Rainy-day fund offers silver lining
Article History
There are updates to this article.
The Board of Supervisors approved the use of rainy-day funds for schools, sparing teachers from layoffs.
(Examiner file photo)
The Board of Supervisors approved the use of rainy-day funds for schools, sparing teachers from layoffs.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - The jobs of 535 San Francisco public school teachers and administrators have been spared as a result of a city promise to give the cash-strapped district $18 million to $20 million.

However, school officials say they’ll still have to make $13 million or more in cuts in other areas of the budget.

State law requires schools to notify teachers by March 15 if they face possible layoffs; final notices are due by May 15.

The allocation of the one-time funding, from San Francisco’s rainy-day reserves, was approved unanimously by the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.

San Francisco Unified School District Superintendent Carlos Garcia said the money should be enough to pay the salaries of the hundreds of faculty members who were issued the provisional pink slips.

As a result, none of the district’s teachers will receive the second, final notice that they’ve lost their job.

“We couldn’t be more excited that they rescinded all the pink slips for our wonderful teachers,” said CeCe Kaufman, whose son attends kindergarten at Sherman Elementary School.

However, the district bailout will not completely fill the cuts anticipated from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed state budget, which will be revised next week.

The jobs of 85 teachers aides, who received layoff notices in April, still remain at risk until Schwarzenegger’s updated budget emerges, according to Garcia.

“We still have a $13 million hole, and what’s left to cut?” Garcia said. “The City has helped us for one year, but next year will be worse.”

Myong Leigh, finance director for the district, which serves approximately 55,000 students, said school officials were considering a range of options for the cuts, including reducing central office jobs and trimming transportation funding.

Schwarzenegger’s proposed 2008-09 California budget, revealed in January, proposed a 10 percent reduction to education funding — the equivalent of an $800 cut per pupil, according to the California Department of Education.

Statewide, 18,000 to 20,000 teachers, staff and administrators received layoff warnings in March.

“This move was important to Mayor Newsom, even though The City has a very large deficit,” said Hydra Mendoza, Mayor Gavin Newsom’s education adviser and a school board member, referring to The City’s projected $305 million budget shortfall for next fiscal year.

With the news came high praise for Supervisor Tom Ammiano, who authored the 2003 legislation creating the rainy-day reserve, now up to $122 million, 25 percent of which can go to schools.

“If anything is going to work smoothly between City Hall and the district, it’s when both of us are on the same page,” Ammiano said.

bwinegarner@examiner.com

A reprieve for teachers

The San Francisco Unified School District averted laying off educators for next year.

» $18 million to $20 million: Funds the district will receive from The City’s rainy-day fund

» $13 million: Shortfall district says it may still have

» 535: Notices of possible layoffs sent out in March

Cuts school officials are still considering

» Central office jobs

» Layoffs for 85 teachers aides

» Transportation funding

Source: San Francisco Unified School District


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:20 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 25, 2008 re: "Lottery for school assignment comes under fire"

miyoko said:
I just recieved a letter from SFUSD that they made an error and need to re assign my child to different school. This is only one month left before school starts. So outrageous. We already got involved with the school that we thought our daughe was going to. We met principle, teachers and all the parents and kids that involves in school. We paid non refundable tuition for afterschool program that the bus goes from there. We are sooo upset about SFUSD unproffesionalizm and poor organization skill. It is a big change for kids to attend a new school. We visited the school many times and organized play dates with new comers. We made a difficult decision picking a right afterschool program that bus goes to. Finally we are feeling comfortable for our child to start a new life at this new school. I hope that we can raise our voice.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:11 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008 re: "Funds sinking alongside enrollment"

Examiner Reader said:
I think the writer may have missed a more interesting angle. According to the public data from the California Department of Education, San Francisco’s public high schools continue to be an entry point to the public school system rather than an exit point. To illustrate this point, here is the SFUSD’s enrollment data for the past several years, taken from the CDE website (www.cde.ca.gov): 2007-2008: 5,529 9th graders 2006-07: 6,030 9th graders and 3,982 8th graders 2005-06: 6,050 9th and 4,273 8th 2004-05: 5,438 9th and 4,196 8th Comparing any given year’s 8th grade SFUSD enrollment to the following year’s 9th grade SFUSD enrollment, it becomes clear than several hundred students ENTER the public school system for high school, presumably from private or parochial middle schools. The fact that, for each of the last three years, over 1,500 students ENTERED the SFUSD for 9th grade is a very significant and positive message about the quality of the public high schools

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:30 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Lottery for school assignment comes under fire"

Neighborhood Schools = Segregation said:
Odd that a city that prides itself on progressivism and projects itself as a paragon of diversity is so severely Balkanized. Calls emanating from some communities demanding "neighborhood schools" are thinly-veiled appeals for ethnic and class segregation. I attended hearings at the SFUSD a few years back and was shocked when some Chinese-American parents (frequently thru interpreters) insisted that they did not want their kids, described as model scholars who respected their parents and teachers and were hungry to learn, to study alongside black and Latino/Chicano children, characterized as brutal thugs with a profound aversion to discipline and education. I was shocked by their ignorance and racism, but perhaps not terribly surprised. Such scenarios once more expose San Francisco as a provincial little town rife with racialized tensions, despite its veneer of sophistication, urbanism and tolerance.

4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:30 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Lottery for school assignment comes under fire"

Neighborhood Schools = Segregation said:
Odd that a city that prides itself on progressivism and projects itself as a paragon of diversity is so severely Balkanized. Calls emanating from some communities demanding "neighborhood schools" are thinly-veiled appeals for ethnic and class segregation. I attended hearings at the SFUSD a few years back and was shocked when some Chinese-American parents (frequently thru interpreters) insisted that they did not want their kids, described as model scholars who respected their parents and teachers and were hungry to learn, to study alongside black and Latino/Chicano children, characterized as brutal thugs with a profound aversion to discipline and education. I was shocked by their ignorance and racism, but perhaps not terribly surprised. Such scenarios once more expose San Francisco as a provincial little town rife with racialized tensions, despite its veneer of sophistication, urbanism and tolerance.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:37 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "Lottery for school assignment comes under fire"

Examiner Reader said:
The lottery system is not the answer. Maybe instead of busing children in order to integrate schools, we could reapply the $7 million saved to improve the low performing schools. ($5 million busing + $2 million staffing). Both my children were in the 37% that did not get into their first choice for school. That makes me less inclined to contribute any money to their school's requests for donations of $250 - $500/year.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:17 AM MST on Tue., May. 20, 2008 re: "Lowell High named among nation’s best"

Examiner Reader said:
Lowell has always been the best high school the City has to offer. It's too bad the Stupid Board of Education looks at Lowell as the ugly step sister (e.g., no funding for improvements, always trying to canabalize the admission process, trying to fix things that aren't broken etc.).

9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)