Fire investigators’ qualifications questioned
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The D.C. firefighters assigned as the lead investigators in probes of the most significant blazes in the past year had little experience in arson cases and were not certified as fire investigators, sources told The Examiner.

In six major fires — including the Eastern Market fire, the town house fire that injured four fire fighters, and the five-alarm blaze at the Mount Pleasant apartment — the department used firefighters who had been detailed from rescue or engine companies to head up the probes.

“That’s bad,” said John DeHaan, a leading arson expert and author of “Kirk’s Fire Investigation,” the most widely used textbook for fire investigations. “It’s like taking someone with a degree in physiology and turning them loose as a surgeon.”

 Although a certification is not a guarantee that the investigator will do a perfect job, DeHaan said, “it’s at least a start to assure that you have a baseline knowledge and you’re not going to make things up as you go along.”

District fire officials downplayed the certifications and said it doesn’t matter who the lead on the case is because the investigators in major fires work alongside veterans from the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and with D.C. police detectives in the D.C. Arson Task Force.

“Chief [Dennis] Rubin is not going to put anyone in a position that is going to discredit the agency,” Battalion Chief Kenneth Crosswhite said. “These people meet the standards.”

To justify the qualifications of the firefighters who were placed in charge of the major cases, D.C. fire officials point to a National Fire Academy course that was taught in-house in 2006.

But National Fire Academy training specialist Doug Williams and former D.C. Fire Marshal Richard Fleming said the classes had nothing to do with qualifying for anything. They were designed to interest firefighters into becoming investigators because the department had a critical shortage at the position.

Those classes were later called into question by a D.C. inspector general’s investigation that found that that District’s instructor gave test questions to a select group of students before the exam.

Don Wood, the District’s first certified fire investigator and now a fire safety officer for Unified Investigation and Sciences Inc., said being properly certified is especially important for lead fire investigators in the courtroom, where they go up against certified professionals called to testify by lawyers in criminal cases and lawsuits.

“How can you go into court and say with a straight face that you have a basic knowledge of fire investigation?” Wood asked.

The lead investigator is in charge of directing the probe, completing the final report, certifying to its truthfulness and testifying under oath, experts said.

The District’s lead investigator assigned to the Georgetown public library fire, for instance, was Dave Williams, a firefighter who had been detailed to the arson unit from Engine Company 19, according to fire department and arson task force officials.

Williams has since returned to the firehouse, officials confirmed. In that case, the District has sued Dynamic Corp. for negligence, saying a subcontractor for the Hyattsville company used heat guns that ignited the fire. The company contends that it didn’t have heat guns at the site.

That illustrated the problem with having inexperienced, uncertified firefighters assigned as lead investigators, experts said.

smccabe@dcexaminer.com

People who read this also read:

Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:49 PM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Fire investigators’ qualifications questioned"

Mike Licht said:
Re: Unqualified fire examiners -- Does anyone else remember the unqualified MPD fingerprint examiner? Dozens of cases were thrown out of court when he was exposed. Time to re-examine the Eastern Market fire, since ATF opinions differed from those of DCFD.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:58 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "3 teens charged with arson at bus stop"

Examiner Reader said:
haha i know one of the kids in the case and I'm glad they are locking him away...good riddance

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:18 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "3 teens charged with arson at bus stop"

Examiner Reader said:
wonder if any of people who set the porch on fire know what about the elderly woman who died when the dc arsonist set one on her porch. to mr. hats-off with the "moral smile," get a life, and a conscience.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:01 AM MST on Thu., Nov. 22, 2007 re: "Essex man charged with arson in Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
When I first heard about this fire in the news media, I knew immediately it was one of these boyfriend/girlfriend situations among a certain race of people which usually end in either an arson or acid throwing incident.

99 agree | 119 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Fire guts adult store, injures firefighter"

Examiner Reader said:
Jeez, pal. Try Strunk and White ("The Elements of Style"). No, it's not a television show or a wine cooler but it'll help.

148 agree | 118 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:49 PM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Fire guts adult store, injures firefighter"

Examiner Reader said:
Sounds like the work of Self-rightous Christians. Also any one who take thier hats off to an arsonist is not a moralist

141 agree | 142 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:33 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 3, 2007 re: "Arson damages adult bookstore in Aberdeen"

Examiner Reader said:
I dont normally condone committing crimes...but this case brings a moral smile to my face..."hats-off" Mr. Arsonist

191 agree | 183 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:10 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 25, 2007 re: "Carroll police: Teens likely culprits in arsons"

Examiner Reader said:
1.2 million for computers.. Get rid of the resident trooper program and they will have several million for equipment and deputies..

148 agree | 158 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)