
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - As Barack Obama heads for Indiana, political analysts said Tuesday he should build on his denunciation of the Rev. Jeremiah Wright to improve relations with the white working-class voters who were offended by the inflammatory comments of his former pastor.
“He’s got no choice but to go to Indiana and explain it as many times as he has to,” said Hank Sheinkopf, adviser to President Clinton’s 1996 campaign.
Poll numbers show that Wright’s appearance at the National Press Club on Monday, when he accused the U.S. government of provoking terrorist attacks and giving blacks the virus that causes AIDS, came at a particularly bad time for Obama.
On the heels of his loss in Pennsylvania, he lost his slight lead in Indiana, according to an average on the RealClearPolitics Web site, and he is on the verge of losing his double-digit advantage in North Carolina.
Most analysts agree that Obama should try to refocus his campaign on economic issues and other matters critical to the voters of the two states, but he should do it without dodging the Wright controversy.
“What Wright has successfully done is distract the campaign and the media coverage,” said Chris Kofinis, former communications director for the presidential campaign of John Edwards. “You address it and move on, and focus on the core challenges that are facing voters. That is what they have to focus their energies on.”
Obama is scheduled to appear at a campaign rally on the campus of Indiana University on Wednesday afternoon and will make other campaign stops in the state on Thursday.
Indiana University political science professor Lawrence J. Hanks said Obama should head to rural areas like Evansville.
“Whoever is in charge of his campaign would be prudent to send him into these communities, to churches and any sort of venue that will give him an audience with white working class voters,” Hanks said.
Obama’s efforts could be overshadowed if Wright keeps speaking out and grabbing the spotlight, said American Enterprise Institute scholar Norman Ornstein.
sferrechio@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
8:07 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "McCain, Obama take a step toward the right"
Report as inappropriate
6:07 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Obama disowns critique of McCain’s military record"
Report as inappropriate
2:53 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Webb withdraws from VP consideration"
Report as inappropriate
2:25 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Obama to accept nod in football stadium"
Report as inappropriate
11:59 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Obama to accept nod in football stadium"
Report as inappropriate
6:59 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Obama to accept nod in football stadium"
Report as inappropriate
6:58 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Obama to accept nod in football stadium"
Report as inappropriate
3:35 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Webb withdraws from VP consideration"
Report as inappropriate
11:14 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Clinton blasts Obama over ‘bitter’ comments"
Report as inappropriate
6:15 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "McCain attacks Obama over NAFTA from Canada"
Report as inappropriate
11:40 AM MST on Sun., Jul. 6, 2008
re: "Obama pulls even with McCain among Catholics, poll finds"
Report as inappropriate
7:44 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008
re: "Poll: McCain bests Obama in battle of wives"
Report as inappropriate
3:13 PM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008
re: "Obama advisers say bin Laden can appeal to U.S. courts"
Report as inappropriate
11:18 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
8:13 AM MST on Sat., Jul. 5, 2008
re: "Obama creates Web site to combat ‘smear’ campaigns"
Report as inappropriate
12:20 PM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "NRA devises advertising assault against Obama"
Report as inappropriate
10:08 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Poll: McCain bests Obama in battle of wives"
Report as inappropriate
9:22 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Obama advisers say bin Laden can appeal to U.S. courts"
Report as inappropriate
6:18 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Poll: McCain bests Obama in battle of wives"
Report as inappropriate
5:23 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Obama unveils plan to boost public service"
Report as inappropriate
1:44 AM MST on Thu., Jul. 3, 2008
re: "Poll: McCain bests Obama in battle of wives"
Report as inappropriate
9:58 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008
re: "NRA devises advertising assault against Obama"
Report as inappropriate
9:54 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008
re: "Obama’s support of faith-based initiatives latest move to middle"
Report as inappropriate
4:08 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Obama disowns critique of McCain’s military record"
Report as inappropriate
1:55 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Campaign aides say Obama aiming to win key ‘red’ states"
Report as inappropriate
11:55 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
4:02 PM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008
re: "McCain attacks Obama over NAFTA from Canada"
Report as inappropriate
9:10 AM MST on Mon., Jun. 30, 2008
re: "Obama denounces pastor’s ‘rants’"
Report as inappropriate
11:07 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 29, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
1:29 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 29, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
1:33 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
12:22 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Clinton must unite Dems behind Obama"
Report as inappropriate
6:49 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
5:08 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
5:07 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
5:04 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
3:32 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
12:30 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
10:10 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Obama rocks Baltimore arena"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Clinton must unite Dems behind Obama"
Report as inappropriate
5:18 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008
re: "Obama strikes back, accuses Nader of making ‘inflammatory’ remarks"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Obama advisers say bin Laden can appeal to U.S. courts"
Report as inappropriate
11:29 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Dem leaders close ranks behind Obama"
Report as inappropriate
9:21 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008
re: "Dobson says Obama’s ‘fruitcake’ views likely to push evangelicals to McCain"
Report as inappropriate
12:07 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008
re:
Examiner Reader said:
The differences between McCain and Obama are minimal, when you consider that both believe big government can save you from yourself, and that we can save other nations from themselves as well. I will not play along with the game of lesser of two evils, as I believe that is part of what has plunged this nation into the mess we find ourselves today. Please visit bobbarr2008.com and give liberty a voice in the Presidential debates and beyond.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Its not a question if all Military personel are upstanding, ethical and able to lead a nation as Commander in Chief. But It is definatly necessary for the 1 Commander and Chief of the Military to understand the needs of our nations military men and woman, to understand not only the day to day requirements of the military but there philosophies as well.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
eddie said:
Webb couldn't be VP if he's another Al Gore,and sell-out the coup of racist,for never embracing The CIVIL RIGHTS demands,I,Eddie gave Bubba Bill,then for him to pimp his wife in public,trying to blasphemy America and the world some more like Eddie and Civil RIGHTS,for humans worldwide,going to loose,cause he chose a white girl,over CIVIL RIGHTS,for Al Gore to sell-out every blown-up to pieces landmine forced under aged never taught CIVICS citizen,and this guy who went along with everything and devoured his own son in this atrocity,called demonicracy is a 40yr sham and shame to whitey's in America and worldwide and all neo-nazi negrids slaves and sell-outs in Africa since 1968,and you all are a bunch of CRIMINALS,Eddie is Suing on for Minting [EDDIE's] money,with Bubba Jesse Jackson,Clarence Thomas,the 2 Italians with CThomas,all on the 3rd shift,at the MINT,at miminum wages,for the printing of EDDIE's money in 500,1000,10,00,20,000,50,000,dollar bills,in a 40yr.suit on America...
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I do not trust Obama who has not served his country proudly,in some form or another, or who feels 'obligated' to wear a USA pin ( having it on only in question) or to be at a Church that hates America for over 20 years. Period. Whatever policy's he promises is mute to me. I am white 30's yr young woman in the middle of America and I believe I speak for all women who feel that honor and patriotism are first and foremost to being a leader of a nation.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
GAB said:
I am praying for rain in Denver that day, if only to infust a little humility into King Barack.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
By catching Obama, MCCAIN can undermine the effectiveness of any subsequent ads the Democrat runs. By showing that he opposed welfare reform, McCain can do much to force Obama back to the left and cast doubt on his efforts to move to the middle. And by emphasizing Obama''s limited experience, he can strike at a soft spot — made softer by Hillary''s attacks in the primary. The move is right there for McCain. Now lets see how good his campaign really is.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Obama ad, which introduces him as someone who worked his way through college, fights for American jobs, and battles for healthcare also seeks to move him to the center by taking credit for welfare reform in Illinois which, the ad proclaims, reduced the rolls by 80 percent. But there''s one problem — Obama opposed the 1996 welfare reform act at the time. The Illinois law for which he takes credit was merely the local implementing law the state was required to pass, and it did, almost unanimously. Obama''s implication, that he backed "moving people from welfare to work," is just not true.
4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Of course this would happen he {Webb} ran the dirtiest campaign for senator the year he won. He demolished Senator Allen by entrapment. They sent a moron with a video, and a word no one uses to get Allen to destroy his career. Webb must have more skeltons than we need to know about. Webb is by far the worst choice for Obama.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
NorthCarolina said:
nice topic,
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
First it was denied, and now it is out in the open. NAFTA is going to destroy what is left of the USA! If we join with canada and mexico, you all know we will have a new name, right. And a new currency. Maybe that's why the dollar is falling the way it is now? To make way for the new currency--the Amero. Which by the way you can buy on-line right now. Wake Up People before it is too late to save the USA!
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
MCCAIN 2008-2012 said:
Barack Obama worshiped in an anti-Semitic, anti-Caucasian, racist church for twenty years. No CREDIBLE Christian would ever vote for this fool, period.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
MCCAIN 2008-2012. Enough said.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Perhaps you should look up Michelle Obama"s 1985 Princeton Senior Thesis,under her maiden name of Michelle La Vaughn Robinson,and see how she feels about our country.It is titled "Princeton Educated Blacks and the Black Community". She stated that "America was a nation founded on crime and hatred". Moreover that "Whites are incredibaly racist". When she looks into a crowd, she doesn't see Americans,she sees Black and White people conflicted with each other. Her thesis provides a sampling of Michelle's views through a race based prism. This is a very devisive view of a potential first lady that would do untold damage to race relations in our country in an Obama administration.
7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
RON PAUL '08!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Carmelia said:
Your poll of those who dislike Michelle Obama is the most ridiculous effort to find something negative on a candidate who is the most admirable person running for the presidential office this century. Instead of being proud and encouraging to Americans with talent who can help lead this country to its former stature, the role of the media with its foolish questions, phony polls and attempts at negative persuasion is a national disgrace. Why should you dislike a person who you don't know? How ignorant can we get? Do we like Sponge Bob?
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Barack Flip - Flobama at it again! Change - His platform should be 'I will change my position as needed"
15 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let see if I get this straight. You can be a former drug user who stole prescriptions and abused the trust of your own charity, have tax problems, charge up to $500,000 in one month on your credit card, set up your husband in politics after he left his disfigured wife -- and still be more popular?
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Let's just give these monsters all the rights while we are at it ( NOT ).Where are the rights of the VICTIMS from 9/11?Where are the rights of the on going killing innocent people who are non muslims all over the world? Do not bother to win the hearts and mind of these monsters.They will continue with the killing until we are all dead or become their slaves. From an Asian woman person who treasures her freedom.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe Machelle should die her head blonde. Or steal another woman's husband. Unbelievable. And what about John McCain saying "I never really loved my country until deprived of its". This paper really sucks.
4 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Obama is radical liberal pretending to be in the middle and promising Change he has no business doing- since he is not experianced in so many areas of life nor a true American patriot. For those who support a church going elitist hating the USA for 20 years be aware Obama is nothing more than a true hypocrit. If you worked hard all your life, for example, and happen to be rich you SHOULD NOT be obligated to give to the poor, as he wants, the poor need to work hard, too, like all the rest of us. You might not get rich, in this life, but you need to live with honorable American standards. MCCAIN WILL WIN.
13 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Michelle Obama is completely unacceptable as first lady. Hopefully if he is chosen she will keep well out of the spotlight and behind the scenes. I can't decide what I find more distasteful. Her elitist attitude, her condescending remarks, or her blatant attempt to duplicate Jackie O's signature look. Lest we forget this woman also sat in Reverend Wrights congregation with her husband and children and didn't notice the racist and inflammatory sermons either. (Yeah right)
15 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
While Barack Obama is trying to recalibrate his positions on gun rights = This is the POST CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN terminlogy for Flip Flop.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Keep Washington out of our Churches, Temples and Mosques. Everything politians touch gets corrupted. Keep faith and politics seperated. And stop giving Religious organizations tax exemptions when they practice influencing politics. Hold them financially responsible like every other business.
5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
General Clark said what a whole lot of people are saying and thinking, and I thank him for it. Hell, Jeffrey Dahmer spent time in the military, too. Does that make Jeffrey a hero?
8 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Obama doesn’t get that we are in a new age, where “military might is essential,” To suggest, as Obama has, that the way to deal with terrorists is to prosecute them “bespeaks a remarkable lack of understanding of the threat which we face,” “What we’re facing right now in al-Qaida and global violent jihadism is an enemy which has relatively crude weapons but highly motivated warriors,” he says. “Over the next decade or two, they will surely obtain highly sophisticated weapons with massive casualty potential. Now is the time to stop this enemy, because the consequences of ignoring them until they have massive casualty capability are almost unthinkable.”
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
AMERICA CALLING said:
maybe the truth does hurt how about it bama
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Obama IS unfairly attacking John McCain, and will allow unfair attacks by others, like MSNBC, in as an inflammatory an affront as has ever been seen in American Politics. I include the "Clinton Lie Machine" that kept Slick Willie from facing the justice he so richly deserved. I recall the ad opposing George W.Bush that showed a black man being dragged behind a pickup truck to a brutal death...clearly implying that George Bush supported such depravity! Expect more of the same OLD politics of the style Obama so strongly denounces... unless it's to his advantage. He is a "narrow" politician HAVING to rely on DNC operatives for his thinking, It will be his downfall. It's inevitable that the gloves will come off, and he will gleefully LEAD the charge. Barak believes that it's a mortal sin(See Dicky Durban's statement)to question his wife's public statements... but is silent when DNC surrogates inhabiting newsrooms attack Mrs. McCain. Mr. Obama ... get real!
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Obama is a Christian/? Right!!!! After getting his law degree at Harvard he signs up. Hmmmm? Wants to run for president, so he pretends to quit smoking. Asked about Rev Wright he initially lies claiming he never heard any of those statements. And he allowed the party to be split by looking the other way a his supporters and Chris Matthews mischaracterized the Clintons innocuous comments as racist. Truly a different kind of politician.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
wayne helmore said:
Thanks for the article. It’s really new to me; I hope it brings awareness to other person who doesn’t aware with a plan to actually create one.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
First and Foremost BO is a polititian. If it is ok for him to use inflammatory remarks, it is just as acceptable for Ralph Nader too. Nader also asks some very pointed and correct questions. It would be nice if the real candidates we have left could answer the questions directly so we can vote on the real issues, not on campaign rhetoric.
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nader is a jerk! Pauline Nixon Minneapolis MN
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Clinton does not want Obama to win, for her own good and for the country's own good- she said he was not experianced enough- And now-She feels differantly? She is a liar- always was- always will be.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Clinton has quite the EGO- She thinks it is because of her and her status and so called experiance that women need to address more self serving respectable jobs- & issues- Clinton further states /implies that women deserve respect- WELL- so do MEN BUT we all have to earn it- NO- I cannot give her credit for anything- or reccommend her for advice-- she has some nerve to make people feel like it is because of her accomplishments that women should succeed in life-- ) ( of course they should but you need to prove that you DID SOMETHING.. WHAT ACCOMPLISHMENTS HAS CLINTON SUCCEEDED AT???! Clinton will fade away once Obama loses and that is just fine with me, both of them, Obama & Clinton have some AUDACITY! Women don't need HILLARY CLINTON to help them in any way- Why she needs Obama's help is beyond me. If she really was Independant and experianced why ask anyone else to help pay your debts. ALL LIES..Obama is the next BUSH.
8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Knot2brite said:
Now that Hillary Clinton has conceded the Democtatic nomination to Barack Obama finally he can turn his attention to this formidable opponent: Ralph Nader, just in case he needs someone to blame for losing the general election to Republican John McCain.
7 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Nader,sit down. You are always right but no one cares.
6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So, McCain served in war.....all discouned by his support of Bush policies. He and his posessed looking wife scare me.
6 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Inflammatory remarks are good. They might inflame the public to wake up and pay attention. They are still legal in Ameica, right?
13 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ok dude, you are delusional as well,lol...I agree that obama has to prove himself as capable to be the president of america and not just black america; he shouldn't have to but unfortunately this still amerikkka. A lot of White people are scared of the thought of having a black pres. because of there own guilt for what they've done to keep black people as a second-class sub-human race. The beautiful thing is that barack doesn't have to prove a thing about his blackness to nader or anyone else. Why should he? If you're black then you already know the deal. So idiot, what has barack lied about?
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
ALL TALK- NEVER ANY ACTION! ( When Obama refers to Kennedy then he must realize Kennedy's statement : "It is not what your country can do for you - but what you can do for your country" - That should be enough to see that: OBAMA HAS DONE NOTHING FOR HIS COUNTRY, but LIE! Obama is the next BUSH, not MCCAIN. MCCAIN 2008- 2012
14 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don't waste your vote. Vote Bob Barr.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What the Hell do you mean Just a Senator...Same old crap as the saying just a woman. It took a black woman to stand up for her rights and go to the front of the bus ..Now it would take a woman to lead this country the men sure in hell have done a horrible job the last 8 years.. Hillary is a very strong and intelligent woman. Obama is great just not enough experience..come back in another 8 years and I will vote for you.It should have been Hillary and Obama Then we would be in a better place.I just do not understand all this race junk.. God created us All Equal...Thank you
11 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A.Yanora said:
Mr. Obama has made it public that if you do not vote for him it's because he is not white. He is trying to make white people feel guilty of being racist. He forgets some of us read, his policies will if nothing else put this country into a state of socialism we will never recover from. The purpose of the Democratic party is to create a state where the goverment (Democrates) can tell you what is right for you. Take away your choice and make people beholding to the goverment for not just medical care but food, how much energy one can use to heat or cool their houses and how much gas we can use, how far we can travel. Obama has said this publicaly, this is as close to the words he used as I recall, we in the US cannot continue to heat our houses to 75 degrees and expect the rest of the world to respect us. Well I traveled to Europe heating their homes appeared to not be an issue for them. Whatwas a disgrace was the fact they cannot wash cloths and vacuum at the same time. "SOCIAlISM"
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Why can't you idiots get over 2000?! George Bush won! Then he beat Kerry in 2004 in a LANDSLIDE victory.Yale graduate and MBA from Harvard-the only President to get an MBA. He gave this country 54 months of economic growth after 9 11. The unemployment stayed under 5% which is unheard of. Clinton's 8% was hearalded as the finest! The stock market went to over 14000 from around 10000 when he took office. He lowered taxes like John Kennedy and Regan did which brought more revenue into he federal government because more wealthy people invested knowing they would not have to pay as much taxes. He never gets any credit for any of this. He stood up to the terrorist attacks and we haven't been hit since. Unlike Clinton, who gave the '93 WTC terrorists due process rights. There were countless attacks after that. It's the hate of Bush that gets an unqualified far left Marxist as the Dem candidate who hadn't spent 400 days in the Senate. Mcain spent 1092 days in a Viet Nam torture prison.
14 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Vietnam Veteran said:
Its amazing to see the code words written by these undercover racist, closested Republicans.No experience,never served in the military etc. Bush and Chaney had experience where are we at to day. Senator McCann, a veteran has opposed just about every bill that would benefit veterans. Senator Obama didn't get where he is today by being a token or dummy, look at how he ran his campaign, so get of your excuses and say what you really are.
10 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
a faux president for the last seven and a half years. that mr 12:07 june 24 suits john mccain and all other neo commie repubs to a tee!
10 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree