Housing aid bill faces veto by President Bush
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Chart shows nationwide foreclosure filings; 1c x 2 1/2 inches; 46.5 mm x 63.5 mm
(Merrill Sherman)
Chart shows nationwide foreclosure filings; 1c x 2 1/2 inches; 46.5 mm x 63.5 mm

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Democrats' plans to help hundreds of thousands of homeowners struggling with rising subprime mortgage rates and plummeting house values could be sidetracked by President Bush's threatened veto and the opposition of many congressional Republicans.

Opponents of the plan say more prudent homebuyers and renters shouldn't be called upon to bail out borrowers who gambled on ever-rising housing prices and lost.

"The American people don't want to make their neighbor's payment when they're having trouble making their own," said Rep. Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas.

The Democratic-controlled House on Thursday passed a homeowner rescue plan that would provide cheaper, government-backed mortgages to half a million debt-ridden borrowers and bolster an economy crippled by the housing crisis. The House approved the measure by a vote of 266-154, with 39 Republicans - mostly from areas suffering worst from housing woes - supporting it.

Defying veto threats, the House voted to let the Federal Housing Administration take on up to $300 billion in new mortgages so that financially strapped borrowers facing foreclosure could refinance.

The plan by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., is the centerpiece of a broader package of bills approved Thursday that Democrats say will prevent more foreclosures and help homeowners and communities deal with the fallout from the mortgage crisis.

The measure is targeted at homeowners facing default, including many who owe more than their houses are worth.

For instance, a homeowner who owes $290,000 on a house now worth $225,000 could refinance into an FHA-backed loan if the mortgage holder was willing to take a loss of about 36 percent. The borrower's monthly mortgage payments would fall from $2,200 to about $1,200.

Loan holders would have an incentive to participate, proponents believe, since the alternative would be costly foreclosures, which can involve losses of 50 percent or more.

Supporters hope the package - which awaits action in the Senate - will serve as the basis for a broad bipartisan housing compromise that could satisfy both parties' keen appetite for delivering election-year aid to anxious constituents.

But Bush's veto warnings, backed by staunch GOP opposition, are clouding its prospects.

"House Democrats passed bills that they know will never become law. Most Americans understand that we shouldn't create a taxpayer-funded bailout for lenders and speculators," said Tony Fratto, a White House spokesman.

Under Frank's plan, homeowners currently considered too risky to qualify could refinance into FHA-backed loans if their lenders agreed to take substantial losses on the original mortgages. Borrowers would have to show they could afford to make payments on the new loans. They would have to share with FHA at least half of their proceeds if they profited from selling or refinancing again.

The plan is projected to cost $2.7 billion over the next five years.

The House on Thursday also passed, 239-188, a bill to send $15 billion to states to buy and fix up foreclosed property. Bush has threatened to veto that measure also, contending it rewards the very lenders who helped caused the housing chaos and could act as an incentive for them to foreclose rather than find ways to help struggling borrowers stay in their homes.

---

The bills are H.R. 5818 and H.R. H830

---

Copyright 2008 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


Name
Comments

characters left

Article Comments

Comments from Examiner Readers

9:59 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Housing rescue package set for House vote"

Examiner Reader said:
this is american growth ? create a problem,then fix it with another.and as time passes the taxpayers will pay for the new buzzardized economy ,and not even realize it.sort of like lincoln savings and loan in the eightys,and enron during flyboys reign

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:46 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Republicans push rival housing plan"

Examiner Reader said:
republicans arn't going to do squat for this country,its in their genes.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:53 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Senate Passes Housing Bill"

Examiner Reader said:
no matter what the govt does,the value of your house isnt going to go up past what you owe. sorta of like buying a car.built in depreciation with your signature.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:17 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Senate Passes Housing Bill"

Examiner Reader said:
now they can mothball their unsold and foreclosed houses and make a little money off the taxpayer. should help with the purchase of that new helicopter for their yacht. probably get a tax break on that too.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:35 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Democrats Split on Housing"

Examiner Reader said:
too bad the administration had to go to the extreme of distroying the economy to get rid of the mortgage interest deduction by foreclosure. oh well, it give the dems more reason to sit on their asses and wait for the next crisis or senate hearing to do nothing about. wish i would have known a long time ago that you can be dysfunctional and ignorant to be a politician repub or dem.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Senate Drops Aid for Bankrupt Homeowners"

Examiner Reader said:
since the govt ownes the banks and stock market,they own the foreclosed homes. thats great diminishing collateral for borrowing more overseas money to finance their halfassed wars.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:05 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Senate Leaders Agree on Housing Relief"

Examiner Reader said:
all we need now is a dust bowl,and ill bet congress is working overtime on that!

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
INCLUDED
 

(page generated in 0.27 seconds)