
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Home run king Barry Bonds was hit Tuesday with a new indictment of 14 felony charges of lying to a grand jury about his use of steroids and one charge of hampering the federal investigation into doping by a Bay Area laboratory.
The new indictment comes after U.S. District Judge Susan Illston ruled in February that a previous indictment was too vague.
The case centers on whether the Giants’ longtime left fielder lied about steroid use when he testified before a federal grand jury investigating steroid distribution and money laundering by the Bay Area Laboratory Co-Operative, a Burlingame-based company.
Bonds, who currently is unemployed but says he wants to play, was indicted in November on four counts of perjury and one count of obstruction of justice.
That indictment came three months after Bonds broke one of the most hallowed records in sports, Hank Aaron’s career home run milestone of 755.
The slugger’s monumental season has so far been his last because no team has elected to sign the free agent.
In December, he pleaded not guilty to the charges, which carried a maximum of 30 years in federal prison, but at the time, his attorneys expressed concerns about what they described as serious flaws in the indictment.
The original indictment alleged Bonds lied 19 times during his testimony when he denied ever knowingly taking steroids or performance-enhancing drugs.
During his 2003 testimony, Bonds was presented with “doping” calendars with his initials and other evidence, according to documents unsealed in February.
Federal prosecutors were ordered Feb. 29 to amend the indictment of Bonds, in what is called a superseding indictment, so that it does not include multiple alleged offenses in a single charge.
Such a circumstance could prove confusing to jurors because they could find one offense to be true and one offense false in a single charge, Bonds’ attorneys argued during the hearing.
The superseding indictment filed Tuesday charges Bonds with one count of obstruction of justice and 14 counts of lying to the grand jury in 2003. It alleges Bonds lied about when he received substances from his personal trainer and childhood friend Greg Anderson, whether he knowingly took steroids offered by Anderson and whether he was injected with a substance by Anderson or others.
Bonds’ attorney Allen Ruby said Bonds would need to be re-arraigned and submit new pleas to the charges, which he added would be “not guilty.”
“Barry Bonds is innocent,” Ruby said.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office offered no further comment beyond the new indictment.
The case will be back in court June 6 for a status conference, Ruby said.
Events leading up to Tuesday’s reindictment of former Giants left fielder Barry Bonds, baseball’s home run king
» Dec. 4, 2003: Barry Bonds testifies to a federal grand jury that he used a clear substance and a cream given to him by personal trainer Greg Anderson, but that he didn’t know they were steroids, according to leaked grand jury transcripts.
» Feb. 12, 2004: Anderson, track coach Remi Korchemny, BALCO President Victor Conte and BALCO Vice President James Valente are charged in a 42-count federal indictment with running a steroid-distribution ring.
» July 15, 2005: Conte and Anderson plead guilty to steroid distribution and money laundering. Valente pleads guilty to one count of distributing illegal steroids.
» Oct. 18, 2005: Conte is sentenced to four months in prison and four months’ home confinement. Anderson is sentenced to three months in prison and three months’ home confinement. Valente is sentenced to probation.
» Dec. 1, 2005: Conte begins serving a four-month prison sentence.
» March 30, 2006: Conte is released from prison. He insists he never gave performance-enhancing drugs to Bonds.
» April 14, 2006: Sources say a federal grand jury is investigating whether Bonds committed perjury when he testified in 2003 that he never knowingly used steroids.
» July 5, 2006: Anderson is found in contempt of court and ordered back to prison after refusing to testify before the federal grand jury investigating Bonds for perjury.
» July 27, 2006: Anderson appears before a new grand jury.
» Aug. 17, 2006: Anderson again refuses to testify before a grand jury investigating Bonds.
» Aug. 28, 2006: Anderson is sent back to jail for not testifying.
» Oct. 5, 2006: A judge orders Anderson released because of a “legal snafu.”
» Nov. 20, 2006: Anderson returns to prison for refusing to testify before a federal grand jury.
» Dec. 27, 2006: An appeals court rules the names and urine samples of about 100 MLB players who tested positive for performance-enhancing drugs three years ago can be used by investigators.
» Feb. 20, 2007: Bonds starts spring training with a pointed challenge to prosecutors: “Let them investigate. Let them, they’ve been doing it this long.”
» Aug. 7, 2007: Bonds hits his 756th career home run to break baseball’s all-time record, which Hank Aaron held for more than three decades.
» November 2007: Bonds’ contract with the Giants expires. The left fielder, who has played for the Giants since 1993, becomes a free agent.
» Nov. 15, 2007: Federal prosecutors indict Bonds on perjury and obstruction-of-justice charges, accusing him of lying to a grand jury when he denied knowingly using performance-enhancing drugs. A judge orders Greg Anderson released from prison.
» Feb. 29: Judge agrees with Bonds’ attorney that prosecutors must edit out many of the alleged lies or seek a new indictment, which could contain more charges. Judge also orders Bonds’ secret grand jury testimony to be unsealed.
» Tuesday: Federal prosecutors file a new indictment, charging Bonds with 14 counts of lying to a grand jury about his use of performance-enhancers and one count of obstruction of justice.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:26 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
8:24 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
11:54 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
11:50 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
10:55 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Dickey: Who will take a chance with Barry?"
Report as inappropriate
10:22 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
12:57 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 2, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
6:14 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
1:08 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 1, 2008
re: "Barry Bonds' legal team hits a double"
Report as inappropriate
6:49 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 6, 2007
re: "Bonds courtroom circus about to begin"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The so called fan seems to be doing to Barry exactly what they accuse him of having done. Tell the media to take a hike. And if your favorite player did that you'd be on the side of the media, right? I don't think so.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Discerner said:
Does the chickens coming home to roost saying seem right for the "king" The way he has treated people in the past is coming back to haunt him.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Personally, on an emotional level, I would love to see Bonds go to the Yankees this year. I am a big Red Sox fan and seeing Bonds in pin stripes would be a perfect fit, in my eyes. Then my opinion of the Yankees would be complete!
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Oh, those sanctimonious fans who condemn Barry Bonds for alleged use of performance-enhacing drugs.Yup, They're the same ones who blame Eve for Man's downfaul, the same choir that sucks-up a Martini during lunch to drown out their disillusionment with their job, and the same adulters/adultresses who satiate themselves outside the trust of matrimony. What's the famous passage? Let he who has not sinned cast.... It was their hypocritical voice that force Giants' managment to exercise the stupidest decision in baseball - release Bonds. It was exciting with Bond on the team. He changed the dynamics of the game. Pitchers feared him. He put meat on the seats. Alas, it was the reason, whether to cheer or boo, to take in a game. What are Giants without Bonds? Lifeless. Boring - cameras spend more time on coaches and the bullpen than on the field. A team will pick-up Bonds, and his performance with the new team will put the Giants management to shame. Genius has to be tolerated.
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wasn't Dickey the guy who said Mike Montgomery would never sign with Cal? I suspect that no team, especially the Yankees, would soil themselves with Bonds' baggage. Some say he wore out last year because he had to play the outfield. Others say he's simply gotten old. I doubt, given that he's now a year older and has been away from competitive pitching, that he'll be horrible effective come the dog days of summer.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
For the Examiner Reader who says, "Barry is a hero", well, if he was a hero, then he would not cheated himself to become one. He was already on a verge of success, and now this has tarnished his reputation. Barry is not a hero not like Babe Ruth, "Jolting Joe" Dimaggio, Roger Maris, Willie Mays, Jackie Robinson and Hank Aaron, to name a few. Jackie Robinson is a true hero because he had to go through diversity to get to a game that would not allow blacks to play. He got a chance. Barry on the other hand got his chance but what has he taught the future generation of baseball fans? Do future generations think that cheating is a way to become a hero?
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, seriously, who friggin cares?
29 agree | 36 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
Barry Bonds reminds me of, sorta like Hank Aaron on steroids.
28 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why are they wasting so much govt. time and our tax-$$$ on this nonsense? Oh, that's right, Barry is the HOME-RUN KING and the single season HOME RUN KING! America always likes to try and destroy our heroes. They won't get away with it this time! Fight Barry, FIGHT BACK!
42 agree | 28 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
It still surprises me that Barry Bonds was indicted. I thought for sure he was gonna walk.
41 agree | 45 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree