
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History San Mateo County (Map, News) - Accused wife-killer Quincy Norton took the stand at his murder trial Wednesday, describing a tumultuous relationship with frequent separations and infidelities but flatly denying any violence.
The 33-year-old is charged with first-degree murder in the July 22, 2006, stabbing death of Tamika Mack Norton, 31. Prosecutors have told jurors that Norton was a batterer who killed his wife after she filed for divorce.
Norton, who will continue his testimony and face cross-examination today, said his relationship with wife Tamika Mack Norton became rocky shortly after it began in 1996.
During the decade-long relationship, Norton moved in and out of the home 15 to 20 times, he said. It was during one of these separations in 1999 that Norton became romantically involved with childhood friend Anitra Johnson, he testified.
Though he reconciled with Mack Norton, his romance with Johnson continued, he said. Norton had three children with his wife and a daughter with Johnson.
His drinking, and both his and Mack Norton’s alleged infidelities, were a frequent source of friction, he said.
Three years before Mack Norton’s death, Norton was arrested for domestic violence after allegedly beating Mack Norton and threatening to cut off her hair. Those charges were later dropped after prosecutors said Mack Norton and Johnson concocted a story that a fight between the two women produced the injuries.
On Wednesday, Norton testified that he witnessed the fight and that Mack Norton had him falsely arrested to prevent her family from finding out about his affair.
“I never touched Tamika. I never slapped her, scratched her, punched her. I never did anything like that,” Norton said. “If she got in my face, I laughed at her and left the house.”
Johnson, who told San Mateo Superior Court Judge Craig Parsons on Tuesday that she would testify for the defense, changed her mind Wednesday morning and invoked her Fifth Amendment right.
Outside of court, Johnson said she reconsidered the advice of her lawyer and feared being prosecuted again in the case.
Johnson was originally charged with aiding and abetting Norton during his month on the lam following the killing, but those charges were later dropped.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
10:32 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
12:10 PM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
11:37 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
1:51 PM MST on Mon., May. 19, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
3:59 PM MST on Sun., May. 18, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
3:02 AM MST on Sun., May. 18, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 PM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
3:23 PM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
12:35 AM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008
re: "Norton guilty of murdering wife"
Report as inappropriate
9:09 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Slaying suspect's motion to fire attorney denied"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
4:00 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
2:22 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
3:45 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
3:17 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
8:53 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 2, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
4:30 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 1, 2008
re: "DNA evidence in stabbing could get husband off hook"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
New Lawyer means New Trial
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
i thought attorney Foxx was respectful to the family. i saw her in the halls and she seemed nice.
11 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The old Foxx needs to explain; Quincey this means misery,misery,misery. He is about to meet a new cast of whatevers. All he has is time
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Courtroom Observer said:
Patricia Foxx is a joke, but not funny. There was a Judge,twelve jurors,two alternate jurors,crime scene investigators, DNA experts, Domestic Violence Experts,Expert Child Psychologists,four sheriffs, newspaper reporters, family and friends as well as interested unknowns in the courtroom EVERYDAY and the only person believing Quincy could be innocent was Patricia Foxx. The old Foxx tried her hardest to cause a mistrial, picking and lying on the family of Tamika which was not only insulting but disrespectful. That old Foxx even went so far as to try to force Tamikas 92yr old great grandmother to speak to her. What a pity, what a pity, what a pity. All Quincy has now is TIME.
7 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
To answer the "Examiner Readers" question with respect to the DNA and if "someone else could have put it there". Sure someone else could have. It's called "transference of DNA". The murderer could have transferred it or more probable than this, how about the girlfriend herself depositing it there when she snuck into another woman's home when the other woman was at work?? While the wife worked to support her family, the girlfriend snuck around with her boyfriend, the wife's husband, and the father of the wife's (and the murderer's) children. SHAME ON YOU. Anyway, who cares about the DNA.....it was'nt on the knife that killed Tamika anyway. Just food for thought, I guess or maybe just a smoke screen??
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
My advice to the murderer would be to stop all of his vile lies, NOW. You don't have to listen to me, you'll have plenty of time to reflect on what you have done. What he has done can never be resended. He should now TRY to get it right,first with our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ (and I know, first hand that Quincy knows "HIM", although not personally),and secondly with his children. For these are the 3 people that he(Quincy)has truly robbed the most. He has robbed them of their precious mother. And anyone who knew Tamika knows that she was a wonderful mother. Her children came first, then her family. But she also revered God, and to those that don't know, she loved her husband and tried so hard to make her marriage work and keep her family together. But this was not to be, and was next to impossible given the MANY challenges and obstacles that she faced. Rest in Peace Sweet Tamika, you did your best, but GOD had another plan for you. Your race was run and won here on ear
7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
DNA was not the issue at all,the weapon with the DNA of his sick girlfriend was not the murder weapon. Had you taken the time to attend the trial you could have learned alot about DNA. Quincy Norton needs prayers, and it would be only the grace and mercy of God if they mean anything. He has killed Tamika and caused lots of emotional trama to her family. He will be locked up like an animal for the rest of his life, never to see or be able to beg for forgiveness of their beautiful family. Twenty-six years is a long time to suffer. Quincy will one day realize this is not a nightmare, and he is hated by so many people that he might wish he were dead...What a horrible life when even death ignores him. Prayers for the beautiful Mack family
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sounds like all forensics was sloppy - but DNA could've been there weeks or days ago.
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What about the dna on the knife? Can someone else put it there?
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What is done in the dark has a very distinctive way of coming to the light. Ummmm..........
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
is this normal? she got the other person's dna?
16 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How did the DNA get there? Why is it so late? What else is not given to the attorney for Quincy? Is this fair? Too many questions.
26 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Is it too late to charge the mistress even though the chagres against her were dropped? This would make a good book.
10 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Lawyers now gagged. What is the court hiding?
105 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It IS pretty startling that the Da would withhold important evidnece like this. It could help the defendant get out of jail. Is this how it works for black men in Cal? This is a shame.
119 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
no charges now.. but soon is this out of a chicago news paper??
3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
and the plot thickens
9 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Qunicy you and yours are in my parayers.
60 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
what's going on here? why wasn't this done sooner? this stinks.
46 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree