Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty
Article History
There are updates to this article.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Anyone who displays artwork that shows animal cruelty could wind up behind bars as the result of a proposed law that comes in the wake of a controversial exhibit that was shut down because of public outrage.

The so-called Humanitarian Art Ordinance would allow the district attorney to bring charges against the artist who created the images of animal cruelty and the person putting the work on display, according to Christine Garcia, author of the law and an Animal Control and Welfare commissioner.

“Glamorizing crimes of animal cruelty isn’t a good idea because it might encourage more people to pick up that idea,” Garcia said.

Garcia said she has proposed the law in response to a San Francisco Art Institute exhibitthat opened in March and consisted of videos that showed six animals — a sheep, a horse, an ox, a pig, a goat and a doe — being struck and killed by a hammer.

On March 29, the exhibit was closed, a decision that, the Art Institute said, was “in response to a series of violent threats by animal-rights extremists.”

The Animal Control and Welfare Commission will discuss the proposed law today at City Hall.

The proposal requires that if someone displays a photograph or video of an act of animal cruelty that violates federal, state or local laws, and if the person who took the photograph or video helped in any way with the abuse, both could be charged with a felony.

The proposed law is supported by San Rafael-based animal-rights group In Defense of Animals.

“Animals should not suffer or die to make art whether for a video, photograph, sculpture or any other type of art,” In Defense of Animals President Elliot Katz said in a statement.

The proposed law also would require approval by the Board of Supervisors.

jsabatini@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:51 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
This is MAYHEM! What ever happened to freedom of speech? The individuals who actually struck the animals to death should be prosecuted (perhaps it was the artist), but you can't send someone to jail for showing the world know it happened. Hey, writing is a form of art--should reporting it be illegal? And Animal Rights materials aren't "propaganda" - propaganda implies it's in some way untrue. Just because you don't like the truth, and you'd be happier not having to deal with your own conscience, does not make the truth propaganda.

3 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:54 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Act aims for animal-abuse artists"

Debby said:
The people who run that gallery should be taking a long hard look at their personal morality. What disfunction of their collective brains suggested that these videos constituted "art"in any sense? As for the person (was it the"artist") who made the video, well, he should be arrested and charged along with the individuals involved in the killings for killings sake.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:46 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Act aims for animal-abuse artists"

Examiner Reader said:
I've been waiting a long time to see PETA and other animal rights activists STOP displaying the horrible acts of cruelty. I understand the impact of such propaganda but as a supporter of these types of organizations I find this kind of display nauseating and grotesque. If this law STOPS this kind of display I'm for it.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:26 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
While animal abuse is wrong and perpetrators should be punished, I'm more deeply concerned that so many people confusing the illegal with the immoral. Americans have the right to only be tried for the crimes they commit (such as animal abuse), not the crimes they might commit in the future (such as child abuse, as other readers quite groundlessly suggest). Nor should an artist who simply *documented* animal abuse be punished. Civil liberties — like freedom of speech — is vital to a democracy, even if it allows extremists to make blatantly moralizing, unfounded allegations.

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:54 PM MST on Sat., May. 10, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

Scott Enk said:
This woman needs to wise up. If, as it is alleged, the "man" involved, Ariel Alcides Aspedilla, indeed did what he is accused of doing to a defenseless Chihuahua, he can do such things to people as well--*including her and the child to come*. If he is found guilty, she should not only refuse to forgive him, but cut him out of her life forever. Animal abuse, particularly when as heinous as is alleged here or when repeated, calls, not for forgiveness or namby-pamby "understanding," but savage punishment, including not only stiff prison time, but social ostracism and, yes, hatred. If there is a hell, there is a very special place reserved there for those who do such things as the defendant in this case is accused of doing. And they fully belong there. In this life, they must also receive all the justice the law allows us to give them. As with those who abuse children or other family members, only when animal abusers are punished as they deserve will we start to see such abuse declin

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:54 PM MST on Sat., May. 10, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
The next step for this sick type of person would be to use humans maybe babies or small children next instead of animals and try and make it ok because it is "art". passing laws would be a good thing to stop animal cruelty for being passed off as "art". It is not art. It takes NO talent at all to do horrible things to another living creature. This person is just trying to justify their evil nature by calling it art.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:37 PM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

Examiner Reader said:
Anyone that has that much anger towards a defenseless animal definetly has anger management issues. The fact that this young women chooses to stay with this individual just because she is pregnant is amazing. I would say she has self esteem issues.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:03 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
the art institute is really a non-instructional fine arts college, so it's not surprising it will present what is considered art when it's not. having been there only briefly, I would say much of their art among the students is borderline pornography. consequently their exhibitions are without forethought.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:10 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

L. Herman said:
I'd think this woman should be afraid for her future baby. If he can kick a 10 lb. dog to death! then he will eventually hurt a child. What a stupid woman. Shame on her.

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "Brothers indicted on animal cruelty, dog fighting charges"

Timiche said:
I feel that dog fighting should not be taken lighthly. It is a serious form of animal cruelty and those who participate in this act should be charged for attemted murder. I so love dogs.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:16 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 24, 2007 re: "Three Arizona crimes makes list of 100 worst animal cruelty cases"

Examiner Reader said:
i agree with nancy altmix 100%, those people are evil and the place for evil is in hell.

35 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:50 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 24, 2007 re: "Three Arizona crimes makes list of 100 worst animal cruelty cases"

NANCY ALTMIX said:
I COULD HARDLY FINISH READING IT I WAS CRYING SO HARD! PLEASE EVERYBODY, IF YOU KNOW OF ANY ANIMALS BEING ABUSED GET AHOLD OF THE AUTHORITIES,IT WILL ONLY TAKE A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME,I WISH PEOPLE WHO ABUSE ANIMALS WOULD JUST GO TO HELL RIGHT NOW,BUT FIRST MAKE THEM SUFFER THE WAY THEY DID THE ANIMALS! I HATE PEOPLE THAT ABUSE ANIMALS! PLEASE EVEN IF YOU SEE AN ANIMAL LEFT OUTSIDE IN HOT OR COLD WEATHER CHAINED WITH NO WATER TELL AUTHORITIES, AND JUST MAYBE A FEW PRECIOUS FUR ANGELS WON'T HAVE TO SUFFER!!!!

38 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)