Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - The means for residents to comment on Howard’s development decisions often already exist — but finding the ways to do so can be nearly impossible, said members of a task force examining participation in land-use issues.

“Too often people come in at the tail end of the process, and then they want to be heard,” said William Erskine, a land-use lawyer and co-chairman of the Public Engagement in Land Use task force.

For example, many residents lament the long hours they spend looking for planning information online, Erskine said.

But they can sign up through the county’s Web site, howardcountymd.gov/DPZ/DPZ_HomePage.htm, for electronic notifications, he said.

In its final report released this week, the task force recommended ways to improve communications between county planners and residents, a persistent concern among Howard residents.

Topping the recommendations was creating a brochure outlining how to file an appeal and receive notices on a particular project and a summary of land-use principles.

The 23-member group — consisting of members of the development community and residents, who tend to be on opposite sides of the land-use debate — met for about four months.

“There is a clear need to provide information in an easily accessible format to interested individuals and community organizations,” the task force wrote in the final report.

Also included in the final report were recommendations that didn’t have unanimous support from members.

For example, all but one member agreed that a public committee or task force should be convened to weigh in early on major land-use legislation.

The county has consulted a committee in some cases, such as with downtown Columbia planning, but not in others, such as with legislation to create a design panel for new development.

“Public hearings are a minimalist way to get public input. They are not substitute for conferring with representatives of the public in the formative stages,” said Bridget Mugane, a task force member and president of the Howard County Citizens Association.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:13 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "Howard land-use group releases recommendations to involve public"

Examiner Reader said:
This task force was heavily skewed toward the land development community.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:25 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008 re: "Two Council proposals take aim at the ‘infill’ development"

Examiner Reader said:
We are an extremly confused nation. We are not creating new urban areas, we are growing by about 2 million people a year, we want affordable housing, we want long time resident to never have to move, we don't want change or more density with 'infill', we want continued mass immigration -- often the same people and political parties are for all these things.

72 agree | 66 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:13 AM MST on Sun., Feb. 3, 2008 re: "Ulman seeks to scrap plans for new government campus"

Examiner Reader said:
I can't believe Ulman would waste over $7 million by abandoning plans, while at the same time giving his donor buddy a sweetheart lease with County funds. Wait a minute - I can believe it because Ulman is a deceptive arrogant jerk who slanders Mary Kay Sigaty to steal an election.

84 agree | 85 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:29 PM MST on Fri., Jan. 11, 2008 re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"

Examiner Reader said:
"Traffic engineers wouldn’t stay in business if they used false assumptions or data" Why not? Politicians stay in business when they use false data on their resumes. "Secretary of the Cabinet" anyone?

86 agree | 90 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:34 AM MST on Thu., Jan. 10, 2008 re: "Howard residents question traffic studies’ credibility"

Examiner Reader said:
Any protests to traffic conditions, etc., under Howard County's new administration will be ignored. What Mr. Ulman wants, Mr. Ulman will get. Remember this the next time you go to the polls.

87 agree | 80 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:09 AM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007 re: "Council questions office-space purchase"

Examiner Reader said:
Doesn't a contributor to Ulman own the building where Ulman wants to sign an overpriced lease? But, just because someone fakes their resume to get elected, doesn't mean they will continue their dishonesty once in office...

107 agree | 104 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)