Group convened to discuss housing in downtown area of Columbia
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Columbia, Md (Map, News) - General Growth Properties Inc. convened a group to address housing in downtown Columbia — a major piece of the redevelopment not included in the first wave of plans.

Affordable housing is an “important piece,” said Greg Hamm, GGP’s general manager for Columbia, who offered few details.

Hamm tapped five experts to advise the developer on housing, which will be incorporated into future phases of the plan.

“I think what [GGP is] recognizing here is they lack community will and political will for affordable housing,” said Sherman Howell, a former member of the county’s Affordable Housing Task Force selected for GGP’s committee.

The committee will have to reach out to the community to build support for a full spectrum of housing, he said.

The company plans to submit a zoning change to the County Council this summer to allow for residential development.

But the first phase doesn’t include housing.

The original plan, released in October 2005 after months of public discussion, recommended 5,500 new housing units in downtown Columbia, and Hamm said GGP’s zoning request won’t increase that amount.

Alan Klein, spokesman for activist group Coalition for Columbia’s Downtown, which has advocated for less density, said he was concerned GGP would ask for approval of residential development without presenting more details on the housing plans.

Hamm said more details will be given during community meetings between now and June. Residents are divided on the appropriate amount of housing, and some said it made sense to postpone the residential piece.

“This gives us some breathing room and [lets GGP] build good things that are not contentious,” said Jud Malone, a former Columbia Association board member.

Councilwoman Mary Kay Sigaty, D-District 4, said because the plan will unfold over 30 years, the infrastructure will change to accommodate the housing.

smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

11:37 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Columbia residents express concerns about infill proposal"

Lifelong Columbia Resident said:
It is always about the greed. They want to cash in on the older neighborhoods with larger lots. They can build a McMansion on Wilde Lake, or stuff 2-3 homes on a 1/3rd acre lot. It is all about which developer has enough grease for the squeeky wheels in the County Council. I've lived here my entire life and Columbia is turning into a sewer like Baltimore. Our "leaders" are out of touch with reality, they only have special interest in mind when they propose legislation. This not the Columbia vision we bought into in 1968, the elitists are running the show now. And public transportation is the last thing Columbia needs, we have enough problems without importing more. If people can't afford a car what can they buy at the Mall? Look at Owings Mills after the subway went in. Why don't the folks in the county council figure out how to curb crime? Or find productive things for our children to do instead of doing drugs and having babies. Stop filling your pocket with kickbacks and do your j

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

10:57 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
I used to work for Howard Co., and believe me, the current bus routes aren't full by any means. Therefore, I don't believe there is a need for more public transportation, especially in a town with affluent residents who commute. But I'm sure Ulman would love to funnel money into this anyway.

4 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:12 AM MST on Wed., May. 14, 2008 re: "Funding unclear for Columbia downtown public transit plans"

Examiner Reader said:
Public transportation will not make Columbia Mall (downtown is a joke) more attractive. It will destroy the mall, just look up the road in Reisterstown. If GGP and Wells believe it is needed they are free to reach into their pockets to pay for it. They are not welcome to reach into mine.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:15 PM MST on Sun., Jan. 27, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
My vision for Columbia involves a qualified County Executive. Maybe one day Howard County will make that dream come true.

61 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:41 PM MST on Sat., Jan. 12, 2008 re: "Community remains divided on Howard’s vision for Columbia"

Examiner Reader said:
Ulman said he was going to block the tower in Columbia during his campaign. Then, he gets elected and does nothing. I can't trust this guy. His vision for Columbia likely panders to everyone, like he did to get elected.

51 agree | 48 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.19 seconds)