CHANGE MY LOCATION
Local
California News
Multimedia News
Fine of $50,000 for illegal billboard a sign of stepped-up enforcement
SEE HOW THIS STORY DEVELOPED
Related Topics: SAN FRANCISCO
)
This billboard is one of 96 The City wants removed.
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - A private homeowner was fined $50,000 after he refused to remove an illegal billboard from his freeway-fronting house, as a result of a legal ruling that’s expected to boost The City’s quest to cleanse San Francisco of hundreds of advertising signs that are up without permits.
Late last year, the San Francisco Planning Department began enforcement of a 2002 voter-approved ballot initiative that banned new outdoor advertising signs. Additionally, signs installed before 2002 without a permit are considered illegal as a result of a law passed in 2006 by the Board of Supervisors.
Of the 1,464 outdoor advertising signs identified across The City, the department has ordered 96 removed, found 159 to be “generally legal” and more than 1,000 are still under review, according to city Senior Planner Dan Sider.
Sider said 59 signs have already been torn down. “It’s the tip of the iceberg, but it’s a tangible, physical change,” Sider said.
Hector Navarro appealed against a December order to remove a 48-foot-wide advertising sign from the top floor of his house on Folsom Street near U.S. Highway 101, court documents show. Advertisements have been painted or posted on the weatherboard home since the mid-1950s, the documents show.
On Wednesday, administrative law Judge Peter Kearns upheld The City’s order to remove the sign and he imposed a minimum fine of $50,000 against Navarro for refusing to do so. Navarro must also pay $3,400 in appeal fees.
Navarro’s attorney, Gerald Murphy, told The Examiner he expects to appeal the ruling. “We believe it’s unconstitutional,” he said.
“People were expecting Clear Channel and CBS to take the hammer — not a regular guy,” Murphy said.
San Francisco Beautiful Executive Director Dee Dee Workman said the ruling would help send a “really strong” message to advertisers and property owners.
“I think they can see that The City is not messing around anymore,” Workman said.
Comments from Examiner Readers
2:13 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Fine of $50,000 for illegal billboard a sign of stepped-up enforcement"
Report as inappropriate
11:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Fine of $50,000 for illegal billboard a sign of stepped-up enforcement"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Instead of raising the neighborhood street cleaning fines by $10, why doesn't the city do more $50,000 collections on illegal signs? Also, I do not understand how the review process can be so complicated. According to the article, any sign without a permit, according to the law passed in 2006 by the Board of Supervisors, is in violation of the law and subject to fine. The SF Planning Department should have a list of permits and associated addresses. Every other sign is in violation. How could it be more complicated than that?
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I'm glad the city is finally following through on what the public voted for in 2002. It's about time. Jane Winslow
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree