|
|
SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - With all due apologies to Ernest Hemingway and John Donne: “Ask not for whom Eight Belles toiled; she toiled for greed.”
Not her own, of course, but for the greed of the wealthy and elitist aristocrats who make up the “Sport of Kings,” which has deteriorated through the centuries into little more than officially sanctioned animal abuse for the entertainment and profit of humans.
No card-carrying PETA member am I, but the horrific death of the beautiful filly Eight Belles immediately following Saturday’s Kentucky Derby should once again raise questions about the abusive nature of the horse racing industry. And to date, the answers so often provided by the racing establishment have been woefully lacking in substance.
When the sport was so infamously jolted at the Preakness two years ago by the gruesome shattering of the right hind leg of Barbaro, the 2006 Derby winner, the owners, trainers and handlers of Barbaro and other horses assured us that the animals “love to run” and that they were never pushed beyond their own natural limits desire to compete. Saturday, after Eight Belles was put down (the horse racing term for mercy-killing a suffering horse) after breaking the ankles of both front legs, we heard more of the same:
“These things are our family, you know,” Eight Belles’ trainer, Larry Jones, said. “We put everything into it that we have and they’ve given us everything that they have. They put their life on the damn line, uh, and she was glad to do it!”
That last line bears repeating: “They put their life on the damn line ... and she was glad to do it.”
Now I don’t know a whole lot about the art of “horse whispering,” but unless it actually involves a filly such as Eight Belles speaking softly into the ear of her trainer, telling him how much she wants to be raced to brink of her own physical limitations, and beyond, then I’d sure like to know how Mr. Jones can so emphatically declare that she was “glad to do it.” And if horses love to run as much as these owners and trainers would have us believe, and if they are as “glad” to put their own lives on the line in the interest of winning a race (a concept they can’t possibly comprehend), then why on earth does the guy on its back have to incessantly beat it with a whip to make it go faster?
Seems to me that any animal that is beaten about the hind-quarters with a whip would run as fast as it could whether it wanted to or not. And they won’t necessarily be glad to do it.
The terrible injuries suffered by these glorious animals are becoming far too common. Beyond the high-profile injuries and subsequent deaths, suffered by Eight Belles and Barbaro in Triple Crown races, there are literally hundreds of career-ending, if not life-ending, injuries to horses across the United States each year. USA Today reports 55 equine deaths at one track alone, Del Mar, near San Diego, between 2004 and 2006, and the Washington Post reports 1.5 career ending breakdowns per 1,000 racing starts — or two everyday.
I would not be so presumptive as to suggest an outright ban on the sport, but I would hope that even the most involved horse racing fan would agree that some serious questions need to be answered. Exactly how many horses, racing with massive, oversized, muscular bodies on cocktail-straw legs, have to suffer agonizing, lethal injuries before someone realizes something has to change?
Eight Belles, along with countless other animals forced to perform for our amusement, deserves an answer.
Sports personality Bob Frantz is a regular contributor to The Examiner. E-mail him at bfrantz@examiner.com.
# 3,476 of 8,562 |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
Comments from Examiner Readers
4:30 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Frantz: Death of another horse raising more questions"
Report as inappropriate
1:27 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Frantz: Death of another horse raising more questions"
Report as inappropriate
11:25 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Frantz: Death of another horse raising more questions"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
To the first writer: Boxers at least can CHOOSE whether they want to pummel and be pummelled...I don't particularly think that boxing is a 'sport,' but then again, maybe I'm just a 'bleeding heart liberal' who still has a functioning brain. Horse racing will probably not face an outright ban, but these terrible injuries and deaths would occur far less frequently if these horses could be raced at 5 or older. I grew up with horses and have loved them all my life, and have seen countless times what they will endure from people. They are truly noble creatures and what people do to them is heartbreaking. Call me a 'bleeding heart liberal' if you must, but at least I have a heart.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why is it that every time a tragedy happens, some bleeding heart liberal wants to ban the activity it occured in? I suspose this guy wants to ban boxing too right? People have been killed in boxing and racing, so let's stop those sports. This is bullcrap
1 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is probably the best article on this subject that I have read. When I read the "she was glad to do it" comment, I almost lost my lunch; what a crock! The sport definitely needs to have changes made, starting with letting these animals reach maturity before racing. And Jones referring to the horses as "these things" is extraordinarily telling: he considers them to be inanimate objects lacking all feeling. They feel pain the same as humans do - and happiness and fear and fatigue. As long as this industry is allowed to legally continue the abuse of these magnificent animals, the U.S. has no right to call itself "great." The moral worth of a nation may be determined by how it treats its animals was Mohandas Gandhi's thought; what the U.S. racing industry says about our moral worth is appalling.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree