Sixth death on tracks in 2008 is woman, 63
Article History
There are updates to this article.

Bay Area (Map, News) - A 63-year-old woman lay down on the railroad tracks before she was struck and killed in Atherton on Sunday, the third time in as many weeks that the transit agency’s trains have fatally struck a pedestrian.

Train No. 442’s conductor saw an unknown object on the tracks one-fifth of a mile north of the Atherton station at 7:05 p.m., Caltrain spokeswoman Christine Dunn said. The conductor attempted an emergency stop, Dunn said, but was unable to halt the train before it killed the woman, identified Monday as Zenith Freedman.

Freedman did not have a verified city of residence that could be located Monday, San Mateo County Coroner Robert Foucrault said.

The death marks the sixth time a pedestrian has been struck and killed by a Caltrain this year after seven were killed all of last year. The highest number of fatal incidents in a calendar year is 17, which occurred in 2006.

Freedman’s death also marks the third Caltrain fatality in the last three weeks. Three of the deaths this year had already been ruled suicides by the Coroner’s Office. The causes of death in the other three accidents were undetermined, Dunn said.

The southbound train had been scheduled to stop at the Atherton station before hitting Freedman. The northbound track was reopened at 7:40 p.m. and both sides of the rail were available for use by 9 p.m.

A Caltrain struck and killed Menlo Park resident Stephen Lehane, 66, April 7 in Menlo Park in what the San Mateo County Coroner’s Office ruled a suicide.

Another Caltrain fatally struck Anthony Rea, 15, of South San Francisco, at the north end of San Bruno station on April 19 when the El Camino High School freshman skateboarded around a lowered crossing gate while wearing headphones.

mrosenberg@examiner.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

2:42 PM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."

Examiner Reader said:
I'm not familiar with the Federal Law that is referenced in the article. Please specify the Federal Law.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

3:58 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 23, 2008 re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."

Examiner Reader said:
A smart proposal for Commuter Checks or something similar. I work for SFSU, and while this legislation is does not have any jurisdiction on State of California property, we are the only California State University offering this program to its employees. It is pre-taxed from your payroll, and I felt it was simple enough to spend a couple of minutes to fill out the paperwork and place my order online. And presto! My check came in the mail. Even easier, instead of asking for a check, you can have an actual pass, and even BART tickets mailed to you. Translink now offers automatic uploading of electronic cash to your account too. This means you don't have to hassle with claiming the check.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:32 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 21, 2008 re: "Commuters ready to launch"

Examiner Reader said:
Ferry project sounds like a good one. With the the cities and state broke, how will it be paid for?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:41 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"

Examiner Reader said:
While this program could have considerable benefits, how is MUNI going to handle the increased ridership when it appears fully-challenged servicing existing ridership?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:18 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."

Examiner Reader said:
Ah the communist nation of San Francisco and Comrade Smikirmi is at it again. I don't think they should require small businesses to offer this to employees. If Matthew the coffee shop barista wants to be paid for his commute, then he should find an office job. Those companies offer commuter benefits. When will the regulation of small business in SF end?

0 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:28 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "Commuter checks could be mandated in S.F."

Examiner Reader said:
Getting more city employees out of their cars is actually quite easy: cut the number of parking spaces available to employees, or make them more expensive.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:14 AM MST on Mon., May. 12, 2008 re: "Caltrain deaths a fact of engineers’ lives"

Examiner Reader said:
Regarding what grumpy Martin Engel said in the first comment. Maybe Caltrain has a legitimate concern in wanting to cover their a**. I know for a fact that the families many of those yahoos who walk around the downed crossing gates and right in front of the trains, ignoring blaring horns, lights and bells seek out the first ambulance chasing lawyer they can find and sue the railroad. Personal responsibility in today's world? You've got to be kidding! It was all that bad old railroad's fault, even if their beloved was drunk and laying on the tracks or had his head half way up his you-know-what!

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:53 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Caltrain cameras would aid investigation process"

Martin Engel said:
Cameras? A million dollar grant? Half a million for the cameras? Why? Will that make the tracks any safer? I don't think so. Then, what are they for? They will relieve Caltrain and its personnel from any liability by documenting how none of the accidents/fatalities are their fault. In Mike Rosenberg's article, he even uses the headline to make my point, only in a much more neutral way. (To put it bluntly, it's a free "cover-their-a**" investment!) The other reason is that getting "free" money, like grants, is what government organizations do. Getting and spending the money is more important than solving any problem. The money comes from the 1-B bond issue, one billion of which was earmarked for "public-transit system safety enhancements." How cameras will make the train corridor safer is an explanation I would like to hear. Fencing? Four-Quad Gates? Sure. But cameras? Post-mortem?

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:35 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "Sixth death on tracks in 2008 is woman, 63"

Examiner Reader said:
Engineer not conductor. Engineers are opereating the train.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:39 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
Be happy that people with insight and vision found a way to agree and build BART decades ago...I moved to Hawaii (from SF) and my commute wastes 3 hours each day on Oahu (just to get to work) by car. If I take the bus, add an hour each way. It's just as fast to bicycle the entire distance (35 miles to Waianae). Why? Because our city council killed "rail transit" 16 years ago...and they're are still not in agreement! I would recommend bicycling to others but the lack of adequate (safe) bike paths makes it so dangerous I won't even take my children riding to the beach...so stop whining and ride BART, MUNI, or your BIKE...It's the only long term solution for a sustainable future

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm looking forward to the silver lining, when some of the new, more affluent, better-connected riders pitch a fit about how difficult and miserable it is to get around on the bus. No insult to the drivers: you're stuck, too, and make my day when you try to get us all on board and where we need to go.

1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:03 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Bay Area public transit as popular as ever"

Examiner Reader said:
I wish I can believe that people are starting to care about our environment by taking public transit, but I think it has more to do with high gas prices than anything else.

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:06 PM MST on Thu., Feb. 14, 2008 re: "Lack of funds may dead-end transit projects"

Examiner Reader said:
MUNI's inability to service existing lines didn't stop the T-line from being built. The city will likely continue such transit line construction to create the illusion that adequate transit service exists in any number of neighborhoods, for any number of housing developments. As far as I can tell, these new lines are being built (as selling points) to satisfy developers as much as serving ridership.

53 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:07 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007 re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"

Examiner Reader said:
I'm with Seven on this one. How is yet another MUNI line going to be adequately serviced when MUNI cannot even adequately serve existing lines?

53 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:29 PM MST on Mon., Dec. 31, 2007 re: "Federal bill to include $13.5M for S.F. transportation"

Seven said:
Couldn't we skip the central subway and use the money to actually improve Muni?

55 agree | 54 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)