
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - San Francisco could put more police officers on the street by cutting the number of police stations in The City by half, according to a study released Tuesday.
There are 10 district stations in The City covering areas as small as the Tenderloin and as large as the 9-square-mile area of Bayview-Hunters Point, each with its own captain and reporting officers. Restructuring the districts into five larger areas would increase efficiency and be more “fiscally responsible” in the long run, according to the report.
“The community wants more police presence in the neighborhoods, more patrol, more people in cars and doing foot beats,” said City Services Auditor Peg Stevenson. “The way you get that is by having fewer stations rather than more stations, because with more stations you duplicate positions such as desk work and administrative positions.”
The Board of Supervisors commissioned this latest study, along with a recent report on foot patrols, through a contract with the Police Safety Strategy Group. Both studies cost The City about $332,000. The Police Commission and the Board of Supervisors Public Safety Committee will meet Monday to discuss the report.
“I don’t believe the current system is working well, and I think we’re poised for change,” said Supervisor Ross Mirkarimi, who chairs the board’s public safety committee. “When I first read the report, I thought, whoa, this goes in the opposite direction. Then I asked a lot of questions, and I think there are some thoughtful ideas here.”
Mayoral spokesman Nathan Ballard called the proposal an “intriguing idea,” with “some good things about it,” but said it would require further study and public input before any changes would come about.
Many residents are happy to have a nearby police station, Police Union President Gary Delagnes said. The City could have significant trouble making the changes, he said.
“Whether or not there’s going to be a redistribution of manpower is up in the air,” Delagnes said. “The price tag would be incredible — a new station would cost at least $20 million. Then there’s the added issue of people losing their neighborhood stations. Nothing gets done in this town. It’s political gridlock.”
The study, conducted by a Massachusetts-based law enforcement consulting group, also found dire deficiencies in the structural integrity of stations and the ability of officers to do their jobs.
Officers rarely have a place to concentrate when writing reports and the department lacks a “modern Records Management System.” In addition, nine of the 10 district stations lack a private interview room. The report also found that e-mail and Internet access was practically nonexistent.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:26 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "San Carlos police escape staff reductions — for now"
Report as inappropriate
4:48 AM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008
re: "Baltimore City's top police lawyer joins O’Malley administration under fire"
Report as inappropriate
11:22 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008
re: "Joint meeting would address club hubbub"
Report as inappropriate
1:29 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008
re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"
Report as inappropriate
9:17 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"
Report as inappropriate
8:57 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"
Report as inappropriate
7:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"
Report as inappropriate
6:12 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008
re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
San Carlos Police ..... USELESS IDIOTS !
14 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What logic! With Hornig at the helm Baltimore City loses as many jury trials a year as they used to have altogether. Only in government would an official point to that as victory.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I don't know anyone who moved to North Beach because they thought it was going to be a quiet neigbhorhood?
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I agree that there is an issue (City drivers are horrible, generally some of the most inept I've seen), but the sting operation isn't the best way to go about this. Observe that a scooter got hit, and regardless of the motive, I sure would've been livid had that been me. Further, I ride a motorcycle (and live in the area) - I do not stop for pedestrians unless they are actually in the road (this may infuriate people or not technically meet the law; I intend to check now whether you must stop for people not actually already crossing) because I know I'm a sitting duck at that point, and I observe by the minute just how attentive SF drivers are. Footnote - don't believe for a second that hands-free phones make one whit of difference.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
24/7 vehicles speed down this stretch of Lincoln Way between 25th Ave and Sunset because there are no stop signs. It's even worst at night. If you live nearby you hear every kind of vehicle tearing down the road, that includes busses going way over the speed limit. Residents asked for a stop sign at 30th. City in its wisdom okayed a stop light which it won't install because it is too expensive. How much would a couple of stop signs (not lights) cost to install? Someone should sue the City for its failure to protect its citizens. Thanks for running the sting but how about doing it occasionally at night when it is even worse!
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Bicyclists aren't much better. Less than a week ago in the Outer Sunset, a bicyclist blew through a 4-way stop intersection and nearly plowed into me and my two sons in a crosswalk. As she whizzed by, she had the nerve to say "look both ways before crossing the street, jerk."
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thank you San Francisco Police Department. Keep up the pedestrian stings. SF is a wonderful city to walk around were it not for the bad drivers. Granted from time to time a pedestrian pulls a stupid move, but they are not the ones throwing the big machines around. Thank you also SF Examiner for carrying this story. The Examiner is always reports on pedestrian issues and I am grateful. Robert Kolbe
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
No surprise here, cyclist, pedestrians there all in the way. It is all fair game to the gass holes. 17 tickets in 90 minutes. I bet the the person in the pick-up truck was on the cell phone while blowing past the cross walk. Now lets see how many of those tickets actually generate the $250.00 fines. Take back the streets from the gass holes!!!
15 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree