CBS2-KCAL // 50 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 10 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 30 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 36 mins ago
Examiner.com // 2 hrs 1 min ago
Daily News // 3 hrs ago
Daily News // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
CBS2-KCAL // 3 hrs ago
 
   
New assault category considered for attacking D.C. guards with bodily fluids
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Washington, D.C. (Map, News) - D.C. Jail inmates have attacked guards with bodily fluids nearly three dozen times in two years, and the U.S. attorney’s failure to demand stout punishment has provided little deterrent to end the assaults, a District official said Thursday.

Inmates “commonly” use body waste to strike staff in the face, causing injury, emotional trauma and potentially serious illness, Corrections Director Devon Brown told the D.C. Council’s public safety committee. The panel is considering legislation, requested by Mayor Adrian Fenty, that would create a separate assault category for such acts, requiring an additional prison sentence of 180 days.

The U.S. Attorney’s Office prosecuted 24 of 33 incidents of alleged assault with bodily fluids between 2006 and 2007, Brown said. The sanctions have been weak, he added, though he refused to provide details.

“While the rate of conviction has been high, the penalties for these cases have frequently been nullified by plea bargains or guilty findings with no sanctions whatsoever, thus providing no deterrence or negative impact toward future assaultive displays by inmates,” Brown said.

Channing Phillips, spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s Office, said each case of attack by bodily fluid is investigated. But if there’s no resulting bodily injury, he said, the crime cannot be prosecuted as anything more than misdemeanor simple assault, already punishable by a 180-day jail term.

“You can’t plead down a misdemeanor,” Phillips said.

Councilman Phil Mendelson, chair of the committee, said he was “sympathetic” to the plight of guards and agreed the acts are “heinous,” but he questioned why the bill was necessary. D.C. law already covers simple and felony assault, he said.

“If it’s already illegal, we don’t accomplish anything by making it illegal again,” Mendelson said.

But John Rosser, vice chairman of the D.C. jail guard union, argued that protection “in the form of severe deterring penalties” is needed to send a message “that it is not open season on corrections officers.”

Brown said that most states, including Maryland, have had the “wisdom” to create “separate and distinct laws that govern the uniqueness of the correctional environment.”

The bill also would shift responsibility for prosecuting such cases to the D.C. attorney general, a provision that may not be legal, as the city’s Home Rule charter prohibits the District from changing the scope of the U.S. attorney’s responsibilities.

mneibauer@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:03 PM MST on Fri., May. 23, 2008 re: "Advocates call D.C. Jail juvenile lock-down 'inhumane'"

Examiner Reader said:
Liz Ryan...You might suggest to the knucklehead in charge of the DC jail that the definition of "Time Out" is "a disciplinary technique for one who misbehaves and is sent to be alone for a few minutes so as to calm down before returning to their original status." Some would define the head of corrections actions as "Time In" simply because he has the power....E L Dunlap, CEO National Partnership for Juvenile Services.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:53 PM MST on Sun., May. 18, 2008 re: "Advocates call D.C. Jail juvenile lock-down 'inhumane'"

Examiner Reader said:
How about sending these kids to the juvenile detention center for dc, Oakhill , until they have been found guilty of the crime as an adult.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:22 AM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008 re: "Advocates call D.C. Jail juvenile lock-down 'inhumane'"

DC Resident said:
Here we go again these liberal civil do gooders, these juveniles commited adult crimes,that is the reason they are in there in the first place,the majority of these juveniles have no respect for laws,other people rights or adherence to rules and regulation. The only thing that get through their thick head is specific displine as a consequence for their actions. What the goverment should do is let those Civil do gooders spend a few days inside working with those knuckle heads, I am willing to bet there attitude will change if they don't get scared after having been punch or body fluids tossed on them before there first day on the job is complete. Arm chair quarterbacks are the best in the game until they actually have to play the game.Been there done that.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:42 AM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008 re: "New assault category considered for attacking D.C. guards with bodily fluids"

DC Resident said:
DC proscution of Inmates who assault Correctional officers and citizens who assault police Officers, by the then Cooperation Council office and know the US Attorney Office have always been weak, no other juridiction is as pathetic as DC in prosecuting these cases However,they will spend thousands of dollars to prosecute any Correctional or Police Office who hit back after being assaulted. The problem with DC and continues to this date, their is no deterrent to the criminals and is one of the main reason crime in this city continues at a high level.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)