Misfits and misspellings: ‘Son of Rambow’ is a sweet homage to 1980s
Article History
There are updates to this article.
You can’t help but care about school ruffian Carter (Will Poulter), left, and his clueless pal Will (Bill Milner) as they set out to enter an amateur filmmakers’ contest with their own rudimentary, all-child Rambo sequel. – Paramount

You can’t help but care about school ruffian Carter (Will Poulter), left, and his clueless pal Will (Bill Milner) as they set out to enter an amateur filmmakers’ contest with their own rudimentary, all-child Rambo sequel. – Paramount

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The intentionally misspelled “Son of Rambow” is a sweet though minor English mix with a no-name junior cast. Part broad coming-of-age comedy, part dysfunctional-family drama, it’s also an affectionate homage to early 1980s nostalgia and a certain bandolier-laden Vietnam vet who looks an awful lot like Sly Stallone in a headband.

Anyone who has ever really adored a movie may be able to relate to how two disaffected boys bond over and escape from their childhood pain through their shared love of “First Blood.”

The product of a strict religious sect, the shy and clueless Will (Bill Milner) has been cut off from modern culture until he meets the reviled school ruffian Carter (Will Poulter). Essentially left to raise himself by an absent mother, Carter acts out until he finds an unlikely ally in his opposite number Will. Soon the boys will find status and brotherhood together when they set out to enter an amateur filmmakers’ contest with their own rudimentary, all-child Rambo sequel.

With its droll homemade movie-within-the-movie production values and its theme about cinematic passion, “Son of Rambow” brings to mind the recent Jack Black satire “Be Kind Rewind.” But Brit writer-director Garth Jennings (responsible for the unwatchable dud “The Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy”) infuses today’s view of big-screen kitsch with a bit more heart. Because even though the plot and backstories seem contrived, the relationship between this pair of lonely children does turn out in the end to be unexpectedly touching. The two inexperienced, young actors playing the protagonists communicate a natural vulnerability. So you can’t help but care about them.    

Also enriching the middling piece is its observant subplot about the weird hierarchy of life in early adolescence. A French exchange student, Didier (Jules Sitruk), introduces New Wave fashion and cool Gallic attitude to the movie’s staid little academic outpost of pastoral England. In the process, the comical character comments on the exquisite torture we all can recall when peer approval and boy-girl discovery loomed large.

If only this “Rambow” had more depth and narrative surprises in its arsenal.  

‘Son of Rambow’

??? 


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:41 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 20, 2008 re: "Review: Streep saves ‘Mamma Mia!’"

Examiner Reader said:
I liked the movie Mama Mia. I saw it with my daughter and thougt it was refreshing... so what that some didn't have thesinging voice but the laughter was always there. I recommend this movie to anyone who just wants to laugh and leave life for a short time. I am not one for musicals and was not happy that my daughter picked this but I was so glad she did!! FUN FUN FUN!!!!

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:55 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

Examiner Reader said:
"Why, after an hour of pratfalls, try to reinvent Hancock as a somber second coming of the Caped Crusader? I like the idea of a disgraced superhero struggling to rehabilitate his image." This specific comment leads me to believe that you missed the point, and that you would rather drop a clever phrase in your own creation, your critique, than do your job as a critic and evaluate fully what was given to you (instead of "what if?") By the way, "Caped Crusader" is a name most often attributed to Bruce Wayne's alter ego, not the "aww, gee" squeaky clean Superman (which I believe is what you inferred). The ending, which focused on the familiar comic themes, of self sacrifice and the powers of the ordinary were very satisfying for this comic fan. The questions left unanswered in the movie are what number one issues are made of. I have a complaint: more of the title's credit should have been given to Bateman and Theron in my opinion. Hancock, albeit misnamed, was a great introduction.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:23 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Review: A profile of a ‘Gonzo’ guy"

Gone. So? said:
So many seemingly brilliant alcoholic/addicts whose works became extremely popular through the mass media during the latter half of the twentieth century have had such an endelible influence on American culture that by now you'd expect one of them to perhaps become President of the United States. Oh yeah, right, one already has.

10 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008 re: "Review: An odd kind of hero"

MrHyphy said:
Hancock is a good movie end of story.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:59 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 15, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
just came back from seeing a movie that i thought would be great but it WAS SOME GARBAGE DON'T WAIST UR TIME OR MONEY VIA MOVIE THEATRE OR DVD

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:31 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
M. Knight is the modern day equivalent to Alfred Hithcock. I completely disagree with this review and her review of his last two movies. The Village was one his best movies, and The Lady in the Water was also a great movie. Some people just don't have minds capable of seeing outside the box and wondering what if. Case in point, Sally Kline.

11 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "‘The Happening’ really isn’t"

Examiner Reader said:
The movie kicked ass!

11 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
You, sir, are an idiot of the highest order.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:25 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Hulk’ isn’t incredible"

Examiner Reader said:
This was a great movie with a great story line. But hey what would you expect from a critic.

10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:36 AM MST on Fri., May. 30, 2008 re: "Review: The girls are back in town"

Examiner Reader said:
Dear Ms. Katz, You are quite the bitch for revealing that "Big stands Carrie up at the = alter"! Gwen Evans

15 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:31 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Review: Goin’ back to ‘Indiana’"

Examiner Reader said:
wow the review of the new Indiana Jones movie really over rates it--unlike the others it is ALL style and no substance. the movie has a return of karen allen but then does nothing with her; and what is this===Happy Days meets the X Files? it maybe but isnt an Indiana Jones movie.

16 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:32 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
Cont...With regards to Battle for Haditha (see below): This 'rampage' point of view has been disproven. (3) There is evidence that these Marines were used as scapegoats to appease a liberal media and Anti-War sentiments in the Senate and govt like Murtha. There is evidence of undue command influence in the hubris investigation that ensued. The investigation was unprecedented. These Marines were asked to make split moment decisions under duress that most of us would be hard pressed to do differently under similar circumstances. Interesting fact from the think tank AEI: A poll of tribal leaders across Iraq was recently conducted about US elections and who they would vote for, McCain, Obama, or Clinton. A majority would vote for John McCain but in Al Anbar where Haditha occurred, the tribal leaders want to re-elect George Bush. The Iraqi leaders greatly fear us leaving b/c that would ensure the return of the henchmen who murdered and terrorized the locals. They want peace and stabilit

11 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:28 PM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "Review: There will be blood on their hands"

Examiner Reader said:
With regards to Battle for Haditha: To imply this movie is an accurate representation of the Haditha incident is misguided and disingenuous. This movie is far from an accurate representation of what occurred but conjecture based on misinformation. The truth of what occurred and mistakes made are coming out now. So how did the director possibly know what really happened when he made this movie? These are what we do know now: (1) The incident was a set up from insurgents who were looking to create an Iraq massacre for political gain and as part of their information operations. Al Qaeda filmed the carnage and the American and world media appeased them. (2) There is evidence from drones that there were insurgents fleeing from the buildings the Marines cleared. The Marines who cleared the buildings were not targeting civilians and were following orders. Their intentions were to ensure their own safety and not from a desire to take revenge or go on some kind of rampage. This 'rampage' poin

14 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008 re: "No need for hollow, horribly acted ‘Speed’"

Examiner Reader said:
I have heard a lot of trash about this movie, but I have to disagree. I loved it. The part most people miss is that it stays true to the cartoon that inspired it. Sure, it is hokie, far-fetched and dated, but that's just the way the cartoon was! Besides, this show has a lot of action and happy ending. Who wouldn't like that?

13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:00 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Review: Terrorism enters stoned age"

Examiner Reader said:
Pretty spot-on review, but critics (even Asian Ameircan critics, who are falling over themselves to celebrate the fact that Asians are starring in a mainstream hit movie without being, well, you know, ASIAN) including Examiner's are missing he huge red flag od sexism that permrates both ,ovies but this one even more so. Yeah, so that's part and parcel of the juvenile, hormone-drenched guy genre, but it doesn't excuse the over-the-top nature of this movie's juvenalia. It almsot negates both the empowring of Asian Americans AND the bits of smart political commentary casually tossed off throughout the dialogue. And BTW, Rossiter, there are no hyphens in "Indian American" and "Korean American."

13 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Nights’ can leave you feeling blue"

Melisa said:
The movie was alright - I enjoyed all the cinematic imagery, but I esp. loved the music in the film. I just bought the soundtrack and I can't stop listening to it - really great!

26 agree | 31 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:44 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Review: Caught in the net of 'Spiderwick’"

Examiner Reader said:
I read the books and I am an adult female that enjoys a good fantasy book without romance in it. Yes, the books are a bit different, but the story line moved quite well even though it was much different from the books. Well done. My whole family watched it and it was entertaining to us.

109 agree | 100 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:38 PM MST on Tue., Nov. 20, 2007 re: "Review: ‘Lions for Lambs’ more like medicine than a movie"

mandela said:
"Lions for lambs" is a colossal bore.

242 agree | 212 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:26 PM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
Pirates of the Caribbean(all 3)have to be the best movies i have ever seen. This is an extremely harsh review of a completely AWEsome movie! I mean come on there had to be something this reviewer liked about it.

289 agree | 280 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:30 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 2, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Examiner Reader said:
RE: POTC3 - I found it to be highly entertaining-which is what a movie is supposed to be! Hey, some liked it, some didn't - so what? Johnny Depp made all 3 movies fun to watch (he IS very easy on the eyes)! A lot of people loved it - hence its popularity. Fantasy pictures are fun - much needed in today's world. There are many "serious" movies with plots so convoluted a person would leave the theater confused. With POTC a person could leave the theater laughing (hang the plots) and wanting more. I think sometimes even critics don't know what they want in a movie. But, you can bet your bottom dollar that if there's a POTC4 it'll be a hit - again, hang the "plots", bring on the characters and the FUN! And if the first 3 didn't float your boat then stay home!

318 agree | 312 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:18 PM MST on Sun., Jul. 1, 2007 re: "Unbalanced, powerful ‘Sicko’ a movie that matters"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree with Sally Kline's assessment of Michael Moore's documentary... the film left me thoroughly disgusted with the American healthcare system and disenchanted with the ways my fellow citizens and our policy makers are influenced by the almighty dollar. It's sad and pathetic, and no solution seems in sight...

573 agree | 384 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., May. 28, 2007 re: "Stinks ahoy: ‘Pirates’ a three-hour wreck"

Jackie said:
I love4 you Johnny and please make more films with you as the pirate I think you are the greattest

590 agree | 364 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)