Montgomery County Council OKs cut to property tax
Article History
This is the latest version.

Montgomery County (Map, News) - The Montgomery County Council has approved a small cut to the county’s the property tax rate, but savings to residents could still be wiped out when council members consider the size of the year’s tax credit package.

Council members voted 7-1 to cut the property tax rate by 2.2 percent, but leaders reminded a packed auditorium that the council will review the entire budget Thursday and can make adjustments. While homeowners need to wait for decisions on tax credits to know exactly how this will affect them, businesses, which aren’t eligible for homeowner credits, will benefit regardless of the final package.

Councilman George Leventhal said the county’s efforts in recent years to use credits to shift the tax burden from homeowners to commercial property owners is noble, but will eventually affect residents anyhow.

“There is a point at which every tax is going to be passed through,” Leventhal said. “If a movie theater is going to pay far higher property taxes, we’ll pay for it in tickets.”

Montgomery County has been working to shore up its commercial base since new state taxes threatened to drive businesses and business owners into Virginia.

County Executive Ike Leggett’s budget proposal included an 8.3 percent increase in the property tax rate, the largest in 20 years, but came with a $1,014 tax credit that he said would protect residents who own average and less expensive property.

Leggett slammed the council’s decision to cut the tax rate.

“The average person won’t concentrate on the rate but what the actual tax bill is,” Leggett said. “I am afraid you will see for some people in the middle and below a huge, huge increase compared to what I was doing.”

Councilman Marc Elrich was the lone vote against cutting the tax rate, said he ran an analysis on some area businesses to see how much they’d save.

“There were 110 huge commercial properties that will save $2 million,” Elrich said. “Who’s being protected here, the poor renters or the guys who own the big car companies and office buildings?”

kmiller@dcexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:46 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel officials puzzled by county budget proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm glad we're in Catholic school so we don't have to deal with this BS

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

7:36 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel officials puzzled by county budget proposal"

Examiner Reader said:
Are the county employees having their raised funded because they met performance goals and individual evaluations? Are the teacher raises not being funded because they failed to meet performance goals and do they really have individual performance objectives? Are all schools being successful in the county? Are non teaching employees under performing per citizens of the county? Perhaps these questions when answered might explain to the school system why they have been mesured and found wanting.

2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:50 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel officials puzzled by county budget proposal"

Politics! said:
It is all about politics. School Board is sitting on so many properties used for nothing. And they have been sitting on them for ages. If they are sincere that they are so worried about children, they should just sell them and turn it into funds for our children, rather then expecting Leopold raise the property taxes. If some people are willing to pay more taxes they should just go and donate them to the school board. But I do not want my taxes to be raised for a school system managed so poorly. Indeed many people agree with me via their actions. In Annapolis, the number of students going to private schools is more than the number students going to public schools. In other words many parents WHO are managing our county are not sending their kids to aacps. It is the superintendent's job to find alternative solutions rather than causing chaos within the county via attacking Mr. Leopold.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:35 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008 re: "Anne Arundel officials puzzled by county budget proposal"

Another AA County taxpayer said:
Perhaps Mr. Leopold doesn't agree with the Superintendent's Plan for redistricting for the new elementary school in Crofton (identified as Gambrills in this article). It was built to relieve crowding at Crofton schools, yet the Plan actually leaves several Crofton schools over capacity. The Plan will also remove 200 Odenton children from their community school. It just doesn't make any sense!

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)