
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Mayor Adrian Fenty’s budget chief suggested Tuesday that the answer to a growing 2009 budget deficit may be raising a tax on corporate property and delaying tax relief on local businesses.
William Singer, in a memo to City Administrator Dan Tangherlini, summed up the $130 million gap matter-of-factly: “Since the 2009 budget was released, the national economic picture has not improved.” Chief Financial Officer Natwar Gandhi’s latest forecast paints an unpleasant picture — $35 million less revenue in 2009 than his February estimates.
Gandhi briefed the D.C. Council on the new numbers Wednesday. Council members then spent more than six hours in meetings, discussing among other items how to fill the new gap. Sources close to those deliberations said the council would likely use a combination of reserve funds, excess 2008 revenues and revenues derived from a doubling of the cigarette tax to make up the difference.
Council Chairman Vincent Gray declined comment and ordered his colleagues not to divulge any details, city hall sources said.
“We did not reduce services,” said Ward 6 Councilman Tommy Wells.
The economic news from Gandhi was bad across the board. The sales of single-family homes and condominiums in the first quarter of 2008 fell by 26.6 percent and 42.6 percent, respectively. The commercial vacancy rate climbed slightly from 6.4 percent to 6.5 percent. And the value of property sold declined by 47.6 percent.
For 2009, Gandhi projected a $57.7 million decline in sales tax revenues, a $45.1 million drop in individual income tax revenues and a $12.9 million dip in the business income tax haul.
In his memo, Singer suggested the District could collect $5 million next year if it raises the economic interest tax — a tax calculated on the value of property owned by corporations in the city — from 2.2 percent to 2.9 percent.
Another $15 million could be saved by eliminating a set aside in the budget for small-business tax relief. “We may reach a point where suspending implementation … is a prudent option,” Singer said.
And D.C. could save millions if it cuts back on discretionary grants to community groups totaling more than $25 million, Singer wrote. It may be necessary, he said, “to re-evaluate whether discretionary grants are the kind of expense we can afford.”
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
12:53 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "$5.77 billion ’09 budget gets approval"
Report as inappropriate
11:00 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008
re: "D.C.’s budget has tax relief, though level in doubt"
Report as inappropriate
9:11 AM MST on Tue., May. 13, 2008
re: "D.C.’s budget has tax relief, though level in doubt"
Report as inappropriate
4:20 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008
re: "D.C. Council tearing apart Mayor’s proposed budget"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Councilman: Accounting failures threaten District budget reforms"
Report as inappropriate
4:45 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Councilman: Accounting failures threaten District budget reforms"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Yet another $56 million for a bunch of social programs. Just how much money do we need to drain from taxpayers? Taxpayer rage? That's a joke, and Council members know that no matter what they do, DC voters, with short memories, will just roll over and reelect them again...and again...and again.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Brian said:
Cutting taxes in DC across the board is the only way to stop these compulsive spenders from throwing money away year after year after year.
0 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Mike Licht said:
Re: D.C.’s budget has tax relief, though level in doubt -- The $10 million grant to Ford's Theatre is sailing right through, despite widespread public rage. I guess council members don't plan to run for re-election.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Roberta Carroll said:
Mary Cheh did not follow the process to add 3 amendments to close Klingle Road. Ms. Cheh does not represent what is best for the environment, transportation or the District and the majority of her ward. There are 13 acres of open green space beside Klingle Road, we don't need more in Ward 3. Ms. Cheh will lose this land that was given to DC as a highway forever in 1885. A hike/bike path in the middle of a road makes no logical sense.
0 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
stinkeye said:
according to Gandhi, mother harriet's theft of funds are "not considered quantitatively ‘material’ in relation to the District’s overall budget.” want to know how we have been impacted? 50 mil could buy a few shiny new schools, pay a few police officers, fix our libraries & parks...not 'material'...how obnoxious.
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
There has been such a lack of attention focused on what the accounting scandal means to DC residents, and the budget. It's all about how daring Harriett what's her name was, and that sort of thing. Well, how have we been IMPACTED? What is the effect of all this in nuts and bolts terms?
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree