Volkswagen enters the haus
Article History
There are updates to this article.
A huge mock jersey displaying the new Volkswagen logo sits on the bleachers as DC United players warm up at RFK Stadium. United and VW announced a five-year partnership agreement on Tuesday. — Andrew Harnik/Examiner

A huge mock jersey displaying the new Volkswagen logo sits on the bleachers as DC United players warm up at RFK Stadium. United and VW announced a five-year partnership agreement on Tuesday. — Andrew Harnik/Examiner

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The black 1964 Volkswagen Beetle driven up the narrow access ramp inside RFK Stadium and parked outside D.C. United’s mezzanine-level VIP lounge was immediate and unmistakable. The car, which currently stars in national advertisements, was a sign that the five-year partnership between the team and club announced Tuesday has ushered in a new era for Major League Soccer’s most storied franchise.

The deal will earn United in excess of $14 million, according to those familiar with the agreement, reflecting itself not only on United’s jersey, which now bears the automaker’s logo, but throughout the club and RFK Stadium.

A massive banner-sized jersey was stretched across RFK’s east stands, and construction was underway behind the north goal of the Volkswagen Garage, an interactive hospitality area and showroom that will debut Thursday along with United’s new uniform.

“The jersey sponsorship or partnership is very unique in sports,” said United president and CEO Kevin Payne, who decided a year and a half ago to begin the pursuit of a jersey sponsor. “Probably the only thing that’s comparable would be maybe a NASCAR team, where the company and the team become so identified with one another. It was important to us to have the right partner, and we think we got absolutely the right partner.”

The deal also includes a one-year sponsorship with MLS, but Volkswagen of America CEO Stefan Jacoby expected it to extend further.

“We are developing the core values of football,” said Jacoby. “The tradition of the club, that kind of proudness that the club has, when you see the jerseys and the uniforms. ... These are values that are totally in line with our values as well.”

The agreement will not allow United, which has perennially operated at a loss, to turn a profit.

“It helps bridge the gap,” said United co-managing partner Victor MacFarlane. “Until we have a stadium, it’s just not going to happen.”

United head coach Tom Soehn, who speaks German, and midfielder Ben Olsen, said the jerseys looked beautiful.

“It shows that our sport is going in the right direction,” said Olsen. “To be a part of this for a long time, and to see no sponsors, the bare-bones stuff, and to see a legitimate, big-time company like VW come in and commit themselves to the league, and in particular our team, it’s just nice.”


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:04 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Economists blast plans for public subsidy to help fund new D.C. United stadium"

TTT said:
As a fan I am sick of DC Govt and other anti United and its stadium plans. Although I wish there is a way to remain the team in the District, but with their devil spirit, I urge the team to move out of this place. Let hem sit on the empty rotten feild and be miserable forever.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:57 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Economists blast plans for public subsidy to help fund new D.C. United stadium"

RSS said:
It is amazing that such irresponsible journalism is tolerated and that reports by agenda-driven groups are presented as fact and without critical analysis or contrary opinions solicited. For starters, any analysis that is worth presenting is based on facts which are utterly lacking and wrong in this case. This facility will be used many more times than the "fewer than 30" used in the analysis. In fact, the number is likely to be more than double the figure provided in the "analysis". So-called analysis that is based on assumptions that are demonstrably off by a factor of nearly 2 is irresponsible. Reporting irresponsible data without analysis is irresponsible reporting. This could have been determined by cursory evaluation of any number of readily-available sources. If the lack of real journalism in this article is representative of the quality of the Examiner, you are in a sorry state, indeed.

11 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:17 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Bordering on new territory"

dee said:
TFC is a much better team then D.C united. The only player D.C has that is close to real football material is Emilio. He has had flashes of world class striking, but with D.C shallow depth, he is not receiving the proper service. If D.C has any hopes for this season, they need to keep Moreno on the bench, and play the young guns like Quaranta and Emilio. And focus around Gallardo because he is the root of most of D.C`s goals. Regardless, D.C, can not compare to a revamped Toronto FC. Toronto outskills them by a long shot. But D.C can still hope.

8 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:31 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Immigration refined"

Cohen said:
The South Americans are bringing class to the league. I can't wait for the new season to start this Saturday!

9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:58 PM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008 re: "United deep in the heart of Texas"

Nancy McBeth said:
The city this contest takes place in is named Cibolo not Cebolo. Please correct. Thank you.

9 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:43 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"

Examiner Reader said:
Absolutely, totally, completely and inexcusably obscene. Especially in the current economic climate, no municipality, or state for that matter, should be spending public money on sports stadiums owned by people who can afford to build their own facilities. Fix the schools, roads, bridges, hospitals, etc., first.

68 agree | 77 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:46 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"

Bob in Manassas said:
"If DC United wanted a soccer stadium, it should have done what business people do: ask for a loan from private industry to be repaid with interest." D.C. United did come with a plan and even did the leg work to get the Polar Point land. The catch was the infrastructure support (about $200 mil) for mixed use development similar to what Clark has proposed ... except the Clark project will need $500 million kicked in from the city. I do not know about your math mine says that Fenty is a dope.

72 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:32 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"

Examiner Reader said:
Fenty should have told DC United to pay for its own stadium, but that would have required courage and principles. Fenty is not spending his own money nor is Fenty asking that DC residents pitch in; this is the taxpayers money that should be going towards the necessary functions of the city. Essentially we are being coerced into financing this stadium. If you think otherwise, deduct your share for the stadium from your taxes and tell DC you aren't paying for it. You can write to me detailing the success of your defiance from your holding cell. If DC United wanted a soccer stadium, it should have done what business people do: ask for a loan from private industry to be repaid with interest.

89 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:15 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "United gets the ultimate Valentine’s gift"

Examiner Reader said:
To be honest, the Nats and United belonged in VA. They are the real ones that are floating both teams. Just being honest!

71 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Taxpayers to foot $150M of D.C. United stadium costs"

Examiner Reader said:
I am glad to see that the Mayor is doing the right thing after screwing United and the groups that did all the work in promoting ACTUAL development in Anacostia. Hell, United won the support of Marion Barry … I do not see how this is a better deal for the city. The city will be putting up twice as much money as McFarlane / AEG initially requested for the Poplar Point site improvements. Not only is the city is to pay more for site improvements but will also plus kick in money for the stadium; sounds like the over pay approach that the city specializes in. Way to go Mayor Fenty ...

69 agree | 69 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:52 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "United considers stadium site outside D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
Fairfax United? Gimme a break. They're not going anywhere. They're trying to force the issue. What sucks for DC United is that soccer isn't baseball, I'd love if they stayed in DC but nobody is going to the mat to give them a sweetheart deal like the Nats got.

246 agree | 246 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:35 AM MST on Fri., Oct. 12, 2007 re: "United considers stadium site outside D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
Yes let's have DC United in Northern Virginia where they will be treated better.

240 agree | 233 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:26 AM MST on Thu., Oct. 11, 2007 re: "United considering stadium site outside D.C."

Developersagent.com said:
Its about time someone took a stand in support of Poplar Point & the DC United Stadium besides Marion Barry (whose track record is not the cleanest to say the least). Poplar Point should go to DC United.

403 agree | 267 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:28 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "Red Bulls resurgence not a Cosmos revival"

Examiner Reader said:
Red Bull NY is not tied for MLS's best record, they in fact top the table with 10 points and a plus 5 goal differential, as oppossed to Chicago Fire FC, who sit second with 10 points and a +3 GD.

745 agree | 390 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:16 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "United: Time for some action"

Examiner Reader said:
Carroll should have been yanked last season. “Everybody needs to be held accountable,” Maybe Soehn should take a good look at himself, the past 2 games is about as bad as you can coach a team.

558 agree | 451 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:30 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 19, 2007 re: "A United market"

PJohnson said:
Hey Craig, It is not proper to refer to DC United as "the United". It's not a nickname. It's the club name. Call them DC United, or simply United. Learn it, Live it, LOVE IT!

465 agree | 451 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)