Pet owners getting dogged looking for a place to park
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Miraloma Park’s new sod has made it more attractive to dog owners.
(Mike Koozmin/Special to The Examiner)
Miraloma Park’s new sod has made it more attractive to dog owners.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The fresh sod on Miraloma Park’s baseball field is sparking a grass-is-greener debate between dog lovers and parents — one that may seem familiar to San Francisco residents who have been on either side of that fence.

The City spent $250,000 to renovate the field, which reopened this spring, said Supervisor Sean Elsbernd, whose district covers the neighborhood that sits on the eastern side of Mount Davidson. Since then, Elsbernd has received an earful from local parents unhappy about dog owners using the field as a play area.

“We never had any problems there, but now that The City has invested some money in the field, it's one problem after another,” Elsbernd said. “We turned it into a beautiful field, and now everyone wants a piece of it.”

While San Francisco has roughly 110,000 residents under 18, according to 2006 census data, The City has between 120,000 and 150,000 dogs, according to estimates from Animal Care and Control. The City’s parks consist of 29 off-leash areas for dogs and 11 acres of playground space, according to a report from the Sunnyside Park Families and Neighbors.

Before Miraloma Park’s renovation, five to 10 neighbors used to gather each evening to let their dogs play, said Linda Bauman, who brought her two children to the playground Sunday. However, since the park reopened, San Francisco has been stricter about enforcing leash laws, she said.

“If I had a dog, I’d be [upset about the increased enforcement],” said Bauman, though she added that she doesn’t mind dogs in the park “as long as people pick up the poop.”

In San Francisco, tensions in the past between parents and dog owners have created turf wars in city parks, most notably at Duboce Park. Two years ago, the San Francisco Recreation and Park Commission divided the green space into “no dogs,” “dogs-on-leash” and “dogs-off-leash” areas.

But Elsbernd said he doesn't think further changes will come to Miraloma Park soon.

“People talk about a separate dog run, but that requires money, and the playground is next [for renovations],” Elsbernd said. “This budget season, I don't think there’s a lot of discretionary capital to go around.”

Elsbernd and the Miraloma Park Improvement Club will host a meeting Wednesday at 7:30 p.m. to hear locals’ input on use of the field and playground.

bwinegarner@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:34 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 12, 2008 re: "Ailing roofs may pose health risks"

Rational Thinker said:
When is this lousy park gm going to get his walking papers? Please, enough already!

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:17 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Ailing roofs may pose health risks"

Examiner Reader said:
Once again our illustrious General Manager Yomi Agunbiade elects not to address the facts at hand and instead direct his argument to the fact that this letter was submitted using Rec & Park Dept. stationery. Fact is, this was not a complaint letter against the department or anyone person in particular; it was a letter addressing building concerns that our General Manager chose to ignore. He responded only because his name is listed on department stationery and God forbid, don't let the public think I agree with these concerns! Sadly, this is business as usual for our GM. He hired a Director of Operations to act as his buffer so he wouldn't have to deal with day to day concerns such as this and many others that he has chosen not to address. When will it end? Well, perhaps with the recently announced departure of Mayor Newsome's chief of staff, Phil Ginsburg, Mr. Agunbiade may well by on his way out and not a moment too soon!

7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Ailing roofs may pose health risks"

Alabama D'ernie said:
GG park used to be so beautiful when the trees were covered with mold...oh wait that was moss.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Ailing roofs may pose health risks"

Examiner Reader said:
Or maybe we can fire a lot of those do nothing middle managers and supervisors in the Park and Rec Dept and we would come up with lots of cash to fix a lot of the problems at the parks.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Ailing roofs may pose health risks"

Examiner Reader said:
Rather than contract this out, why don't we train unemployed SF young adults in roofing? They'll earn a valuable trade, the City gets its roofs fixed, crime and poverty go down -- win, win, win.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:23 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Pet owners getting dogged looking for a place to park"

Examiner Reader said:
This is rich! Look at the link below the article. Dangers in Dog Parks The first one they mention is that your dog might get injured by an agressive dog, because you never know what kinds of dogs will be there. What about the kids? Kids and dogs are not a good mix. The nicest dog and the nicest kid can all of a sudden be the kid that just got bit because he or she did or did not do something that the dog reacted to. Dogs are animals! They always have the ability to suprise even their owners. Kids will do things that will cause a dog to respond. When I was a little boy (back in the 50's) I got a cowboy outfit for Christmas. I made the mistake of drawing on my Uncle and his beloved German Shepard lunged at me. Kids play - dogs react. Kids should be allowed to run free on ball fields with out having to worry about a dog chasing them down or if the one chasing them down means any harm. Playgrounds for kids!

6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:12 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Pet owners getting dogged looking for a place to park"

Examiner Reader said:
The fact that there are thousands more dogs than kids should not be a rational for giving the parks to the dogs. Miraloma was in terrible shape before it was redone. It was very uneven and you could easily twist your ankle if you were playing with your kids. The dog owners just stand and let thier dogs do their business and dig on the lawn. If I hear another dog owner say "they are responsible" I just might scream. The dogs in this neighborhood bark at anyone that walks by thet bark at people trying to enjoy their own back yards. I had one of these responsible dog owners let her dog bark for hours every afternoon and night while she worked a swing shift. I tried to work with her to no avail. She had no control over the animal. She didn't care about the human suffering she was allowing to happen. It was more important to her to let her dog have access to the back yard while she was gone. Stern Grove and Upper Noe are within minutes of the ball field. They have dog runs there go there!

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:15 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008 re: "Pet owners getting dogged looking for a place to park"

Miraloma neighbor said:
Dog owners at Miraloma Playground do not follow the leash rules up there. The dogs crap and pee all over the field, on the tennis courts. They dig with their paws. The grass field will be wrecked before the summer is over. Dog owners rationalize having their dogs with stupid arguments. Let the kids have a nice field to play on, keep your Mutt on leash and walk it around the block!

23 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:32 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Pet owners getting dogged looking for a place to park"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, hardly any dog owners ever pick up after their dogs ... it is disgusting. How is it any differnt from humans using the streets for toilets? It smells just as bad. Why don't those people have their dogs crap and urinate in front of their OWN HOUSES instead of in front of MY HOUSE? My favorite comment this week "get over it -- when it rains, it will wash it away" ...uh, it is the month of MAY, idiot.

11 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:56 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "City rejects PGA Tour’s bid for fungicide use at Harding"

Examiner Reader said:
Rather than pressuring SF to use dangerous chemicals the PGA ought to be threatening to stop having tournaments at golf courses that don't use recycled water. Harding Park uses Hetch Hetchy water. What a terrible waste.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:20 AM MST on Sat., Apr. 26, 2008 re: "Neighborhood parks are making the grade"

Examiner Reader said:
I wish Supervisor Maxwell and others so inclined, would stop with the comments re: the more affluent neighborhoods receiving the bulk of park funding. As an employee of the Recreation and Park Dept. I can tell you that, through the years, a lot of tax dollars have been allocated to the southeast quadrant of the city, more often at the expense of other areas of the city to address such concerns as playground/field maintenance and recreation programming. This is an area of the city that appears to expect certain entitlements, yet cannot uphold their end of the bargain to respect and work with our department to help maintain our resources. It's tiring to constantly hear that this area is so underfunded and how it's the Recreation and Parks Dept's fault for not doing this, or not doing that. When their play structures, buildings and equipment are vandalized and program attendance is low, we still make the necessary repairs and do the community outreach. And this is still our fault? C'

15 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:39 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008 re: "New proposal for downtown space wins over hearts"

Justine said:
it looks weird that the building is on a high side n the surrounding is low.. why not make it same plane field so it won't look like theres a huge building out of no where???!?!? or face the other building towards ryans park n not block behind JCC...

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:04 AM MST on Sun., Dec. 2, 2007 re: "Once empty lot, now part of community"

Examiner Reader said:
You should see the beautiful 20,000 Christmas lights on the garden of eden on 2600 block of Eager street. This is the twelve years of lifting the spirit of the children and residents. Another example of what to do with a vacant lot - save lives. The lights are on from 5p.m. to 1.33a.m.

128 agree | 133 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:46 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 1, 2007 re: "Future park among largest in county"

Examiner Reader said:
The traffic on woodbine road is bad enough as it is so lets build something to bring in more. The people that were born and raised in woodbine have moved away because of the over crowding and the outsiders coming in. We don't need another yuppie park where people can drive in with their lexus', what about a park were you can drive your tractor in,you know something for the farm people.Lets listen to the people OF WOODBINE not the people thats lived here for a few years.

408 agree | 305 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:35 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007 re: "Future of Rash Field’s volleyball park is uncertain"

Ryan said:
Its interesting that with such a large demand for the Volleyball courts, all of the proposals for the new park have less area for volleyball. There is nothing like city officals that don't listen to the people. You got to love it!

405 agree | 304 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)