In regard to Ken Garcia’s column (The Examiner, April 29) about taxpayers saying no to more expenditures, I couldn’t agree more. It seems like San Francisco is a city that expects its residents to have endless cash reserves, when The City itself does not. All this while The City pays employees, such as the head of Muni, ridiculous sums of money, while that agency underperforms year after year.

But one place where I must distance myself from Mr. Garcia is about fines for trash and recycling containers being left out. While he seems to feel it’s unjust, I feel this is a quality-of-life issue. San Francisco is above all things beautiful and that’s why I’m willing to pay ridiculous amounts of money to live modestly here.

Trash and recycling containers being left out in sight are a blight on our beautiful city. Maybe Mr. Garcia is able to afford to live in an expensive neighborhood where his neighbors have enough common sense to put away their ugly, filthy, smelly refuse containers, but many of us do not.

Where I live, in the Sunset district, refuse containers being left out is a huge problem, and it takes away from our neighborhood’s cleanliness, property values and community pride. The people who are receiving these fines are not poor victims. They are thumbing their nose at a law for which they’ve received warnings before being fined. Furthermore, the media has blitzed about the law requiring refuse containers to be put away for nearly two years now.

I just hope The City does these same sweeps for violators in the Sunset district.

Daniel Saint James

San Francisco

Ken Garcia’s April 29 column “Taxpayers: Just say no to more expenditures” is advice that should be heeded by every San Francisco voter.

In spite of a $6 billion annual budget (a budget bigger then that of 20 states), San Francisco can’t keep its streets clean, maintain its parks, fix its potholes or run Muni on time, and then keeps coming back to the taxpayers asking for more.

Perhaps if we didn’t have supervisors who would rather spend the taxpayers dime to add positions on the city payroll to facilitate illegal immigration and other ideological pet causes, The City could easily maintain high-quality basic services with the revenue they have.

The cause of the problem therefore points to the solution. The voters in November need to elect supervisors who are pragmatic problem solvers rather then ideological problem creators.

E.F. Sullivan

San Francisco

Ken Garcia amazingly seems to believe that local government’s purpose is little more than for parks, recreation, libraries and clean streets.

No wonder he is so disappointed! He conveniently forgot the far more expensive and more important services such as Muni, police, fire, planning, health and human services, S.F. General Hospital (which services people without money for health care) and Hetch Hetchy, just to name a few.

Why do I suspect the “pet projects” Mr. Garcia resents most are services for people who can’t afford them?

David Tornheim

San Francisco

Congestion pricing is absurd

While congestion charging may work in London, I do not think it could in San Francisco. Let me explain why.

In Britain, by law, all vehicles must display licence plates on front and rear. Any vehicle without one will be stopped by the police.

The plate details are captured by cameras as vehicles enter the charging area. Then the photo of the plate is checked through the Driving and Vehicle Licencing Centre (similar to California’s DMV).

The registered keeper is then sent an invoice to pay.

This has led to an increase of theft of licence plates, in some places as far as 500 miles away from London. The stolen plates are then put onto other vehicles and used to defeat the charge.

Now let’s look at San Francisco.

How many vehicles have you seen on city streets without front or rear plates? In a normal day, I see 50-plus. It seems strange that the CHP and SFPD ignore these vehicles, when they could be stolen and used in robberies.

Mervyn Williams

Daly City

Learn from NYC’s mistake

In “Congestion pricing” (Letters, April 15), Sprague Terplan endorses its application to discourage driving and encourage transit usage, biking and walking.

Too bad he didn’t serve in the N.Y. state Assembly on April 7. Reluctant to allow congestion pricing in one of the nation’s most congested cities, the Legislature rejected a $354 million federal grant that may now go in part to Los Angeles to purchase and operate new express buses on converted diamond lanes.

Let’s hope that San Francisco and the state Legislature don’t repeat New York City’s mistake here.

Irvin Dawid

Palo Alto

To add your voice

The Examiner gives preference to letters containing fewer than 150 words. Please include name, phone number and city of residence.

By e-mail: letters@examiner.com

By mail:

Editorial Page Editor

The Examiner, 450 Mission St.

San Francisco, CA 94105

By Fax: (415) 359-2766

Comments from Examiner Readers

2:56 PM MST on Fri., May. 16, 2008 re: "Counterproductive divisiveness"

RichmondMan said:
Development of Hunter's Point is not progressing, and will not progress with the current state of no leadership in San Francisco. I worked at Hunter's Point from 1975 through 1985, when the Navy began evictions to start the cleanup and redevelopment. In 23 years, NOTHING has been done. This makes the fiasco of the Fell Street off-ramp look good. In that case, we spent millions on studies and ballot initiatives to appease a vocal minority that didn't ant a freeway crossing Market St. Now these same folks bitch about pedestrians getting hit by cars entering or exiting the freeway. If Chris Daly and other "progressives" are successful, there will never be development at Hunter's Point - at least not the type supported by African Americans who want access to Hunters Point and are currently denied access, and are represented by Sophie Maxwell. The artists who currently occupy Hunter's Point are white progressives - Chris Daly's support group. That is the only reason behind Pro

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:01 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"

Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Milvy seems to forget there are children with dogs who want to enjoy the parks, too. When I was a kid, the ONLY time I wanted to go to the park was to play with my dog. I sure would have resented being given the message that if a kid prefers a dog and a Frisbee to a ball and a bat, they deserve to be marginalized and treated like outsiders. THAT is "selfish" and short-sighted. Try talking to the kids with dogs in Cole Valley about how they felt when they were locked out of their own park 10 years ago (Grattan) and robbed of a cherished meeting place for them and their pets as well as other community members.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:49 PM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"

Examiner Reader said:
Wel then since you don't license children there are none in the city. I have seen MANY CHILDREN/PARENTS URINATING in public parks even though there are bathrooms available. Oh and don't get me started on the garbage the families leave behind at parks expecting others to clean up after them.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

10:18 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"

Examiner Reader said:
Actually their are only 12,000 licensed dogs in San Francisco, which is the only way that dogs should be counted.

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:40 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Dogs off the leash in city parks"

Chuck said:
Ms. Milvy is absolutely RIGHT. Dogs should NEVER be allowed off leash in a non-dog park. Dog owners that don't obey the rules should be cited for public nuisance. People are far more important than a dog.

3 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

10:18 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Nader omission is dirty politics"

Examiner Reader said:
Nader candidacy is dirty politics!

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

9:24 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"

Examiner Reader said:
The case of Muni fare inspectors is a perfect example of local leaders� inability to think in a businesslike manner.
"in a businesslike manner" is a bit redundant here...

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

5:56 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008 re: "Wildlife rescue center needed"

Carl said:
Re: Wildlife in Agony at Fisherman's Wharf Pier-- "The sea lion�s neck was sliced, and he was in agony through the night because we do not have a wildlife rescue center here within San Francisco city limits." What about Animal Care and Control? San Francisco has ER VETS all around us not to mention all the animal hospitals all up and down the penninsula. San Francisco has way to much buracracy and not enough compasion. Has San Francisco got an answer to care for dying animlas now? Call 311? OMG... my gut hurts!What a sorry city. To bad the sea lion was not in agony elsewhere where he would have gotten the right care. He will know better next time.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:14 AM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Smoking and tobacco-sales bans"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank god San Francisco still has complete wacko's like George Davis.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:47 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"

Examiner Reader said:
Friday night at Civic Center, I boarded the second car of an outbound J-CHURCH with other passengers seated. At Van Ness the driver announced there was "no service" on the second car and we needed to move to the first car. Most passengers looked at each other like what is the driver talking about and onward the train went. After emerging from the tunnel, the driver stopped the train, came back and announced there is "no service" on this train and we must all move to the first car. Can someone tell me when the second car is lit, the doors are working, passengers have been on the train since embaracdeo, what "no service" status is?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:28 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"

Examiner Reader said:
One must remember that the presence of law enforcement (police, Muni inspectors) affects behavior too. I'm sure that if there were no fare inspectors, there would be much more than $36,000 of fare evasion. While it's anyone's guess how many people paid their fare to avoid a ticket from the inspectors, I'm sure their work amounts to more than the $36,000 quoted.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:19 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008 re: "Vouchers aren�t education solution"

Examiner Reader said:
Aother "let's blame the teachers" editorial. Blame the parents who don't care, who don't parent, or are absent. Blame the school boards, who are providing the executive direction. My wife is a public High school teacher(15 years). She received a $375 increase from 2006 to 2007. Most teachers pay is nearly frozen from the periods between 10-15 years of service. In 2008 she gets a ONE TIME 3% bonus, but no permanent increase. There is no heat in her class room during the winter. Without fail, every class has 35 students for one teacher. Yet at her school they are building a brand new football stadium, new baseball field and press box. The rule is - where things are wrong, follow the money. If the teachers are screwing up public education, where's their cut of the money?

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:54 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"

Examiner Reader said:
on Sunday I was getting on the F train at 5 and Market. The driver ordered passengers to go in the back door. He could not have cared less if people paid or not. I got on for free. Until the idiots at MUNI do something about discipline amongst the drivers nothing is gonna get better. Get rid of the UNION once and for all or privatize. Get some compentent management instead of Newsom political hacks

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:45 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Fare dodging and Muni inspectors"

Examiner Reader said:
MUNI'S service remains a comedy act, unfortunately, its neither efficient or funny.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:37 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Silence is betrayal � impeach Bush"

Examiner Reader said:
As a Democrat, I'm sorry to say this. Unlike the Republicans, it appears the Democrats are loathe to alienate *ANY* possible voters in the upcoming election, so impeachment of Bush/Cheney remains unlikely. Considering everthing that has happened in the last 4 years, the Democrats should be walking away with the presidency and we are not. In Barack and Hillary we have candidates which are while capable, arguably unelectable, and the default vote for many Americans, I'm afraid, is likely McCain.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:24 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008 re: "Mental illness and murder"

Examiner Reader said:
Yes on 98, No on 99.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

8:17 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "A historic neighborhood theater"

examiner reader said:
ef sullivan hit the nail on the head. voters, pay attention!

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

9:32 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Working women are just catching up"

Examiner Reader said:
Women don't "catch up" on 4/22 unless men have not worked since the beginning of the year. Actually, that may be a good idea. Men don't work for a few months every year to allow women to catch up.

6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:42 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Working women are just catching up"

Examiner Reader said:
If women earn approximately 77 cents for every dollar a man is paid and "catch up day" is on 4/22, then it takes about 15.7 months for women to earn what men earn in 12 months, not 14 months as stated in the the letter to today's Examiner. The letter does not state that women do the same work as men.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:11 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Garcia wrong on Daly City insults"

Examiner Reader said:
Garcia is gone. Good riddance. But he was right about that neighborhood, though.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:55 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008 re: "Airline mergers pose grim future"

Examiner Reader said:
Joshua Kyle thinks his right to protest was taken away? What irony. An organized attempt to disrupt another organized activity was thwarted by an organized attempt to disrupt the organized disruption.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

11:31 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Landlords leaving the business"

Examiner Reader said:
Ok, let's be realistic, I pay $2776.00 for my 2 bdrm., Noe Valley flat with an additional 120.00 for an uncovered, parking space. My move-in check to my landlord was $5500.00. The large studio next door is currently on rental market for 1650.00. My closest friend pays $1460.00 for an average studio 2 blocks away. Unless you live in NYC or SF, these can be argued as outrageous sums for rent. Who are these tenants who only want cheap rents?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

6:06 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "City torches run for protesters"

Examiner Reader said:
FYI Examiner orange and yellow are horrible colors for a website.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:26 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 14, 2008 re: "City torches run for protesters"

Examiner Reader said:
I love the irony. The "civil disobediants" are quite upset that their best laid plans went awry at the hands of (Newsom), when what they wanted to do was upset what they thought were(Newsoms') best laid plans. When all else fails, they whine about loss of rights. No rights were violated - you're just embarrassed.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:39 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 13, 2008 re: "Torch sparked more than protests"

Examiner Reader said:
Imagine that, as Dr. Martin Luther King marched on Selma in non-violent civil dis-obedience, the authorities were able to move Selma two miles away and, hours later, put Selma onto a plane bound for Argentina. The Civil Rights Act might never have been passed. The News-ticker that day would have read: Selma march route changed: Mayor sites public safety concerns. On April 9th 2008 at the Olympic Torch relay in San Francesco, Selma was moved for me and my wife, who is a Tibetan-American and that threatens all our civil rights. The right to protest includes the right to protest in reasonable proximity to the target of the protest, normally within sight and sound. So, for example if I wanted to protest city hall, a permit to protest two miles away would violate my rights. By moving the route of the Olympic torch and the closing ceremonies miles from the publicly published route, the right to protest was denied to my wife and I and all those others who attended.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:15 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008 re: "Torch sparked more than protests"

Examiner Reader said:
Remember: It was British who killed thousands tibetans back in 1904. Independent of Tibet? If China blocks the pathway of Tibet, that equal to a death to Tibet. Just take a look at the map, Dalai lama knows well about this.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

4:28 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Let the Olympic torch proceed in S.F."

The Olypic Torch Relay said:
I feel that since the running of the torch was started by Hitler in an attempt to glorify the Third Reich, the relay of the torch should be abolished. I'm always surprised every time that tradition takes place. I have nothing against the torch, or the Olympics. But I think the tradition of the flame being moved should be stopped. I don't quite understand why the world has let Hitler's legacy continue. It started as propaganda, and it seems like the whole world is too lost in tradition to let it go.

10 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Theater loss due to public policy"

Examiner Reader said:
Resubmit it and be gerneral on all illegals and not single out a ethnic group might help. "Hmmm wonder why my comment about illegals was removed. Truth hurt SF?"

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008 re: "Giants should bring back Bonds"

Conscientious Observer said:
Why bring back BONDS ? The Giants should donate the money they would use to a local charity or use it to buy asphalt to fill some of the thousands of potholes around town ... the biggest being the hole SF City Hall & Gavin Newsom et al are in.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:24 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008 re: "Giants should bring back Bonds"

Examiner Reader said:
People who own rentals should be able to charge whatever they want! It is thier business. Renters create their own means to generate money or they don't, but they cannot expect to to ride roughshod over owners and government has no right to curb owners investments!

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:38 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008 re: "Luring businesses to S.F. doomed"

Examiner Reader said:
I hope the City gets what they want. Ten Million illegal aliens all arriving at SF General, all at once, to line up for their free health care. Sweet.

5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:34 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008 re: "Use lights to protect pedestrians"

Richmond Resident said:
I cross 30th and Lincoln every week. Most of the drivers are going at least 50MPH as they cruise through talking on their cell phones. PLEASE put a light there - NOW!!!

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:47 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008 re: "Let the Olympic torch proceed in S.F."

Conscientious Observer said:
Note: 90% of the TIBET "protestors" who are California K-12 educated can NOT find TIBET on the world map. The 10% who can, probably should spend their time more wisely and protest the human rights violations in Oakland, Pinole (Highway 80), Richmond, San Francisco and East Palo Alto with a higher daily body count then Basra, Iraq or Tibet.

8 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:56 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Use lights to protect pedestrians"

Examiner Reader said:
Re "Use lights to protect pedestrians": I agree. Lights were installed on Fulton at 18th and 22nd Aves, and they have made a huge difference. Fulton traffic (crazy driving) seems barely impeded -- it is still dangerous to try to cross Fulton in the short stretch between the two light-controlled intersections -- but it's great to be able to walk to one of the lights, push the button, wait a bit, and cross safely. Plus, there seems to be far, far fewer car crashes in this whole stretch, now that the lights have created brief cross-traffic lulls for drivers who are trying to turn onto Fulton.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:40 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Multitasking for litter cleanup needed"

Examiner Reader said:
That was what he was saying, her peas (books) were not in the pod (book bag) in 1967 - her purse was maybe thrown, but reviewing my yearbooks and pictures of the 1950s and 1960s don't show book bags, but students carrying books and binders. After all, he did say it was petty; it was his observation. I googled into this phenomena and discovered that back packs; abet book bags were presenting a problem in the 1980's and currently creating medical conditions in students. Military and civilians bags were more common in the 1780 though.... This is not an Obama stunt; he is probably a die hard Repubican in an enriched Democtatic community that invites illegal immigrants to to move to SF and partake on their freebie entitlements! The mayor has an "overworked noggin" about that phenomena.

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

11:51 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Multitasking for litter cleanup needed"

Jack Kirkpatrick said:
BOOK BAG? Hillary says that see "threw her book bag" across the room after Martin Luther King, Jr. assassination in 1967. WAIT: book bags were rare if ever commonly used on college campuses. Book bags didn't become popular until the 1980s...! Is she embellishing the truth again? Maybe she did hurl her books across the room, but not a book bag; maybe a pillow? Petty, yes, but again it doesn't have the ring of truth. I was a college student while she was a junior. Lets look at some of the historical pictures of Wellesley College students during the period. What do other students of the time think?

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:40 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Find high-tech workers in U.S."

Examiner Reader said:
Ed Young - you got it right! OK in San Francisco: Free Health Care and Sanctuary for persons who have broken the law by entering our country illegally. Deny rights to property owners who are citizens, prevent freedom of speech to those who we disagree with (JROTC, Boy Scouts). Deny economic development to minorities by preventing investment (Home Depot). Deny adequate Police Protection by assigning them to desks instead of assigning them to the streets, yet tie the hands of Police by preventing them from assisting other criminal justice agencies in law-enforcement actions. Bottom line: anything is OK in San Francisco, UNLESS it is not Progressively Correct.

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

7:28 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Supes nix opportunity for Bayview"

Examiner Reader said:
Actually its another opportunity for the Bayview Community "shot down" by the progressives on the Board of Supervisors. They rather see liquor stores in the Bayview District instead of Home Depot.

7 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

3:51 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Supes nix opportunity for Bayview"

Examiner Reader said:
To the writer who wrote: "Another opportunity for the black community shot down by Tom Ammiano. . . ." In all fairness it was his political soul mates on the School Board who shot down JROTC at the expense of all San Francisco Children. I agree with you, JROTC would be an excellent alternative for at-risk-youth. While do not share the same political view as Mssrs. Ammiano and Daly et al, I believe they have the right to express their viewpoints just so long as their actions as legislators do not harm the citizenry.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:11 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "SFPD uses taxpayers as ATMs"

Examiner Reader said:
Mr Singh is incorrect. Mr Obama threw Rev Wright under the bus for telling the nasty truth that FOX news and its "conservative, white" auditence doesn't have the stomach to hear. America's early economic success was built literally on the backs of slaves. Slaves were denied repirations wen slavery ended (actually it was replaced by endentured servitude in the form of share-cropping). Blacks were systematically discriminated against in voting, lending, jobs, schools; they were murdered if they spoke out - and this is all in my lifetime. I wouold vote for Rev Wright over Mr Obama. At least he speaks the truth.

3 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

2:02 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Supes nix opportunity for Bayview"

Examiner Reader said:
Another opportunity for the black community shot down by Tom Ammiano. Tom supports free health care for illegal aliens, opposes jobs for blacks. Tom ran the scouts out of city properties, leaving no alternative opportunities for young kids to experience the outdoors. I suppose THOUSANDS gays were denied jobs by the scounts. I don't necessarily agree with scouting's position on Gay leaders, but to deny countless children the opportunity for an alternative to killing shows the blatent disregard for children, particularly minority children, rampant in the gay community. A similar situation exists with ROTC. Deny mostly minority children the opportunity to even hear another viewpoint. Throw the kids under the bus to placate the gays.

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

1:54 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008 re: "Supes nix opportunity for Bayview"

Examiner Reader said:
EF Sullivan for Mayor! 100% pragmatic!

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

Report as inappropriate

12:57 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008 re: "Let the Olympic torch proceed in S.F."

ms jackson said:
Gary Eplet would not know