Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 9 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 9 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 9 mins ago
Examiner.com // 29 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 38 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 43 mins ago
Examiner.com // 1 hr 37 mins ago
Quick Read | ABC7.com // 1 hr 54 mins ago
Quick Read | Daily News // 1 hr 57 mins ago
Quick Read | Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 29 mins ago
 
   
San Carlos police escape staff reductions ­— for now
Article History
There are updates to this article.
The San Carlos Police Department has lost five staff members since 2005.
(Examiner file photo)
The San Carlos Police Department has lost five staff members since 2005.

SAN CARLOS (Map, News) - The Police Department appears to have survived sweeping cuts to city programs and services, but officers may very well be yanked from the force in coming years, city officials said.

On Tuesday, the City Council opted to spare five police positions worth more than $800,000 as it grapples with a $2.7 million deficit. Positions for three police officers, a detective and commander faced the chopping block, city officials said.

A slumping economy with no apparent end prompted the city’s call for 15 percent cuts to all departments. The police department caught a break because it had endured cuts over the last several years and it was time to refocus reduction measures on parks and recreation, city officials said.

“Police, fire and parks and recreation account for 69 percent of the general fund budget,” said Brian Moura, assistant city manager. “If you don’t cut police, you have to go to parks and recreation.”

Police Chief Greg Rothaus says his department has lost five staff members since 2005. Moura said in the last two years, police funding has been reduced by 7 percent.

“The City Council really wanted to protect public safety in this budget, and that was evident in the decisions they made,” Rothaus said. “Right now, cuts to any departments, including police, are extremely impactful.”

Rothaus will retain personnel next year but said that, “without additional revenue, everything will be [up for cuts again], including police.”

This is the fifth year in a row the city has had to make significant reductions. The city is projecting another five years of cuts, Moura said.

On Tuesday, City Manager Mark Weiss recommended slashing more than 30 various expenses — mainly within the parks and recreation and administrative realms. Only two were spared: the Special Needs and Healthy Cities Tutoring programs.

“It’s definitely reaffirming to have that vote of confidence for the program and to see it continue next year,” said Donna Becht, Healthy Cities program coordinator. “It was very exciting to have so many people speaking on our behalf.”

Becht, however, acknowledges the program — which consists of 200 children and nearly 200 tutors — will likely face the ax again the next time cuts are proposed. She said she was working on fetching more private donations and grants so the program would become more sustainable.

maldax@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:32 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 12, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

Captital Offense said:
Will MTA being monitored by "terrorist-trained homeland security specialists" "concentrating on our most vulnerable areas,” make fare evasion a capital offense? Will sleeping in Muni now be a federal crime?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

11:45 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "San Carlos police escape staff reductions ­— for now"

Examiner Reader said:
It is true that San Carlos lost 5 officers, and refuses to let people know the truth why they were fired. Research the 8 million dollar lawsuit San Carlos had to pay out! Also how was it possible that one of the officers that were caught in the middle of the lies and cover up exempt from prosecution and was able to take a new job as chief of Benicia police dept? Obstruction of justice = NEW JOB AS CHIEF OF POLICE IN ANOTHER CITY? JUST WHAT DID SHE HAVE TO DO TO PULL THAT OFF ???

42 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:19 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 11, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

L. Amiot said:
I hope that you are not a sworn policeman, Mr. maninblue. The real men in blue are intelligent and erudite. They know how to spell and punctuate a sentence. They also know the difference between vane and vain.

1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:14 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 10, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

maninblue said:
I hope mr. L amiot, you are not using his name in vane. The real layne amiot was a true gentleman and a class sgt in the police department.. i hope its just a coincidence

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Vulnerable agencies lose sworn officers due to city’s deficit"

L. Amiot said:
There goes young Newsom meddling with the Police Dept again. Now we are losing 2 well trained, educated, and experienced, veteran law enforcement leaders from PUC and MTA because young Newsom thinks it's best....for his image. Public Safety is at risk with this interference and micromanaging. This goes well with his idea of planting broccoli and carrots in Civic Center Plaza. If he wants the books to reflect a smaller payroll, he should dump some of the advisors he’s brought onboard since his surprising reelection. This young silverspoon Marinite has made a mockery of our city with his immaturity and narcissism. Now he wants to be our Governor?

5 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:26 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 14, 2008 re: "San Carlos police escape staff reductions ­— for now"

Examiner Reader said:
San Carlos Police ..... USELESS IDIOTS !

98 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:48 AM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Baltimore City's top police lawyer joins O’Malley administration under fire"

Examiner Reader said:
What logic! With Hornig at the helm Baltimore City loses as many jury trials a year as they used to have altogether. Only in government would an official point to that as victory.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:22 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Joint meeting would address club hubbub"

Examiner Reader said:
I don't know anyone who moved to North Beach because they thought it was going to be a quiet neigbhorhood?

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:29 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 28, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree that there is an issue (City drivers are horrible, generally some of the most inept I've seen), but the sting operation isn't the best way to go about this. Observe that a scooter got hit, and regardless of the motive, I sure would've been livid had that been me. Further, I ride a motorcycle (and live in the area) - I do not stop for pedestrians unless they are actually in the road (this may infuriate people or not technically meet the law; I intend to check now whether you must stop for people not actually already crossing) because I know I'm a sitting duck at that point, and I observe by the minute just how attentive SF drivers are. Footnote - don't believe for a second that hands-free phones make one whit of difference.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:17 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
24/7 vehicles speed down this stretch of Lincoln Way between 25th Ave and Sunset because there are no stop signs. It's even worst at night. If you live nearby you hear every kind of vehicle tearing down the road, that includes busses going way over the speed limit. Residents asked for a stop sign at 30th. City in its wisdom okayed a stop light which it won't install because it is too expensive. How much would a couple of stop signs (not lights) cost to install? Someone should sue the City for its failure to protect its citizens. Thanks for running the sting but how about doing it occasionally at night when it is even worse!

4 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:57 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
Bicyclists aren't much better. Less than a week ago in the Outer Sunset, a bicyclist blew through a 4-way stop intersection and nearly plowed into me and my two sons in a crosswalk. As she whizzed by, she had the nerve to say "look both ways before crossing the street, jerk."

6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:55 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you San Francisco Police Department. Keep up the pedestrian stings. SF is a wonderful city to walk around were it not for the bad drivers. Granted from time to time a pedestrian pulls a stupid move, but they are not the ones throwing the big machines around. Thank you also SF Examiner for carrying this story. The Examiner is always reports on pedestrian issues and I am grateful. Robert Kolbe

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Thu., Mar. 27, 2008 re: "Police target drivers at dangerous intersection"

Examiner Reader said:
No surprise here, cyclist, pedestrians there all in the way. It is all fair game to the gass holes. 17 tickets in 90 minutes. I bet the the person in the pick-up truck was on the cell phone while blowing past the cross walk. Now lets see how many of those tickets actually generate the $250.00 fines. Take back the streets from the gass holes!!!

15 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)