Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog
Article History
There are updates to this article.

REDWOOD CITY (Map, News) - The case against a man accused of kicking his girlfriend’s dog to death has bite behind the bark, prosecutors say.

Ariel Aspedilla, 26, of Manteca, was in court Wednesday to face felony animal abuse charges in a case that has triggered nearly 500 e-mails to the District Attorney’s Office.

Aspedilla has pleaded not guilty to two counts of animal cruelty in the death of Chiquita, a 5-year-old, 10-pound Chihuahua-miniature pinscher mix.

Prosecutors say Aspedilla was alone with Chiquita in his girlfriend’s Redwood City apartment when he kicked the dog four or five times after it soiled the bed.

The kicks from the 6-foot-1-inch, 160-pound man fractured five of Chiquita’s ribs, punctured her lungs and damaged her liver, according to prosecutors. The dog died shortly after reaching an animal hospital.

Aspedilla’s girlfriend, 22-year-old Elyssa Palmer, testified at a preliminary hearing Wednesday that she left work March 6 after Aspedilla called to tell her Chiquita was sick. Palmer described finding the dog limp and then rushing her to a vet.

Aspedilla confessed to her later that day that he had “budged” Chiquita several times with his foot, then kicked her once, Palmer said.

Outside of court, Palmer said she had forgiven Aspedilla. The two are expecting a child together.

“I know this man. He is very family-oriented. He loves kids and he has a dog of his own that he loves. This was a freak accident that happened in the heat of the moment,” she said.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Steve Wagstaffe said his office has received nearly 500 e-mails with the same subject line: “Please ensure justice for Chiquita.”

“Nearly all of the e-mails are from San Mateo County citizens,” Wagstaffe said. “I tell them they can rest assured we’ll seek justice in this case as we do in any case.”

Aspedilla faces three years in prison if convicted. He remains in jail on $50,000 bail.

tbarak@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

12:51 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
This is MAYHEM! What ever happened to freedom of speech? The individuals who actually struck the animals to death should be prosecuted (perhaps it was the artist), but you can't send someone to jail for showing the world know it happened. Hey, writing is a form of art--should reporting it be illegal? And Animal Rights materials aren't "propaganda" - propaganda implies it's in some way untrue. Just because you don't like the truth, and you'd be happier not having to deal with your own conscience, does not make the truth propaganda.

3 agree | 21 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:54 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "Act aims for animal-abuse artists"

Debby said:
The people who run that gallery should be taking a long hard look at their personal morality. What disfunction of their collective brains suggested that these videos constituted "art"in any sense? As for the person (was it the"artist") who made the video, well, he should be arrested and charged along with the individuals involved in the killings for killings sake.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:46 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008 re: "Act aims for animal-abuse artists"

Examiner Reader said:
I've been waiting a long time to see PETA and other animal rights activists STOP displaying the horrible acts of cruelty. I understand the impact of such propaganda but as a supporter of these types of organizations I find this kind of display nauseating and grotesque. If this law STOPS this kind of display I'm for it.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:26 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
While animal abuse is wrong and perpetrators should be punished, I'm more deeply concerned that so many people confusing the illegal with the immoral. Americans have the right to only be tried for the crimes they commit (such as animal abuse), not the crimes they might commit in the future (such as child abuse, as other readers quite groundlessly suggest). Nor should an artist who simply *documented* animal abuse be punished. Civil liberties — like freedom of speech — is vital to a democracy, even if it allows extremists to make blatantly moralizing, unfounded allegations.

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:54 PM MST on Sat., May. 10, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

Scott Enk said:
This woman needs to wise up. If, as it is alleged, the "man" involved, Ariel Alcides Aspedilla, indeed did what he is accused of doing to a defenseless Chihuahua, he can do such things to people as well--*including her and the child to come*. If he is found guilty, she should not only refuse to forgive him, but cut him out of her life forever. Animal abuse, particularly when as heinous as is alleged here or when repeated, calls, not for forgiveness or namby-pamby "understanding," but savage punishment, including not only stiff prison time, but social ostracism and, yes, hatred. If there is a hell, there is a very special place reserved there for those who do such things as the defendant in this case is accused of doing. And they fully belong there. In this life, they must also receive all the justice the law allows us to give them. As with those who abuse children or other family members, only when animal abusers are punished as they deserve will we start to see such abuse declin

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:54 PM MST on Sat., May. 10, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
The next step for this sick type of person would be to use humans maybe babies or small children next instead of animals and try and make it ok because it is "art". passing laws would be a good thing to stop animal cruelty for being passed off as "art". It is not art. It takes NO talent at all to do horrible things to another living creature. This person is just trying to justify their evil nature by calling it art.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:37 PM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

Examiner Reader said:
Anyone that has that much anger towards a defenseless animal definetly has anger management issues. The fact that this young women chooses to stay with this individual just because she is pregnant is amazing. I would say she has self esteem issues.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:03 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Activists on prowl for artists showing animal cruelty"

Examiner Reader said:
the art institute is really a non-instructional fine arts college, so it's not surprising it will present what is considered art when it's not. having been there only briefly, I would say much of their art among the students is borderline pornography. consequently their exhibitions are without forethought.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:10 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Woman stands by man accused of killing her dog"

L. Herman said:
I'd think this woman should be afraid for her future baby. If he can kick a 10 lb. dog to death! then he will eventually hurt a child. What a stupid woman. Shame on her.

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008 re: "Brothers indicted on animal cruelty, dog fighting charges"

Timiche said:
I feel that dog fighting should not be taken lighthly. It is a serious form of animal cruelty and those who participate in this act should be charged for attemted murder. I so love dogs.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:16 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 24, 2007 re: "Three Arizona crimes makes list of 100 worst animal cruelty cases"

Examiner Reader said:
i agree with nancy altmix 100%, those people are evil and the place for evil is in hell.

35 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:50 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 24, 2007 re: "Three Arizona crimes makes list of 100 worst animal cruelty cases"

NANCY ALTMIX said:
I COULD HARDLY FINISH READING IT I WAS CRYING SO HARD! PLEASE EVERYBODY, IF YOU KNOW OF ANY ANIMALS BEING ABUSED GET AHOLD OF THE AUTHORITIES,IT WILL ONLY TAKE A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME,I WISH PEOPLE WHO ABUSE ANIMALS WOULD JUST GO TO HELL RIGHT NOW,BUT FIRST MAKE THEM SUFFER THE WAY THEY DID THE ANIMALS! I HATE PEOPLE THAT ABUSE ANIMALS! PLEASE EVEN IF YOU SEE AN ANIMAL LEFT OUTSIDE IN HOT OR COLD WEATHER CHAINED WITH NO WATER TELL AUTHORITIES, AND JUST MAYBE A FEW PRECIOUS FUR ANGELS WON'T HAVE TO SUFFER!!!!

38 agree | 34 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)