Nieves has the Wil to win
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - Remember Jim Hegan? Chances are you probably don’t, since Hegan last played in 1960. Regardless, Hegan was a catcher in the big leagues for 17 seasons, mostly with the Cleveland Indians. For 10 of those seasons he was the regular catcher for the Tribe, handling a staff that featured a trio of Hall of Famers in its rotation: Bob Feller, Bob Lemon, and Early Wynn, along with 3-time All-Star Mike Garcia. Hegan is the name that frequently comes up when baseball people refer to catchers who are predominantly “catch-and-throw” guys, which is another way of saying they don’t hit much (Hegan batted .228 for his career), but their skills behind the plate are so superior, you really have to let them play.

Ladies and gentleman, meet Wil Nieves. That’s Wil with only one “l,” short for Wilbert.

Nieves was signed by the Nationals as a minor league free agent last winter. At 30, it’s likely the Nats looked at Wil as someone who could help out in spring training, and be a mentor to the catching prospects coming up through the farm system. Having signed major league free agent catchers Paul LoDuca and Johnny Estrada to take over for the departed Brian Schneider, Nieves didn’t appear to have much of an immediate big league future.

Frequently, however, things happen for a reason, and when Estrada was hurt in spring training, Nieves got a few more springtime look-sees. He still didn’t make the opening day roster, but the club decided they wanted future everyday catcher Jesus Flores catch everyday in the minors, and then LoDuca got whacked on the hand by a pitch, and — voila! — Nieves is wearing a big league uniform again.

Nieves, you see, has played in the majors before, just not very much. He began the 2006-2007 seasons in Yankee pinstripes, backing up Jorge Posada. He totaled 67 at-bats over those two years in the Bronx, with just 10 hits. He had broken into the majors with San Diego (where his older brother Melvin had played) in 2002, hitting just .181 in 28 games. He had actually been a pretty decent hitter in the minors going back to 1996 — .287 in nearly 3,500 at-bats — but his big league label was good catch-no hit.

Until this past week, that is. On Friday night Nieves hit his first big league home run, a walk-off 2-run shot on a 2-strike pitch — to the opposite field no less — that beat the Cubs 5-3. He had another key RBI in Sunday’s shutout victory over Chicago, and is hitting .350, albeit in just 20 at-bats. He’s putting the bat on the ball, plain and simple.

I’m not suggesting for a moment that Nieves should be the everyday catcher, but on defensive skills alone, he’s the best receiver the club has. Old-time baseball men use the designation “receiver” only for the best defensive catchers, and Nieves has earned the title. Still, what to do when LoDuca’s able to play again? The switch-hitting Estrada is a valuable tool off the bench, and both he and LoDuca are making guaranteed 7-figure salaries. It’s a dilemma.

I can’t imagine it’s a decision either Jim Bowden or Manny Acta are particularly looking forward to. Think they’ll ask for input from the pitching staff?

Hear Phil Wood Saturdays at 10 a.m. on SportsTalk 980 AM and is a contributor to Nats Xtra on MASN. Contact him at philwood@dcexaminer.com.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

6:33 PM MST on Sun., Apr. 27, 2008 re: "‘The 21st Century Ripken’"

Examiner Reader said:
There are many Nationals fans who are still patient with the team. I remember how Edward Bennett Williams as well as Peter Angelos tried---and failed---to build a winner with the Orioles by buying free agents. But my biggest nightmare is that once Zimmerman's contract runs out, he will sign a lucrative deal with another club because (a) the Lerners are unwilling to pay the money to keep him when they have the chance, (b) Zimmerman has no faith that the franchise will become a playoff contender anytime in his career, or (c) all of the above. Maybe the Lerners are smart by forcing Zimmerman to prove his worth this year, but if he has a breakout year and then flies the coop like Alfonso Soriano, fans' faith in The Plan will vanish like the wind. Edward J. Cunningham Rockville, MD

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

2:00 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner Reader said:
Gee, Phil, thanks. I'm glad you reminded us that we're all raving idiots and that you have been appointed by MENSA to set us straight. "It’s perfectly plain that the issue is offense." I'm glad we have an "expert" like you to tell us this. Hm. All along, I thought the problem was that Nationals Park doesn't have enough cupholders!!!

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:34 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
Phil, is it ok for fans who call in to your radio show to comment on the Nats' play? Or are they also ignorant folks who know nothing about facts or logic?

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:18 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Don’t panic yet"

Examiner reader said:
What an arrogant, condescending column this is. Fans shouldn't comment about and criticize the team because they don't know enough about baseball? Fans don't know what's going on in the dugout or in the clubhouse? Well why don't you tell us then, Phil, and disabuse us of our shallow, uninformed nonsense. And most fans agree that Lenny Harris did a terrific job last year? Really? Maybe it is you who is uninformed, Phil. (And anyway, who cares what the uninformed *fans* think?) Did you know that the Nats came very close in the offseason to not retaining Harris because they thought that he did not do a good job and was not ready to be a major league hitting coach?

6 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:59 PM MST on Thu., Dec. 13, 2007 re: "New park feels like home already"

natsbaseball.com said:
Thanks Phil. Sounds wonderful - can't wait to see it. Being about the same age I remember attending the first baseball game at DC Stadium after experiencing Griffith for one or two seasons as a young child. It was a world of improvement over the falling down older park. After baseball returned 34 years later and about 15 years of going to Camden, RFK was, of course, kind of stark (I think is was designed by Joseph Stalin) but we all knew it was temporary and to have a home team again we would have put up with a lot worse. My only regret is the new stadium is in a location that couldn't be harder to get to for most of the area's fans. People are whining about the lack of parking - but it doesn't matter as there are no roads. Metro is bragging about being able to carry about 10,000 fans and hour. Since most of the 41,000 fans who could show up will have to go by metro - I cringe at the 4 hour trips it will take to get home. In that regard RFK had it all over the new park.

101 agree | 95 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 AM MST on Wed., Oct. 3, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

kjack said:
Another great article Phil. Why those idiots at espn[The world wide leader in crap]and fox don't hire informed,aware, and intelligent individuals like you. To inform the general public of the things that really matter in baseball. I'll personalll never understand.

188 agree | 211 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Tue., Oct. 2, 2007 re: "Expect Bowden, Nats to make significant noise in the offseason"

EdDC said:
Phil, What do you think of going after Coco Crisp? He is still young and had back to back .300 seasons not long ago in Cleveland. Nats need a CF. Crisp didn't do much in BoSox pressure cooker, like Wily Mo Pena. So Crisp might benefit from just relaxing, knowing the world is not on his shoulders. His contract is reasonable: Covelli Crisp of 3 years/$15.5M (2007-09), plus $8M 2010 club option As to Bowden, I like him asking for the world. He tries hard and contacts many many teams, and if one or two bite, then Nats come out ahead. This is better than just trading to make trades.

243 agree | 225 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 11, 2007 re: "Perhaps it’d be better to keep Young around"

Pope John Paul Ringo George said:
"Did you ever hear any specific player’s names that would’ve ended up here in exchange for the Fonz?" This is a poor argument. The reason the Nats never get serious offers in trade for Soriano, Dmitri, Cordero, Rauch, etc is becuase Bowden's asking price is not serious. He makes it known that you can only trade for a Nat if you're willing to be ripped off in the trade. His asking price starts so high, teams won't even attempt to negotiate with him. Then he comes back and says "hey, we never got any serious offers!" No sane, competent GM will ever trade with him on anyting above replacement level players.

276 agree | 226 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:47 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 27, 2007 re: "Orioles could repeat managerial history with Trembley"

Norm said:
Trembley has got this team behind him. I like his vision. You can see it in the way this team is playing since he replaced Perlozzo. The Weaver like experience you cite nails it and is a huge bonus. It's precisely what the O's need to get to the next level. The way I see it, NONE of the other current candidates brings anything comparable to the table. With McPhail and Trembley, we are already on the right track.

300 agree | 796 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:52 PM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A long, winding road from Baltimore"

Examiner Reader said:
I agree in that the Orioles should trade for Teixeira. There will be many teams after him. The "Dallas News" has an article that Boston, Dodgers, and Tigers may be interested. We should offer Cabrera, and two other players. Texas needs a starting pitcher. In the article he says the other teams would offer a pitching prospect. At least Cabrera has pitched in the majors the last three years. The Orioles would be set for the next 8 years at first base. That would be a nice infield. Also, go get Torri Hunter next year in free agency for center field.

347 agree | 260 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:07 PM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "O's game gives umps a black eye"

Dan said:
So is MLB saying that the score of a game has no impact on strategy? As far as Jay's comment: "The rules were followed." I don't think I ever read anywhere in the MLB rule book where you can score a run while you are on defense. The apeal was not that the run should not count, but that it is not fair to the Tribe that the run was awarded 3 innings after the fact. Contrary to MLB I beleive that the score of the game is the #1 item that determines strategy. The Tribe was denied 3 innings of basing their strategy on the current situation. my thought is that the game should be continued from the point where the controversial run scored, with Baltimore leading 3 to 1. In every other instance I can recall you must apeal a decision before the next pitch. Runner leaves too early when tagging up. Appeal has to be made before next pitch. G Brett's infamouse non home run? Had to be apealed before next pitch. Same for runner missing a base. O's did not raise issue for 3 inn, but thats O

295 agree | 283 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:21 AM MST on Wed., May. 2, 2007 re: "A black eye for umps"

Jay said:
The run counted, why are you crying? The rules were followed, and the Indians are tryng to get by on a technicality, shame in them...very unsportsmanlike

384 agree | 297 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)