California News

Multimedia News

LA and Philly battle for the pennant
20 photos
Justin Maiuro of Mantua, NJ, shows off his Ph...
PETA gets naked and bloody again
16 photos
Partially clothed protesters seen with taped ...
Cute dogs, bulls and a green polar bear
15 photos
Dogs wait in line to be blessed during a bles...
High School Musical 3 Debate: Tisdale vs. Hudgens
20 photos
U.S. actress Ashley Tisdale arrives for the B...
Sexiest men alive
20 photos
In this July 25, 2008 file photo, San Diego C...

Council debates moving homeless family to county-owned home

Apr 30, 2008 12:00 AM (163 days ago) by Kathleen Miller, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: WASHINGTON

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - A homeless family may be moved into a county-owned, five-bedroom Bethesda house that was purchased as part of a park expansion project, sparking dissent at a Montgomery County Council meeting Tuesday.

The county spent $2.5 million last fall to buy 1.3 acres of space near Bethesda’s Hillmead Park, ending a multiyear dispute over the future of the site: The former landowner had sought to sell the property to a developer to build a four-home subdivision on the lot, but some neighbors objected, and the county swooped in to purchase the site to expand Hillmead Neighborhood Park. Council Member Roger Berliner, who represents the residents who live near the property, proposed razing the house.

“Our county’s $2.5 million investment in additional parkland can only be fully realized if the existing structure is taken down,” Berliner said.

Council Member George Leventhal, who chairs the council’s Health and Human Services Committee, wants to move in a needy family.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“I cannot in good conscience vote to demolish that home while there are so many people in need of housing in Montgomery County,” Leventhal said.

County planning board officials have recommended the house be demolished and the land it occupies be used to expand the park.

Council members will vote on the two proposals in mid-June.

kmiller@dcexaminer.com

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

10:43 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 6, 2008 re: "Waiting-list for low-income housing open in Montgomery"

Telisa said:
I am 17 years old. me and my 4month old daughter need a place to stay...we need help....how do i go about moving in a HUD property ASAP??

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:11 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 20, 2008 re: "Tenants-rights group planning forum"

Examiner Reader/Nadia said:
I have NO idea if you can help But Im going to take a shot at it - Last FRI there was Gun fire exchanged at my apartmnt complex right infront of my door. I have a month to month lease and have put in my 30 day notice to move out since i feel extremely unsafe. How can I move before the 30 days are up without being charged?

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:10 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "The City's housing boom"

Wai Yip Tung said:
By adding 60,000 units over 20 years, this housing 'boom' represent an annual growth rate of 0.77%.

6 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:54 PM MST on Thu., Aug. 14, 2008 re: "The City's housing boom"

Examiner Reader said:
No matter Mr. Metcalf's take on the real estate market, i have lived in SF since 1979 and, to the best of my knowledge, not a single-building boom has significantly effected the price of housing one way or the other, however, clearly (and arguably, unfortunately) real estate "bubbles" have. Even today's Chronicle states the Assessor's office in SF is overhwelmed with homeowners seeking a re-assessemnent of property values because of falling prices. My guess is that has more to do with the real estate "bubble" bursting than available housing on the market.

7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:53 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 6, 2008 re: "Housing funds for MontCo employees go unused"

Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
The county this year increased property tax revenues 14% with another huge increase expected next year. Reduce spending, and hence the next for more tax increases, by $500,000.

10 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:50 PM MST on Wed., Aug. 6, 2008 re: "Housing funds for MontCo employees go unused"

Examiner reader said:
Knapp might run against Leggett for County Executive? If that happened, Knapp would surely win. Given the choice of a fiscally irresponsible, clueless, pandering politition or a tool for the developers, the voters will probably choose the tool for the developers.

10 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:04 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 9, 2008 re: "Residents want independent investigation of Howard Housing Commission"

Examiner Reader said:
Wow! It is unbelievable the amount of selfishness that I see in people who do live in these establishments. I suppose they have the mentality of give back to the community...but not on my block. Let me tell you...I ended up in this type of housing for a year. Thank GOD it was there! I relocated from LA to MD for a $120k/yr. job which I ended up being wrongfully terminated from when I caught pneumonia. As a single mother, an educated professional, worked in my field for 17 years...I was humbled. Don't let your fill yourself with so much gusto, God has a way of humbling those on their high horse.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:13 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Waiting-list for low-income housing open in Montgomery"

Examiner Reader said:
hello my name is korena i live in jhonson homes which is pha/lowincome i am looking to get a transfer out of philly how can i do that

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:31 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008 re: "Residents displaced decades ago may receive reprieve"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, that's exactly what we need, project thugs in nice new developments. I don't think so!

8 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:47 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Model house for state becomes a headache for homeowners"

Reader said:
Get a fix it man and stop whining!

9 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:55 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008 re: "Model house for state becomes a headache for homeowners"

Examiner Reader said:
"Department of Labor, Licensing and Regulation" Run by Thomas Perez, ex chairman of the board of Casa de Md. I wonder if he allowed illegal aliens to fix or certify the roof.

9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:28 AM MST on Fri., Jul. 13, 2007 re: "Tenants-rights group planning forum"

Norwood Apts Reader said:
As a tenant at the Norwood I take issue with your characterization of tenants as welfare seekers. These tenants are working class low income people who work service jobs in DC. Some tenants work in the mail room at the White House, waiters at Old Ebbitt Grill, or cleaning offices. These people are the ones who help our city run and we deserve to have a decent place to live. By decent I mean demanding a proper working elevator that does not take 31 days to repair.

375 agree | 261 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:06 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 15, 2007 re: "Residents want affordable housing in Howard"

Examiner Reader said:
Columbia doesn't need anymore housing.....Most of the individuals at the meeting, are those seeking welfare and goverment funded housing........

299 agree | 280 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:34 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 6, 2007 re: "Fairfax supervisors close home ‘additions’ loophole"

Examiner Reader said:
When will this new policy take place?

643 agree | 289 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:25 AM MST on Sun., May. 27, 2007 re: "Economist: Foreclosure 'bloodbath' on horizon"

Silver Springer said:
This is a remarkably important story and the Examiner deserves a lot of credit for digging it out. while bigger papers in Baltimore and Washington failed to do so. Mortgage regulators should have stopped the current binge of looney loans years ago. They failed to do so and now large numbers of homeowners are facing foreclosure -- and more will in the future. That's a terrible price to pay to sell more loans and to inflate short-term lender profits.

301 agree | 275 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement