
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History San Mateo County (Map, News) - Sean Morgan heard the hollow thump as the Caltrain rumbled through a narrow San Francisco tunnel. The 12-year engineer didn’t have to see what he hit to know he wouldn’t sleep for weeks.
“I knew right away it was a person,” he said. “The sound is unlike any other.”
Many engineers say suicidal pedestrians will look them straight in the eye before being bludgeoned by a train. But it’s the sound the human body makes upon impact that keeps many engineers awake at night, Morgan says.
“It’s like a sledgehammer on a watermelon,” he said. “It stays with you forever.”
Though Caltrain has spent millions on pedestrian safety — adding fencing along rail corridors and plotting warning signs near the tracks — the number of pedestrian fatalities on the tracks continues to be grim. More than 170 people have been killed since 1992; about 60 percent were suicides, said Caltrain spokeswoman Christine Dunn. There have been six deaths already this year with 17 in 2006, just three fewer than a record 20 in 1995.
But those most traumatized by these deaths could be the engineers themselves, many of whom have said they are the forgotten victims of these fatalities. According to a nationwide study, an engineer experiences an average of three fatalities for every 25 years on the job. Engineers in the heavily populated Bay Area could see dozens killed in that time, said Tim Smith, representative of the engineers union, the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen.
Morgan said he’s heard the thump twice as a Caltrain engineer. First in 2001, when a man in his 40s leapt in front of his train from behind a concrete wall along the tracks. And again this last Easter Sunday, when a woman crept into a cramped tunnel just north of the 22nd Street Station.
“There’s no way to stop in time,” he said. “But you always ask yourself, ‘Did I do everything I could have done?’”
Engineers are warned they’ll experience death on the tracks when signing on to the job. They told Morgan it was inevitable.
“They don’t say ‘if’ it will happen to you, they say ‘when,’” he said.
Some engineers blame train suicides on the holidays or economic downturns — periods when people are most depressed. Others say there’s no rhyme or reason, only peaks and valleys.
“I’d argue that while the deceased is in the heavenly realm, the engineer is stuck with living with it for the rest of his life,” Smith said.
Engineers are told the accidents could lead to post-traumatic stress symptoms. Amtrak, which staffs Caltrains with engineers, provides grief counselors following every fatality, Morgan said. But only some engineers accept the help, he said.
“People deal with it in different ways,” he said.
In 20 years running trains, Chris Payne said he’s experienced countless tragedies on the tracks: friends killed, bodies mangled, cars crunched. The list goes on and on.
During his engineer tenure, he struck and killed eight pedestrians — more than half were suicides, he said. But it was his latest experience with death that made him take a sabbatical from the driver’s seat, he said.
“I was coming into the Redwood City Station and a 70-year-old man jumped into the air like a cannonball into a swimming pool and I hit him in mid-air,” said Payne, who added that he saw up to eight pedestrian deaths in 20 years driving trains. “That was enough for me.”
Tired with the bloodshed, Payne took on a rail safety position with Caltrain to find ways to prevent fatalities. For the past nine years, Payne has implemented numerous programs aimed at making Caltrain safer for both pedestrians and train crews.
He spearheaded a recent Caltrain plan to mount cameras on the trains to record happenings around the tracks. He said the cameras would not only help transit police shoo off trespassers, but will also provide much-needed closure for engineers involved in fatalities.
“[Filming the incidents] might make it easier for [engineers] to understand there was nothing they could do.”
Payne has also led efforts to install pedestrian fencing along the tracks, to retrofit stations minimizing pedestrian traffic across tracks, and to heighten police enforcement against trespassers, among other measures. Caltrain has also put up suicide safety signs, run numerous television and radio advertisements on train safety and conducted public outreach at schools.
Recent Caltrain safety measures
Listed by year, the California commuter rail line has spent millions on pedestrian safety efforts:
» 1997: Construction of fences along rail corridors
» 1998: Platform construction on each side of track begins
» 1999-2000: Posting of 1,100 no-trespassing signs
» 2000: Removal of grade crossings with no signals
» 2000: Change rules on emergency braking procedures
» 2001: Safety database instituted
» 2001: Installation of suicide prevention signs every 540 feet on track
» 2003: Improvement of warning horns on trains
» 2003: Plan to ticket trespassers on tracks enforced
» 2008: Camera mounted on trains
Source: Caltrain

Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
|
People who read this also read:
|
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:42 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
3:58 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008
re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
10:32 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008
re: "Commuters ready to launch"
Report as inappropriate
2:41 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"
Report as inappropriate
2:18 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
12:28 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."
Report as inappropriate
9:14 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008
re: "Caltrain deaths a fact of engineers’ lives"
Report as inappropriate
5:53 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Caltrain cameras would aid investigation process"
Report as inappropriate
11:35 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Sixth death on tracks in 2008 is woman, 63"
Report as inappropriate
10:39 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"
Report as inappropriate
8:32 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008
re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"
Report as inappropriate
9:03 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008
re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"
Report as inappropriate
5:06 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008
re: "Lack of funds may dead-end transit projects"
Report as inappropriate
6:07 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007
re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"
Report as inappropriate
3:29 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007
re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I'm not familiar with the Federal Law that is referenced in the article. Please specify the Federal Law.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A smart proposal for Commuter Checks or something similar. I work for SFSU, and while this legislation is does not have any jurisdiction on State of California property, we are the only California State University offering this program to its employees. It is pre-taxed from your payroll, and I felt it was simple enough to spend a couple of minutes to fill out the paperwork and place my order online. And presto! My check came in the mail. Even easier, instead of asking for a check, you can have an actual pass, and even BART tickets mailed to you. Translink now offers automatic uploading of electronic cash to your account too. This means you don't have to hassle with claiming the check.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ferry project sounds like a good one. With the the cities and state broke, how will it be paid for?
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
While this program could have considerable benefits, how is MUNI going to handle the increased ridership when it appears fully-challenged servicing existing ridership?
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ah the communist nation of San Francisco and Comrade Smikirmi is at it again. I don't think they should require small businesses to offer this to employees. If Matthew the coffee shop barista wants to be paid for his commute, then he should find an office job. Those companies offer commuter benefits. When will the regulation of small business in SF end?
0 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Getting more city employees out of their cars is actually quite easy: cut the number of parking spaces available to employees, or make them more expensive.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Regarding what grumpy Martin Engel said in the first comment. Maybe Caltrain has a legitimate concern in wanting to cover their a**. I know for a fact that the families many of those yahoos who walk around the downed crossing gates and right in front of the trains, ignoring blaring horns, lights and bells seek out the first ambulance chasing lawyer they can find and sue the railroad. Personal responsibility in today's world? You've got to be kidding! It was all that bad old railroad's fault, even if their beloved was drunk and laying on the tracks or had his head half way up his you-know-what!
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Martin Engel said:
Cameras? A million dollar grant? Half a million for the cameras? Why? Will that make the tracks any safer? I don't think so. Then, what are they for? They will relieve Caltrain and its personnel from any liability by documenting how none of the accidents/fatalities are their fault. In Mike Rosenberg's article, he even uses the headline to make my point, only in a much more neutral way. (To put it bluntly, it's a free "cover-their-a**" investment!) The other reason is that getting "free" money, like grants, is what government organizations do. Getting and spending the money is more important than solving any problem. The money comes from the 1-B bond issue, one billion of which was earmarked for "public-transit system safety enhancements." How cameras will make the train corridor safer is an explanation I would like to hear. Fencing? Four-Quad Gates? Sure. But cameras? Post-mortem?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Engineer not conductor. Engineers are opereating the train.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Be happy that people with insight and vision found a way to agree and build BART decades ago...I moved to Hawaii (from SF) and my commute wastes 3 hours each day on Oahu (just to get to work) by car. If I take the bus, add an hour each way. It's just as fast to bicycle the entire distance (35 miles to Waianae). Why? Because our city council killed "rail transit" 16 years ago...and they're are still not in agreement! I would recommend bicycling to others but the lack of adequate (safe) bike paths makes it so dangerous I won't even take my children riding to the beach...so stop whining and ride BART, MUNI, or your BIKE...It's the only long term solution for a sustainable future
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm looking forward to the silver lining, when some of the new, more affluent, better-connected riders pitch a fit about how difficult and miserable it is to get around on the bus. No insult to the drivers: you're stuck, too, and make my day when you try to get us all on board and where we need to go.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I wish I can believe that people are starting to care about our environment by taking public transit, but I think it has more to do with high gas prices than anything else.
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
MUNI's inability to service existing lines didn't stop the T-line from being built. The city will likely continue such transit line construction to create the illusion that adequate transit service exists in any number of neighborhoods, for any number of housing developments. As far as I can tell, these new lines are being built (as selling points) to satisfy developers as much as serving ridership.
52 agree | 49 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm with Seven on this one. How is yet another MUNI line going to be adequately serviced when MUNI cannot even adequately serve existing lines?
52 agree | 58 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Seven said:
Couldn't we skip the central subway and use the money to actually improve Muni?
54 agree | 53 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree