CBS2-KCAL // 23 mins ago
Examiner.com // 49 mins ago
Examiner.com // 1 hr 4 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 26 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 52 mins ago
Daily News // 2 hrs 4 mins ago
KTLA.com // 2 hrs 21 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 2 hrs 24 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs 40 mins ago
KTLA.com // 3 hrs ago
 
   
Caltrain cameras would aid investigation process
Article History
There are updates to this article.

San Mateo County (Map, News) - Caltrain is set to install a new set of eyes to keep watch on its tracks, which have been the site of a number of fatalities this year.

The transit agency will soon secure $500,000 in state funds to make locomotives into moving cameras. Caltrain, which transports about 40,000 people each weekday between San Francisco and San Jose, plans to mount 60 cameras, one on each end of all its trains, with lenses facing the tracks.

The new cameras would help the agency’s police identify what happened before trains hit pedestrians and aid with other security issues.

The rail agency has cameras at unnamed stations but not on or inside trains.

As of Monday, there have been six deaths on the tracks this year, following seven in 2007. Three of the six deaths this year have been ruled suicides by the County Coroner’s Office, as have five of last year’s deaths.

Caltrain spokeswoman Christine Dunn said the transit police currently rely on the conductor’s view and firsthand reports when investigating deaths on the tracks.

“We wanted to have more information about what was happening on the [tracks],” Dunn said.

There has been no discussion among Caltrain’s administration and board of directors about installing cameras inside the actual cabins, Dunn added.

Dunn said the agency still has no date or range for installation of the cameras once the funding is secured in June.

Only the agency’s transit police, who are pulled from the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office, will have access to the cameras’ footage. The cameras will stay rolling while the trains are moving and while parked overnight.

Voters approved money for the Caltrain cameras in November 2006 by passing Proposition 1B, a $20 billion bond issue that included $1 billion for public-transit system safety enhancements, California Homeland Security spokesman Jay Alan said.

Caltrain is funding the project entirely from the proposition, which is distributed by the California Governor’s Office of Homeland Security. Caltrain is also set to receive about $440,000 for other security enhancements from the same department.

In addition to the cameras, Caltrain will be receiving money for a rail spur that will allow the Menlo Park Fire Department to transport search and rescue materials by train should bridges or freeways collapse or become unusable during an emergency.

mrosenberg@examiner.com

By the numbers

2 Cameras per train

60 Total cameras for entire fleet

$500,000 Cost for cameras

$939,246 Total Homeland Security grant

Proposition 1B Voter-approved bond measure supplying funds

55 Miles of track the cameras will monitor

6 People fatally struck by Caltrains this year

Source: Caltrain


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

9:14 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Caltrain deaths a fact of engineers’ lives"

Examiner Reader said:
Regarding what grumpy Martin Engel said in the first comment. Maybe Caltrain has a legitimate concern in wanting to cover their a**. I know for a fact that the families many of those yahoos who walk around the downed crossing gates and right in front of the trains, ignoring blaring horns, lights and bells seek out the first ambulance chasing lawyer they can find and sue the railroad. Personal responsibility in today's world? You've got to be kidding! It was all that bad old railroad's fault, even if their beloved was drunk and laying on the tracks or had his head half way up his you-know-what!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:53 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Caltrain cameras would aid investigation process"

Martin Engel said:
Cameras? A million dollar grant? Half a million for the cameras? Why? Will that make the tracks any safer? I don't think so. Then, what are they for? They will relieve Caltrain and its personnel from any liability by documenting how none of the accidents/fatalities are their fault. In Mike Rosenberg's article, he even uses the headline to make my point, only in a much more neutral way. (To put it bluntly, it's a free "cover-their-a**" investment!) The other reason is that getting "free" money, like grants, is what government organizations do. Getting and spending the money is more important than solving any problem. The money comes from the 1-B bond issue, one billion of which was earmarked for "public-transit system safety enhancements." How cameras will make the train corridor safer is an explanation I would like to hear. Fencing? Four-Quad Gates? Sure. But cameras? Post-mortem?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:35 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "Sixth death on tracks in 2008 is woman, 63"

Examiner Reader said:
Engineer not conductor. Engineers are opereating the train.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:39 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
Be happy that people with insight and vision found a way to agree and build BART decades ago...I moved to Hawaii (from SF) and my commute wastes 3 hours each day on Oahu (just to get to work) by car. If I take the bus, add an hour each way. It's just as fast to bicycle the entire distance (35 miles to Waianae). Why? Because our city council killed "rail transit" 16 years ago...and they're are still not in agreement! I would recommend bicycling to others but the lack of adequate (safe) bike paths makes it so dangerous I won't even take my children riding to the beach...so stop whining and ride BART, MUNI, or your BIKE...It's the only long term solution for a sustainable future

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm looking forward to the silver lining, when some of the new, more affluent, better-connected riders pitch a fit about how difficult and miserable it is to get around on the bus. No insult to the drivers: you're stuck, too, and make my day when you try to get us all on board and where we need to go.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:03 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
I wish I can believe that people are starting to care about our environment by taking public transit, but I think it has more to do with high gas prices than anything else.

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:06 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Lack of funds may dead-end transit projects"

Examiner Reader said:
MUNI's inability to service existing lines didn't stop the T-line from being built. The city will likely continue such transit line construction to create the illusion that adequate transit service exists in any number of neighborhoods, for any number of housing developments. As far as I can tell, these new lines are being built (as selling points) to satisfy developers as much as serving ridership.

51 agree | 49 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:07 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007 re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm with Seven on this one. How is yet another MUNI line going to be adequately serviced when MUNI cannot even adequately serve existing lines?

51 agree | 57 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:29 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007 re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"

Seven said:
Couldn't we skip the central subway and use the money to actually improve Muni?

53 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)