation, your critique, than do your job as a critic and evaluate fully what was given to you (instead of "what if?") By the way, "Caped Crusader" is a name most often attributed to Bruce Wayne's alter ego, not the "aww, gee" squeaky clean Superman (which I believe is what you inferred). The ending, which focused on the familiar comic themes, of self sacrifice and the powers of the ordinary were very satisfying for this comic fan. The questions left unanswered in the movie are what number one issues are made of. I have a complaint: more of the title's credit should have been given to Bateman and Theron in my opinion. Hancock, albeit misnamed, was a great introduction.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:23 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Review: A profile of a ‘Gonzo’ guy"

Gone. So? said:
So many seemingly brilliant alcoholic/addicts whose works became extremely popular through the mass media during the latter half of the twentieth century have had such an endelible influence on American culture that by now you'd expect one of them to perhaps become President of the United States. Oh yeah, right, one already has.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

MrHyphy said:
Hancock is a good movie end of story.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:59 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
just came back from seeing a movie that i thought would be great but it WAS SOME GARBAGE DON'T WAIST UR TIME OR MONEY VIA MOVIE THEATRE OR DVD

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
M. Knight is the modern day equivalent to Alfred Hithcock. I completely disagree with this review and her review of his last two movies. The Village was one his best movies, and The Lady in the Water was also a great movie. Some people just don't have minds capable of seeing outside the box and wondering what if. Case in point, Sally Kline.

5 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
The movie kicked ass!

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
You, sir, are an idiot of the highest order.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
This was a great movie with a great story line. But hey what would you expect from a critic.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "Review: The girls are back in town"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms. Katz, You are quite the bitch for revealing that "Big stands Carrie up at the = alter"! Gwen Evans

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Review: Goin’ back to ‘Indiana’"

Examiner Reader said:
wow the review of the new Indiana Jones movie really over rates it--unlike the others it is ALL style and no substance. the movie has a return of karen allen but then does nothing with her; and what is this===Happy Days meets the X Files? it maybe but isnt an Indiana Jones movie.

9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
Cont...With regards to Battle for Haditha (see below): This 'rampage' point of view has been disproven. (3) There is evidence that these Marines were used as scapegoats to appease a liberal media and Anti-War sentiments in the Senate and govt like Murtha. There is evidence of undue command influence in the hubris investigation that ensued. The investigation was unprecedented. These Marines were asked to make split moment decisions under duress that most of us would be hard pressed to do differently under similar circumstances. Interesting fact from the think tank AEI: A poll of tribal leaders across Iraq was recently conducted about US elections and who they would vote for, McCain, Obama, or Clinton. A majority would vote for John McCain but in Al Anbar where Haditha occurred, the tribal leaders want to re-elect George Bush. The Iraqi leaders greatly fear us leaving b/c that would ensure the return of the henchmen who murdered and terrorized the locals. They want peace and stabilit

7 agree | 17 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
With regards to Battle for Haditha: To imply this movie is an accurate representation of the Haditha incident is misguided and disingenuous. This movie is far from an accurate representation of what occurred but conjecture based on misinformation. The truth of what occurred and mistakes made are coming out now. So how did the director possibly know what really happened when he made this movie? These are what we do know now: (1) The incident was a set up from insurgents who were looking to create an Iraq massacre for political gain and as part of their information operations. Al Qaeda filmed the carnage and the American and world media appeased them. (2) There is evidence from drones that there were insurgents fleeing from the buildings the Marines cleared. The Marines who cleared the buildings were not targeting civilians and were following orders. Their intentions were to ensure their own safety and not from a desire to take revenge or go on some kind of rampage. This 'rampage' poin

10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:29 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: C.S. Lewis’ second coming"

Examiner Reader said:
Hey, the comment I left below was supposed to be for "Speed Racer". Don't aske me how it ended up here! Anyway, I saw this movie too and, even though I liked it, can someone explain to me how those trebuchet/catapult devices worked? Also, what about mounted soldiers using crossbows with arrows? Don't crossbows need to be placed on the gound to be reloaded with a bolt?

6 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "No need for hollow, horribly acted ‘Speed’"

Examiner Reader said:
I have heard a lot of trash about this movie, but I have to disagree. I loved it. The part most people miss is that it stays true to the cartoon that inspired it. Sure, it is hokie, far-fetched and dated, but that's just the way the cartoon was! Besides, this show has a lot of action and happy ending. Who wouldn't like that?

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Review: Terrorism enters stoned age"

Examiner Reader said:
Pretty spot-on review, but critics (even Asian Ameircan critics, who are falling over themselves to celebrate the fact that Asians are starring in a mainstream hit movie without being, well, you know, ASIAN) including Examiner's are missing he huge red flag od sexism that permrates both ,ovies but this one even more so. Yeah, so that's part and parcel of the juvenile, hormone-drenched guy genre, but it doesn't excuse the over-the-top nature of this movie's juvenalia. It almsot negates both the empowring of Asian Americans AND the bits of smart political commentary casually tossed off throughout the dialogue. And BTW, Rossiter, there are no hyphens in "Indian American" and "Korean American."

9 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Nights’ can leave you feeling blue"

Melisa said:
The movie was alright - I enjoyed all the cinematic imagery, but I esp. loved the music in the film. I just bought the soundtrack and I can't stop listening to it - really great!

22 agree | 25 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Review: Caught in the net of 'Spiderwick’"

Examiner Reader said:
I read the books and I am an adult female that enjoys a good fantasy book without romance in it. Yes, the books are a bit different, but the story line moved quite well even though it was much different from the books. Well done. My whole family watched it and it was entertaining to us.

103 agree | 96 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:38 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Review: ‘Lions for Lambs’ more like medicine than a movie"

mandela said:
"Lions for lambs" is a colossal bore.

238 agree | 208 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
Pirates of the Caribbean(all 3)have to be the best movies i have ever seen. This is an extremely harsh review of a completely AWEsome movie! I mean come on there had to be something this reviewer liked about it.

285 agree | 276 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:30 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 2, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
RE: POTC3 - I found it to be highly entertaining-which is what a movie is supposed to be! Hey, some liked it, some didn't - so what? Johnny Depp made all 3 movies fun to watch (he IS very easy on the eyes)! A lot of people loved it - hence its popularity. Fantasy pictures are fun - much needed in today's world. There are many "serious" movies with plots so convoluted a person would leave the theater confused. With POTC a person could leave the theater laughing (hang the plots) and wanting more. I think sometimes even critics don't know what they want in a movie. But, you can bet your bottom dollar that if there's a POTC4 it'll be a hit - again, hang the "plots", bring on the characters and the FUN! And if the first 3 didn't float your boat then stay home!

314 agree | 307 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:18 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007 re: "Unbalanced, powerful ‘Sicko’ a movie that matters"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree with Sally Kline's assessment of Michael Moore's documentary... the film left me thoroughly disgusted with the American healthcare system and disenchanted with the ways my fellow citizens and our policy makers are influenced by the almighty dollar. It's sad and pathetic, and no solution seems in sight...

568 agree | 379 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Jackie said:
I love4 you Johnny and please make more films with you as the pirate I think you are the greattest

585 agree | 359 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.16 seconds)