
We will consider publishing letters containing fewer than 150 words.
Submit your letter to the editor
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Dogs have always run off-leash at Miraloma Park and many others. Parents whose children use Miraloma Park have been tired of this situation for years but now, after waiting all year for the park to be redone with it’s beautiful re-sodded grass and the $250,000 spent on it, as you did mention, we are fed up with it. Besides not wanting to see the grass destroyed, we are tired of dogs running up to and scaring some of our children, running over to us and over our blankets, and we are disgusted that kids have had to leave playing early because they have got dog feces all over them.
You mention the “While San Francisco has roughly 110,000 residents under 18 … The City has between 120,000 and 150,000 dogs,” and “The City’s parks consist of 29 off-leash areas for dogs.” Which implies that children are given a fair amount of space.
But may I remind you, children are people (who, by the way, in 10-15 years will be voting and reading papers, while most likely, these dogs will be dead) and dogs, well, are still dogs.
We, as parents of humans, have reached our breaking point and because of some irresponsible, inconsiderate, selfish dog owners, are putting our feet down as they try and take over another park where they don’t pick up and monitor their pets behavior.
Next time, rather than running a picture of a man sitting peacefully with his dog next to him, you might run a picture of children playing with dogs running all over the fields. Please get both sides of the story and report fairly.
Laura Milvy
San Francisco
Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s campaign for president is proof of her bravery, determination, strength and steadfastness. She is enduring savage misogyny of unparalleled proportions.
She is a strong, uncompromising, knowledgeable, articulate, woman and for that men are screaming for her to quit. But it is precisely because she is a strong, uncompromising, knowledgeable, articulate woman that she should never, ever quit. And especially not because she’s a woman. What fool began that ancient rumor? We are in the 21st century now; women can do whatever they darn well want.
Magie Dominic
New York, NY
Senator Leland Yee’s sustained leadership regarding making 19th Avenue a safer roadway reminds us that some politicians out there know how to stick with an issue year in and year out until it is resolved or successfully mitigated. After four attempts, Senator Yee has finally gotten the double-fine zone legislation moved closer than ever to the Governor’s desk. This, along with the countdown signals, enhanced crosswalk designs, signal coordination and more cameras are all long overdue improvements to address the dangers that have existed on 19th Avenue over the last 50 years.
As The Examiner states (Editorial, “Another weapon to tame streets,” May 5), “When a freeway shares the surface streets of a residential neighborhood, expect problems.”
However, even with all of these improvements to 19th Avenue, it seems authorities are overlooking the fact that this is a freeway and the presence of crosswalks at every intersection is a clear and present danger still looking for a remedy. One wonders why some of the east and west bound streets that intersect 19th Avenue have not been slated for elevated walkways or underpasses strategically placed at the “killer” intersections.
If this were done, many pedestrians would at least have the option not to test the new 19th Avenue improvements with their lives. It works on Geary, near Japan Center — why not for the deadliest strip of roadway in the City?
Matt Mitguard
San Francisco
None of the recent articles or letters on the gun club at Lake Merced mentions the fact that open outdoor shooting ranges are not permitted within the city limits of any city like San Francisco.
The discharge of firearms like 12-gauge shotguns within a city or in close proximity to residential neighborhoods is unacceptable by any standard. Even shooters have concerns with the impact of the noise produced from shotgun blasts. They wear protective hearing devices. Unfortunately, nearby joggers, boaters, golfers, park visitors, etc., have to endure the noise.
During the SFPUC land-use review process for Lake Merced, the future of the gun club was necessarily considered. The real issue is not noise, but whether the gun club can continue to justify the use of some 13 acres of prime waterfront land for a limited membership. The club claims a membership of 300 members, of which 150 do not live in S.F. Clearly, the gun club site could be better utilized as a family recreational area and nature educational center that includes a needed wildlife program.
June Wilson
San Francisco
The Examiner gives preference to letters containing fewer than 150 words. Please include name, phone number and city of residence.
By e-mail: letters@sfexaminer.com
By mail:
Editorial Page Editor
The Examiner, 450 Mission St.
San Francisco, CA 94105
By fax: (415) 359-2766
# 4,765 of 7,131 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:37 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Newsom not the best candidate"
Report as inappropriate
12:54 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Supervisors should learn to repair"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Criminals will always have guns"
Report as inappropriate
12:24 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 20, 2008
re: "JROTC not in best interests of kids"
Report as inappropriate
7:50 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008
re: "The circus down at S.F. City Hall"
Report as inappropriate
1:24 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 17, 2008
re: "JROTC not in best interests of kids"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008
re: "Black & White, but not very green"
Report as inappropriate
9:44 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008
re: "Disappointed with nonprofits story"
Report as inappropriate
8:21 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 2, 2008
re: "Easy for Ken Garcia to say"
Report as inappropriate
6:35 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008
re: "Victory for community activism"
Report as inappropriate
6:46 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008
re: "Unfair paying burden for Prop A"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 AM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008
re: "Counterproductive divisiveness"
Report as inappropriate
2:56 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008
re: "Counterproductive divisiveness"
Report as inappropriate
3:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008
re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"
Report as inappropriate
1:49 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008
re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008
re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"
Report as inappropriate
7:40 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008
re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"
Report as inappropriate
10:18 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008
re: "Nader omission is dirty politics"
Report as inappropriate
9:24 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"
Report as inappropriate
5:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Wildlife rescue center needed"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008
re: "Smoking and tobacco-sales bans"
Report as inappropriate
1:47 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"
Report as inappropriate
12:28 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"
Report as inappropriate
12:19 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Vouchers aren’t education solution"
Report as inappropriate
4:54 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"
Report as inappropriate
1:45 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"
Report as inappropriate
1:37 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Silence is betrayal — impeach Bush"
Report as inappropriate
2:24 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Mental illness and murder"
Report as inappropriate
8:17 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "A historic neighborhood theater"
Report as inappropriate
9:32 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "Working women are just catching up"
Report as inappropriate
12:42 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "Working women are just catching up"
Report as inappropriate
6:11 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Garcia wrong on Daly City insults"
Report as inappropriate
2:55 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Airline mergers pose grim future"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008
re: "Landlords leaving the business"
Report as inappropriate
6:06 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008
re: "City torches run for protesters"
Report as inappropriate
7:26 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008
re: "City torches run for protesters"
Report as inappropriate
7:39 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 13, 2008
re: "Torch sparked more than protests"
Report as inappropriate
7:15 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Torch sparked more than protests"
Report as inappropriate
4:28 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Let the Olympic torch proceed in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
2:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Theater loss due to public policy"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Giants should bring back Bonds"
Report as inappropriate
2:24 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "Giants should bring back Bonds"
Report as inappropriate
3:38 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Luring businesses to S.F. doomed"
Report as inappropriate
3:34 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Use lights to protect pedestrians"
Report as inappropriate
2:47 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Let the Olympic torch proceed in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
7:56 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008
re: "Use lights to protect pedestrians"
Examiner Reader said:
Gavin Newsom as Governor of California - now that's funny. Its a very long way between being an adequate mayor of a city less than a million and successfully presiding over the 6th largest economy in the world.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Board of Supes = Ineffective, Arrogant, Useless said:
The Board of Supervisors is ineffective, arrogant and useless. I was infuriated a few years back when they drafted legislation effectively tripling their salaries which was approved by the meager voters who turned out to the polls. Each supe treats his/her district like their own little fiefdom, and their ostensible constituents like peasants whom they despise. I myself have the misforture to live in Chris Daly's District (#6) The pseudo-progressive Daly responds to ever complaint received in District Six by saying there's "nothing" he and his bloated staff can do about quality of life problems like public intoxication, drug dealing, etc. Coupled with a completely ineffectual Distict Attorney and a police force hamstrung by the niceties of "progressivism," it's small wonder that residents have justly begun to take matters into their own hands. I have a license for mace and have used it on overly aggressive, indeed menacing panhandlers at least half a dozen times. Next I buy a gun
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Richmondman said:
Don havis and Michela Alioto share the same trait of being obsessed with making sure that every building, every business and every body spend any money necessary to satisfy every whim of disabled advocates. Fining every business that doesn't provide closed captioning for every public television isn't much different than the scheister lawyer who crusies Columbus Ave looking for businesses to sue. The City has wasted millions of dollars trying to placate disable activists, for the most inane demands.
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To: Barry S. Eisenberg, The Coalition To End JROTC Now! I guess it isn't enough for you to be anti military - you need to prevent others from exposure to information that YOU have deemed inappropriate. I guess you would have the libraries burn books about the miliary as well! We call this fascism in America.
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Scott Abramson - you are a fine American, a man who understands what the military is all about - protecting our freedoms - freedoms the SF school board would like to take away. Thank you
4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I find the whining over the JROTC to be amazing. The ridiculous self appointed progressives would rightly howl up a storm if the born againers tried to make their kids pray in school, but the imaginary god forbid if a kid and his/her parents decide to enroll in JROTC, that free choice drives San Francisco idiots mad.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Citizens United for Neighborhood Planning said:
The B&W Ball advertised a "midnight surprise," which is exactly what the numerous residences within one-quarter mile of City Hall got. Similar to the Blue Angels, our windows shook. Elderly residents were terrified of hostile military aggression. The several thousand children of the district must likewise have been traumatized. As the historic hotel district, Lower Nob Hill represents the heart of SF's tourist industry. Approval of the fireworks reflects an administration taking for granted the needs of our international tourists, as well as of local residents, for peaceful enjoyment of housing. We are already stressed by twice the average number of crimes as comparable districts, based on state calcs, as well as ongoing disturbances from entertainment venues promoted and inappropriately regulated by the Entertainment Commission. The Symphony didn’t need the fireworks. The excess reflects an organization out of touch with or indifferent to our community. Tom Ferriole
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
"Finally, the damning testimony that it was none other than President Bush who was responsible for the outing of Valerie Plame must surely seal the fate of this disgraced president" That's stupid. Just ask Novak.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
EF Sullivan and Ron Getty articulately point out the lack of vision our "progressive" city leaders have. They are competely disengaged from reality. I am employeeing 5 people less than two years ago, and next year I will move our 40 year old SAn Francisco business out of the City. I am sick of the board of Supervisor using me as an ATM and social welfare program. If the likes ofAmmiano and DAly had theirway, all the City's small businesses would be non-profits existing solely to subsidize their ridiculous policies.
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader - Victory for Community Activism said:
Miss Lee, Do you really want what is currently there to be our neighborhoods "lasting legacy," then maybe you need to rethink your position. There are those of us who are 3rd, 4th and 5th Generations in the neighborhood and you do not speak for all of us. Regards, A 5th Generation Neighbor
10 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I support gay marriage, but I also support democracy. Voters decided not to allow gay marriage, If the will of the voters deciding directly does not trump the will of 7 judges, we are in danger of losing our democracy. Only the will of the voters should override the will of the voters. Or else throw out the initiative process - maybe not a bad idea either. It is horribly flawed.
8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Gonna make some money said:
With the overturning of the Gay Marriage Ban, I quickly ran down and threw in my application to Law School. Why? Because with new gay marriages will come gay Divorces. Just like fifty-percent of heterosexual marriages end in divorce, so will gay marriages. Straignt relationships end just like gay ones. Now thre will be property to divide, child support, alimony, etc. And don't go clicking that Disagree vote, just becaure you are gay doesn't mean that the love you feel for your partner is stronger than a hetersexual couple. There just aren't any statistics to measure the longetivity of gay relationships. In any case, when the divorces start happening, I'll be there, with my per hour fee rate, ready to cash in.
12 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
RichmondMan said:
Development of Hunter's Point is not progressing, and will not progress with the current state of no leadership in San Francisco. I worked at Hunter's Point from 1975 through 1985, when the Navy began evictions to start the cleanup and redevelopment. In 23 years, NOTHING has been done. This makes the fiasco of the Fell Street off-ramp look good. In that case, we spent millions on studies and ballot initiatives to appease a vocal minority that didn't ant a freeway crossing Market St. Now these same folks bitch about pedestrians getting hit by cars entering or exiting the freeway. If Chris Daly and other "progressives" are successful, there will never be development at Hunter's Point - at least not the type supported by African Americans who want access to Hunters Point and are currently denied access, and are represented by Sophie Maxwell. The artists who currently occupy Hunter's Point are white progressives - Chris Daly's support group. That is the only reason behind Pro
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Milvy seems to forget there are children with dogs who want to enjoy the parks, too. When I was a kid, the ONLY time I wanted to go to the park was to play with my dog. I sure would have resented being given the message that if a kid prefers a dog and a Frisbee to a ball and a bat, they deserve to be marginalized and treated like outsiders. THAT is "selfish" and short-sighted. Try talking to the kids with dogs in Cole Valley about how they felt when they were locked out of their own park 10 years ago (Grattan) and robbed of a cherished meeting place for them and their pets as well as other community members.
11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wel then since you don't license children there are none in the city. I have seen MANY CHILDREN/PARENTS URINATING in public parks even though there are bathrooms available. Oh and don't get me started on the garbage the families leave behind at parks expecting others to clean up after them.
9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Actually their are only 12,000 licensed dogs in San Francisco, which is the only way that dogs should be counted.
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Chuck said:
Ms. Milvy is absolutely RIGHT. Dogs should NEVER be allowed off leash in a non-dog park. Dog owners that don't obey the rules should be cited for public nuisance. People are far more important than a dog.
14 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nader candidacy is dirty politics!
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The case of Muni fare inspectors is a perfect example of local leaders’ inability to think in a businesslike manner.
"in a businesslike manner" is a bit redundant here...
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carl said:
Re: Wildlife in Agony at Fisherman's Wharf Pier-- "The sea lion’s neck was sliced, and he was in agony through the night because we do not have a wildlife rescue center here within San Francisco city limits." What about Animal Care and Control? San Francisco has ER VETS all around us not to mention all the animal hospitals all up and down the penninsula. San Francisco has way to much buracracy and not enough compasion. Has San Francisco got an answer to care for dying animlas now? Call 311? OMG... my gut hurts!What a sorry city. To bad the sea lion was not in agony elsewhere where he would have gotten the right care. He will know better next time.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thank god San Francisco still has complete wacko's like George Davis.
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Friday night at Civic Center, I boarded the second car of an outbound J-CHURCH with other passengers seated. At Van Ness the driver announced there was "no service" on the second car and we needed to move to the first car. Most passengers looked at each other like what is the driver talking about and onward the train went. After emerging from the tunnel, the driver stopped the train, came back and announced there is "no service" on this train and we must all move to the first car. Can someone tell me when the second car is lit, the doors are working, passengers have been on the train since embaracdeo, what "no service" status is?
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
One must remember that the presence of law enforcement (police, Muni inspectors) affects behavior too. I'm sure that if there were no fare inspectors, there would be much more than $36,000 of fare evasion. While it's anyone's guess how many people paid their fare to avoid a ticket from the inspectors, I'm sure their work amounts to more than the $36,000 quoted.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Aother "let's blame the teachers" editorial. Blame the parents who don't care, who don't parent, or are absent. Blame the school boards, who are providing the executive direction. My wife is a public High school teacher(15 years). She received a $375 increase from 2006 to 2007. Most teachers pay is nearly frozen from the periods between 10-15 years of service. In 2008 she gets a ONE TIME 3% bonus, but no permanent increase. There is no heat in her class room during the winter. Without fail, every class has 35 students for one teacher. Yet at her school they are building a brand new football stadium, new baseball field and press box. The rule is - where things are wrong, follow the money. If the teachers are screwing up public education, where's their cut of the money?
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
on Sunday I was getting on the F train at 5 and Market. The driver ordered passengers to go in the back door. He could not have cared less if people paid or not. I got on for free. Until the idiots at MUNI do something about discipline amongst the drivers nothing is gonna get better. Get rid of the UNION once and for all or privatize. Get some compentent management instead of Newsom political hacks
12 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
MUNI'S service remains a comedy act, unfortunately, its neither efficient or funny.
11 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As a Democrat, I'm sorry to say this. Unlike the Republicans, it appears the Democrats are loathe to alienate *ANY* possible voters in the upcoming election, so impeachment of Bush/Cheney remains unlikely. Considering everthing that has happened in the last 4 years, the Democrats should be walking away with the presidency and we are not. In Barack and Hillary we have candidates which are while capable, arguably unelectable, and the default vote for many Americans, I'm afraid, is likely McCain.
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yes on 98, No on 99.
12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
examiner reader said:
ef sullivan hit the nail on the head. voters, pay attention!
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Women don't "catch up" on 4/22 unless men have not worked since the beginning of the year. Actually, that may be a good idea. Men don't work for a few months every year to allow women to catch up.
11 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
If women earn approximately 77 cents for every dollar a man is paid and "catch up day" is on 4/22, then it takes about 15.7 months for women to earn what men earn in 12 months, not 14 months as stated in the the letter to today's Examiner. The letter does not state that women do the same work as men.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Garcia is gone. Good riddance. But he was right about that neighborhood, though.
7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Joshua Kyle thinks his right to protest was taken away? What irony. An organized attempt to disrupt another organized activity was thwarted by an organized attempt to disrupt the organized disruption.
10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ok, let's be realistic, I pay $2776.00 for my 2 bdrm., Noe Valley flat with an additional 120.00 for an uncovered, parking space. My move-in check to my landlord was $5500.00. The large studio next door is currently on rental market for 1650.00. My closest friend pays $1460.00 for an average studio 2 blocks away. Unless you live in NYC or SF, these can be argued as outrageous sums for rent. Who are these tenants who only want cheap rents?
9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
FYI Examiner orange and yellow are horrible colors for a website.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I love the irony. The "civil disobediants" are quite upset that their best laid plans went awry at the hands of (Newsom), when what they wanted to do was upset what they thought were(Newsoms') best laid plans. When all else fails, they whine about loss of rights. No rights were violated - you're just embarrassed.
10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Imagine that, as Dr. Martin Luther King marched on Selma in non-violent civil dis-obedience, the authorities were able to move Selma two miles away and, hours later, put Selma onto a plane bound for Argentina. The Civil Rights Act might never have been passed. The News-ticker that day would have read: Selma march route changed: Mayor sites public safety concerns. On April 9th 2008 at the Olympic Torch relay in San Francesco, Selma was moved for me and my wife, who is a Tibetan-American and that threatens all our civil rights. The right to protest includes the right to protest in reasonable proximity to the target of the protest, normally within sight and sound. So, for example if I wanted to protest city hall, a permit to protest two miles away would violate my rights. By moving the route of the Olympic torch and the closing ceremonies miles from the publicly published route, the right to protest was denied to my wife and I and all those others who attended.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Remember: It was British who killed thousands tibetans back in 1904. Independent of Tibet? If China blocks the pathway of Tibet, that equal to a death to Tibet. Just take a look at the map, Dalai lama knows well about this.
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
The Olypic Torch Relay said:
I feel that since the running of the torch was started by Hitler in an attempt to glorify the Third Reich, the relay of the torch should be abolished. I'm always surprised every time that tradition takes place. I have nothing against the torch, or the Olympics. But I think the tradition of the flame being moved should be stopped. I don't quite understand why the world has let Hitler's legacy continue. It started as propaganda, and it seems like the whole world is too lost in tradition to let it go.
15 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Resubmit it and be gerneral on all illegals and not single out a ethnic group might help. "Hmmm wonder why my comment about illegals was removed. Truth hurt SF?"
7 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Conscientious Observer said:
Why bring back BONDS ? The Giants should donate the money they would use to a local charity or use it to buy asphalt to fill some of the thousands of potholes around town ... the biggest being the hole SF City Hall & Gavin Newsom et al are in.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
People who own rentals should be able to charge whatever they want! It is thier business. Renters create their own means to generate money or they don't, but they cannot expect to to ride roughshod over owners and government has no right to curb owners investments!
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I hope the City gets what they want. Ten Million illegal aliens all arriving at SF General, all at once, to line up for their free health care. Sweet.
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Richmond Resident said:
I cross 30th and Lincoln every week. Most of the drivers are going at least 50MPH as they cruise through talking on their cell phones. PLEASE put a light there - NOW!!!
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Conscientious Observer said:
Note: 90% of the TIBET "protestors" who are California K-12 educated can NOT find TIBET on the world map. The 10% who can, probably should spend their time more wisely and protest the human rights violations in Oakland, Pinole (Highway 80), Richmond, San Francisco and East Palo Alto with a higher daily body count then Basra, Iraq or Tibet.
13 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re "Use lights to protect pedestrians": I agree. Lights were installed on Fulton at 18th and 22nd Aves, and they have made a huge difference. Fulton traffic (crazy driving) seems barely impeded -- it is still dangerous to try to cross Fulton in the short stretch between the two light-controlled intersections -- but it's great to be able to walk to one of the lights, push the button, wait a bit, and cross safely. Plus, there seems to be far, far fewer car crashes in this whole stretch, now that the lig