
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - A D.C. Council committee on Thursday stripped Mayor Adrian Fenty’s 2009 budget of nearly $900,000 slated for the city’s new closed-circuit camera program, an initiative the panel said was started prematurely.
The five-member public safety and judiciary committee, chaired by Councilman Phil Mendelson, also erased an increase of a fee levied on phone lines and directed Fenty to reduce recently raised ambulance fees. The recommendations will be taken up by the full council May 13.
The panel, without deliberation, eliminated $886,000 from the D.C. homeland security budget for the consolidation of about 5,200 closed-circuit television cameras into a single network. Fenty’s Video Interoperability for Public Safety program, which has raised alarms among privacy activists, was launched this week.
“There has been no thought on what, if any, restrictions will govern the expanded system,” Mendelson’s committee wrote in its report. “The executive should fully develop the program before it seeks funding.”
The cut in local funds, if left in place by the full council, could leave the program in limbo. Supporters say the initiative will greatly improve the city’s ability to fight crime and monitor potentially dangerous situations.
“The budget my administration submitted to council funded essential front-line public safety positions and programs so that we can better protect our citizens,” Fenty said in a statement. “I will work with the council to ensure that these critical programs remain intact.”
Also from the budget markup, the council for the fifth straight year appears poised to kill a proposed increase to the E-911 fee, a monthly tax on every D.C. phone line. The mayor’s suggested increase, from 76 cents to 99 cents, was expected to raise $3.8 million, much of which was slated for mobile data computers and GPS devices for emergency vehicles.
The committee shifted $1.7 million from salary vacancies to make up for roughly half the loss.
The panel further agreed that Fenty should lower recently raised fees for ambulance rides. The increases, double the old fees, were implemented March 21 and are expected to generate $7.2 million. Reducing the charges, which the committee deemed “unjustifiably high,” will allow the city to recover its costs “but in a less painful way,” Ward 3 Councilwoman Mary Cheh said.
mneibauer@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:42 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Councilman stalls streetcar plans in Anacostia"
Report as inappropriate
11:31 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 12, 2008
re: "Big name donors support GOP D.C. Council candidate"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008
re: "Council weighs taxing free employee parking"
Report as inappropriate
11:11 AM MST on Sun., Mar. 16, 2008
re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"
Report as inappropriate
1:36 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
12:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 6, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
5:44 PM MST on Tue., Mar. 4, 2008
re: "Coucilwoman calls for buyout decrease and bonus for staffers who stay"
Report as inappropriate
1:19 PM MST on Mon., Oct. 15, 2007
re: "Council to carve up big pot of money"
Report as inappropriate
will streetcars help or harm? said:
Don't we need to know about the streets the streetcars will be in? Streetcars work in places like Portland, OR, when they have a dedicated area in the middle of a street so that they don't block traffic. But if they have to use the street, they will likely increase congestion, not reduce it. This should be the start of the questioning -- not just ridership, but what happens to traffic speeds. If Graham discovers that there are issues with this streetcar, he should look at the other streetcar plans as well.
4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
What said:
Where is Carol doing her job from Rohoboth? She is not only losing Republican support, she is also losing all support.
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Oh, well. Nobody will come to DC anymore. Especially since Graham parks his own car for free. "Do as I say, not as I do."
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Homnoir: said:
Oh well, The Cary Silveman campaign may be seeing it's due demise. Silverman & all 10 of his constituents -Ray(We're-Here-We're....) Milefsky, Martin Moulton, Richard (Act-Up) Rogers, Si (I-demand-Shotspotter-now)Kailian, Alex (Bring-me-a-memo) Padro, Kevin (Uncle-Ruckus)Chappelle, Brian (I-demand-an-answer-this-minute-Councilman) Smith and their partners & significant others can take the message that the Shaw/Mt. Vernon/Convention Center/Chinatown community do not find their message(s) are the most viable for the aformentioned communities, as a whole. It's call inclusiveness not colonization by way of gay economic elitism.
6 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
In any large business, there are incompetent workers. However, there are still many competent workers in D.C. government & a "brain drain" is possible! Most of the problems & perception of bad service are due to ill-prepared managers; managers that should never have been placed in such positions & certainly not allowed to continue as managers. D.C., unfortunately, has an ineffective, inefficient, inadequate method of selecting, training, maintaining & validating its office/program managers. In most instances, required supervisory (MSS)training is a joke and focuses mostly on fluff. A crew is only as good as its captain. If the captain is ethically challenged, unable or unwilling to perform, unfair, and/or a bully to subordinates-the public should expect poor performance and/or service. Yet, even under such challenges, many D.C. workers try to do their work. Their cries for help are routinely ignored & they have become easy whipping posts for what ails DC. Request my name be anonymous.
11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Could you do a follow-up to determine how, and when, employees will be notified as to whether they have been guaranteed to receive the incentive payment. Employees would like to put in their official papers if they knew they would definitely receive the incentive. For instance, does it matter when one actually leaves the rolls? How much notice will employees receive that they have been found eligible? The applicaiton to retire, open through Friday, March 7, 2008, is an intent to retire and allows an employee to withdraw their intent. As a matter of fact, could you see whether or not the city is going to have a special fund during FY 2009 to pay these incentives? If Gandhi is saying there is a fiscal problem looming, how does that fit in? Also, will employees receive a lump sum incentive payment or payouts throughout 2009? Will those identified for the incentive payment be based on actual quality of services provided based on the last evaluation? Request my name be anonymous.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Councilwoman Carol Schwartz is in error. There would be no "brain drain" from the ranks of the D.C. Government because of the fact that the majority of the D.C. employees have little or no brains to begin with. Frankly, if they want to do the taxpayers a favor what they should do is fire what they have and recruit from the outside. Then their problems would be solved.
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
What about the taxpayers? said:
Those of use who pay through the nose in property taxes should get a little relief. How about a partial refund?
112 agree | 109 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree