Baltimore City's top police lawyer joins O’Malley administration under fire
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - Weeks after a union of black police officers called for her resignation, Baltimore City police’s top lawyer quit Wednesday to take a high-ranking job in the administration of Gov. Martin O’Malley.

Karen Hornig, the police department’s chief legal counsel, said clashes with opponents had nothing to do with her decision.

“When great opportunities come along, you have to take them,” she said, adding that working for the police department was a “fabulous job.”

Hornig will become an associate deputy to Insurance Commissioner Ralph Tyler, a former Baltimore City solicitor.

Baltimore Police Commissioner Frederick Bealefeld said Hornig would be hard to replace.

“Public safety isn’t just about police with badges and guns,” he said. “She played a very important part in making Baltimore safe.”

In March, the Vanguard Justice Society, a black officers’ group, called for Hornig’s ouster after a black sergeant was charged administratively with a sex offense prosecutors say he couldn’t have committed. The sergeant’s lawyer alleged Hornig orchestrated the false charges as retribution for his refusal to drop a $1.5 million defamation lawsuit against the police department.

Hornig, the department’s top lawyer for two years, said she’s worked hard to avoid settling suits against the agency.

“I’m proud of the work we’ve done here,” she said. “When I took over we had eight jury trials [a year]. Last year, we have 26 -- and we won 64 percent of them.”

Such victories were difficult in a city where juries often are biased against police, she said.

“We’ve been a whole lot more reluctant to settle cases,” she said. “You’re not going to win any cases if you don’t try them. It isn’t always an easy sell in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City. We’re two touchdowns behind before they flip the coin to start the game.”

lbroadwater@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:32 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 12, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

Captital Offense said:
Will MTA being monitored by "terrorist-trained homeland security specialists" "concentrating on our most vulnerable areas,” make fare evasion a capital offense? Will sleeping in Muni now be a federal crime?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:45 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "San Carlos police escape staff reductions ­— for now"

Examiner Reader said:
It is true that San Carlos lost 5 officers, and refuses to let people know the truth why they were fired. Research the 8 million dollar lawsuit San Carlos had to pay out! Also how was it possible that one of the officers that were caught in the middle of the lies and cover up exempt from prosecution and was able to take a new job as chief of Benicia police dept? Obstruction of justice = NEW JOB AS CHIEF OF POLICE IN ANOTHER CITY? JUST WHAT DID SHE HAVE TO DO TO PULL THAT OFF ???

42 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:19 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

L. Amiot said:
I hope that you are not a sworn policeman, Mr. maninblue. The real men in blue are intelligent and erudite. They know how to spell and punctuate a sentence. They also know the difference between vane and vain.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:14 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

maninblue said:
I hope mr. L amiot, you are not using his name in vane. The real layne amiot was a true gentleman and a class sgt in the police department.. i hope its just a coincidence

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

L. Amiot said:
There goes young Newsom meddling with the Police Dept again. Now we are losing 2 well trained, educated, and experienced, veteran law enforcement leaders from PUC and MTA because young Newsom thinks it's best....for his image. Public Safety is at risk with this interference and micromanaging. This goes well with his idea of planting broccoli and carrots in Civic Center Plaza. If he wants the books to reflect a smaller payroll, he should dump some of the advisors he’s brought onboard since his surprising reelection. This young silverspoon Marinite has made a mockery of our city with his immaturity and narcissism. Now he wants to be our Governor?

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:26 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "San Carlos police escape staff reductions ­— for now"

Examiner Reader said:
San Carlos Police ..... USELESS IDIOTS !

98 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 AM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Baltimore City's top police lawyer joins O’Malley administration under fire"

Examiner Reader said:
What logic! With Hornig at the helm Baltimore City loses as many jury trials a year as they used to have altogether. Only in government would an official point to that as victory.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Joint meeting would address club hubbub"

Examiner Reader said:
I don't know anyone who moved to North Beach because they thought it was going to be a quiet neigbhorhood?

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:29 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree that there is an issue (City drivers are horrible, generally some of the most inept I've seen), but the sting operation isn't the best way to go about this. Observe that a scooter got hit, and regardless of the motive, I sure would've been livid had that been me. Further, I ride a motorcycle (and live in the area) - I do not stop for pedestrians unless they are actually in the road (this may infuriate people or not technically meet the law; I intend to check now whether you must stop for people not actually already crossing) because I know I'm a sitting duck at that point, and I observe by the minute just how attentive SF drivers are. Footnote - don't believe for a second that hands-free phones make one whit of difference.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:17 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
24/7 vehicles speed down this stretch of Lincoln Way between 25th Ave and Sunset because there are no stop signs. It's even worst at night. If you live nearby you hear every kind of vehicle tearing down the road, that includes busses going way over the speed limit. Residents asked for a stop sign at 30th. City in its wisdom okayed a stop light which it won't install because it is too expensive. How much would a couple of stop signs (not lights) cost to install? Someone should sue the City for its failure to protect its citizens. Thanks for running the sting but how about doing it occasionally at night when it is even worse!

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:57 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
Bicyclists aren't much better. Less than a week ago in the Outer Sunset, a bicyclist blew through a 4-way stop intersection and nearly plowed into me and my two sons in a crosswalk. As she whizzed by, she had the nerve to say "look both ways before crossing the street, jerk."

6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you San Francisco Police Department. Keep up the pedestrian stings. SF is a wonderful city to walk around were it not for the bad drivers. Granted from time to time a pedestrian pulls a stupid move, but they are not the ones throwing the big machines around. Thank you also SF Examiner for carrying this story. The Examiner is always reports on pedestrian issues and I am grateful. Robert Kolbe

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
No surprise here, cyclist, pedestrians there all in the way. It is all fair game to the gass holes. 17 tickets in 90 minutes. I bet the the person in the pick-up truck was on the cell phone while blowing past the cross walk. Now lets see how many of those tickets actually generate the $250.00 fines. Take back the streets from the gass holes!!!

15 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)