
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Washington, D.C. (Map, News) - Schools Chancellor Michelle Rhee’s axing of dozens of school principals was “random and arbitrary,” according to the union representing the school leaders.
In a harshly worded letter to Rhee, Aona Jefferson, executive vice president of the Council of School Officers, said the firing decisions were made in a “factual vacuum” and says that union leaders are “distressed by the random and arbitrary” way that principals were let go.
“Such treatment is simply unacceptable,” the letter continues. “When ... decisions are made without reference to an individual’s performance evaluation, the entire evaluation process is rendered a mock and a sham.”
Rhee began informing principals about a week ago that they would have to leave by the end of June.
Some principals learned of their fates from meetings with their instructional superintendents. Yet none have been given explanation, Jefferson said.
“I’m disappointed that there are people on the list that have been helpful to children,” she told The Examiner. “They deserve more than just being kicked to the curb.”
Rhee’s office refuses to give out a complete list of the principals who were not asked back, and her spokeswoman Mafara Hobson would not comment on the letter Thursday.
In Jefferson’s estimation, the number of fired principals is somewhere around 35, with a large portion coming from closing or restructuring schools.
One affected leader, Park View Elementary School Principal Charles Harden, has been in the D.C. Public Schools system for 29 years. Harden started as a teacher and moved up the ranks.
He told The Examiner that during his nine years leading Park View the school hit federal standards every time but once.
This year he expects the school to meet required benchmarks again, he said.
During his tenure, Park View was noted for its exceptional handling of special education, he said.
Based on those accomplishments, Harden said he was stunned to lose his job. “My track record has been good,” he said. “Everyone knew these changes were coming, but I didn’t think I’d be one [of the principals].”
dlevitz@dcexaminer.com
# 3,506 of 7,115 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
People who read this also read:
|
|
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:56 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 21, 2008 re: "District's school union slams Rhee’s firing of principals"
Report as inappropriate
5:30 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 9, 2008
re: "District's school union slams Rhee’s firing of principals"
Report as inappropriate
3:25 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "District's school union slams Rhee’s firing of principals"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
It is really sad that the perception of the principals that were dismissed is due to poor performance. The actual truth is that most of them were close to retirement and really had the knowledge and certification that the chancellor herself lacks. That's why she is called a chancellor and not a superentendent. She also does not perform the duties of a superintendent. She lacks the skills. she has the gift of gab however, but talk is cheap. Now that she has admitted that test scores will be slow to improve, she's already looking at her failure. More importantly, her lack of leadership will not allow her to cultivate the new crop that's coming as the replacements. When she leaves and she will, her baggage will be heavy. She has surrounded herself with failures from Cleveland. Unfortunately, when they leave and they will some other school district will be victimized. When will this sick cycle stop?
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope that the principals' union moves quickly on this. I teach at a school where a principal has been dismissed, and we are all sick about it, because the principal was an excellent educational leader. To refuse to comment is tantamount to dictatorship. We want our principal back!
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader of the Examiner said:
I am your waitress [chancelleor] for this evening...there are 35 items [principals] on the menu that will not be available this evening and sorry there are no substitutions. I will give you time to review the menu and comeback for your order...by the way if you want some water...go get it yourself. I dare you to complain because the owner [mayor] of the restaurant [DCPS] has guaranteed me this job until he leaves the business within two years
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree