Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Neighborhood groups are concerned about inconsistencies in plans for Presidio’s historical Main Post.
(Courtesy rendering)
Neighborhood groups are concerned about inconsistencies in plans for Presidio’s historical Main Post.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - As development proposals for the Presidio continue to raise eyebrows from the public, nearby neighborhood groups are pining to re-establish a dormant watchdog group so they can offer their opinions on the new changes at the former Army post.

The Presidio Neighborhood Representative Work Group, a collective of nearby neighborhood groups and city agencies, was first established in 2001.

The group was created as a way to offer streamlined feedback on new developments, particularly the proposal at the time to house George Lucas’ digital-arts center at the Letterman Complex, according to Nannie Turrell of the Planning Department.

The group met weekly and submitted formal comments to the Presidio Trust, the federally appointed group in charge of operations at the Presidio. Once the digital-arts center was approved the group ceased meeting, Turrell said.

Because the trust is set to release in June a Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement about developments on the Main Post — deemed necessary because new proposals for the site differ from the group’s original management plan — nearby neighborhood groups think it’s time for the group to reconvene.

“There has been a real popular upwelling of concerns about plans for the Main Post,” said David Bancroft of the Cow Hollow Association, one of several neighborhood groups slated for involvement in the group.

The neighborhood groups are concerned about a lack of public transportation in the Presidio and an incongruous mix of new additions to the Presidio’s historical Main Post, according to Martin Beresford of the Marina Community Association. A plan to house a modern-designed 100,000-square-foot museum featuring Gap founders Doris and Donald Fisher’s art collection in the Main Post is a particularly hot-topic item.

“It’s the wrong track for the Presidio,” Beresford said.

Museum spokesman Sam Singer said the Fishers “have received overwhelmingly positive support for the museum in the Presidio.”

Supervisor Michela Alioto-Pier’s office is working on a resolution to re-establish the PNRWG, which will include city agencies such as the Public Utilities Commission and the Municipal Transportation Agency. The resolution will go before the Board of Supervisors’ Rules Committee on May 15.

Dana Polk, spokeswoman for the Presidio Trust, said her organization looks forward to meeting with the neighborhood group.

“We expect the working group to be helpful,” Polk said. “It should help us work together more effectively.”

wreisman@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

10:45 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 15, 2008 re: "Public given voice for 45 more days"

Examiner Reader said:
How does this museum/hotel project fit into the current or historical tone of the Presidio? Simply put, it does not.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:49 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

parkpal said:
The fact is that the "preferred alternative" for the large art museum and hotel still chooses the awful location right next to the Spanish era presidio wall and the flagpole of a 200 year old National HIstoric Site. Why? Because Mr. Fisher says that he will take his marbles and play somewhere else if he cannot get that exact central location, where his huge white museum overwhelms the historic character to the Presidio. The Presidio is not some vacant lot to be played with by wealthy developers. It is sacred ground in the history of California and our nation. Save it from desecration.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:19 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "Plans paint new picture for art museum"

Examiner Reader said:
If Sam Singer is speaking for someone, you know that they are up to no good. When will the dung stuck to Singers' expensive shoes after stepping in it for his clients over and again stick to Singer?

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

Examiner Reader said:
How much city staff time and resources will go into this revived group? I am concerned that the city's minimal resources will be unnecessarily used to support neighborhood groups who are well organized and will surely submit comments to the Presidio Trust on their own anyway. I'm supportive of these groups sending the Trust their comments, but why does the city need to foot the bill?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:39 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

marian price said:
So Sam Singer says the Fishers have received overwhelming support for the idea. Are there any who are not employees or cronies of the Fishers who believe the majority of Park users will laud the replacement of open space and bowling alley for this purpose. Borrowing a word from an outspoken British critic of out-of-context architectural extravaganzas, it will be a carbuncle of the face of the Presidio.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Presidio plans spark outcry for resistance"

Examiner Reader said:
Once again, everyone, including Supervisor Alioto-Pier, should consider the concept of moving the bloody mess to Shorenstein's Pier 29-31 development where Donald Fisher could walk to visit his MGM Grand collection. Don't even have to alter the architect's drawings. I think it would be a great save for the Main Parade Ground!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

Examiner Reader said:
For two hundred years the parade ground area in the Presidio has been and historic landmark for San Francisco Residents. It is hard to understand the Presidio Trust allowing a hotel/theatre complex and now a modern monolithic art museum to desecrate this lovely site. I applaude the Service's decision. However, the Park Service has shown itself subject to political pressure in the past. Let us hope that it will continue its opposition to this ill conceived project. There are other areas of the Presidio, such as the area near Baker Beach, which have lovely views and easy access for these projects if they must be built. I really don't see the need for another hotel, there are several being built in SF, nor a movie complex in the Presidio. It is difficult to get there and more mutilation will be needed for traffic/parking. My wifes' and my family have lived here for well over a hundred years-we are dedicated to this unique city and its historic richness. Please restrain the P

8 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:06 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Museum plan for Presidio getting heat"

parkpal said:
It is about time that the Park Service asserted itself to protect the Presidio from development. It is a National Park, after all, and belongs to you and me, not a bunch of Bush political appointees who run the Presidio Trust like a business park. Go! Park Service!

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:16 PM MST on Tue., Feb. 26, 2008 re: "Lake needs cleanup, warnings, supe says"

Examiner Reader said:
I grew up near the lake. It is very dirty and the homeless wash themselves there.

44 agree | 35 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.13 seconds)