
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History Howard County (Map, News) - Howard County Sheriff Jim Fitzgerald charged more than $27,300 on his county credit card this past year for office expenses ranging from meals and hotel rooms to guns and uniforms.
Expenses less than $1,000 can go on the credit card, where the larger purchases go through the county’s purchasing department for approval, Fitzgerald said.
“It has to be work related or what have you,” he said.
The 2007 charges cover equipment, such as more than $7,000 in cell phone costs and hundreds of dollars to Creative Impressions for framed art for the sheriff’s office, according to credit card statements obtained by The Examiner.
Another $1,800 was spent in December 2006 for the sheriff’s swearing in reception.
For example, in April, Fitzgerald spent $1,000 at Next Day Blinds for new carpets and paint for the office, he said, which helped “make it more acceptable.”
Fitzgerald said he stays within his budget, which is approved each year by the County Council.
The sheriff is an elected position but receives county funding. The fiscal 2008 budget included $5.9 million for the sheriff’s office.
Although the sheriff is elected, each sheriff is subject to the jurisdiction’s budget controls, said Mike Canning, executive director of the Maryland Sheriff’s Association.
“The bottom line is the office of the sheriff is accountable to the county and the public,” he said.
County Executive Ken Ulman said county budget officials are discussing the expenses with the sheriff’s office.
Many charges appear to be appropriate for the office operations, but there may be a better to pay for them than on the credit card, he said.
“We will take a look at all these issues in the context of the budget and work through them [and] see if there is a better way to work through some of these expenses,” Ulman said.
“There’s a long-standing tradition in county government that constitutionally elected officers have been given some discretion in how they spend their money and get their jobs done,” he said, adding he has questions about the expenses.
The county auditor reviews each department annually, but the review of the sheriff’s office is limited to cash receipts from warrants and court orders. Other financial information would be included in the overall annual county government audit, officials said.
Some council members said all expenditures are a concern, and expenses are a part of the budget discussions.
“We all should ensure that our resources are spent wisely and responsibly,” said Councilman Calvin Ball, D-District 2, who had not seen the details of the sheriff’s expenses.
WHERE THE MONEY GOES
Some of Sheriff James Fitzgerald’s 2007 charges:
April 18 - Next Day Blinds, Maryland - $1,000
May 16 - The Gun Shop, New Jersey - $929
May 22 - The Gun Shop, New Jersey - $900
June 4 - Red the Uniform Tailor, New Jersey - $985
Aug. 18 - Micky Fins in Ocean City - $58.20
Nov. 11 - Creative Impressions art dealer, Rehoboth, Del. - $529
Source: Howard County government
smichael@baltimoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:33 AM MST on Sat., May. 17, 2008 re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
4:04 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
1:11 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
1:09 PM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
5:14 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
4:07 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
12:32 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
11:17 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
8:47 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
5:13 PM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
3:20 PM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
9:12 AM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
9:08 AM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
8:37 AM MST on Sun., May. 4, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
2:57 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
1:56 PM MST on Sat., May. 3, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
8:23 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
2:08 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
9:15 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
7:51 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
12:24 PM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:57 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
6:43 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
6:41 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
9:01 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
8:46 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:44 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
10:06 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
9:00 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
8:40 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
7:25 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
7:14 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
6:09 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
5:50 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
1:39 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
8:26 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
4:48 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
4:46 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
4:32 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
1:32 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard County scrutinizing take-home vehicle policy"
Report as inappropriate
8:31 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
8:05 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
7:21 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
7:07 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
7:04 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:57 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:50 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
6:45 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008
re: "Howard Count sheriff’s expenses top $27,000 for meals, hotel rooms, uniforms"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
Do you really expect a politician with a fake resume to crack down on ethics?
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Examiner only printed one side of the story. At least the "otherside" is being discussed through this forum. And I'm sure there are people trying to spin things to favor the Sheriff or back onto the employee. The two sides are now out there.
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Threatening...ahh I love it. Hey...doesnt the former Major's wife work for the Sheriff still? and didnt the former Major serve community service for stealing Fitzgerald's election signs? I would think if he was sucha monster...well I dont think she would work there still! move on people....
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I dont think you have to be the Sheriff or the Major to know who does their job, or doesnt, all you have to do is work there. Isnt it like that at any job? everyone knows who works and who slacks. And as far as termination...well I think if you no longer see someone at work, well its a good guess they no longer work there.... generally and I say that loosely, if someone is resigning, well they let it known. So I think people can add the facts up, without the "HR investigation"! As far as the Sheriff "allowing rumors" well...which is it folks>? is he allowing rumors? or threatening people? If he clears the rumors, then isnt he invading the "privacy policy?" and if he is threatening people, well then wouldnt they be nervous to rumor to start with? as far as terminations, well if someone was terminated unjustly...then they have recourse. Maybe this person or people you are speaking of, really deserved to be fired? WHy is it assumed the Sheriff's fault?
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I have friends like you but mine used to work for the Sheriff. It's not all peaches and cream like some make it out to be. I only know what friends have told me but there are few people on this forum who have stated that the terminations were justified (scroll down). It makes you wonder what the Sheriff is allowing to be spread throughout his office. He was supposed to bring back integrity but clearly he is allowing rumors to circulate about former employees. How is that professional? Unless it's the sheriff himself posting with anonymous usernames? You would think he would have better things to do with his time. Why would anyone else post a statement regarding the justification of the terminations? Sounds to me the Sheriff or close supporters are trying to spin this back on the employees he terminated so his actions will be forgotten. Sorry for the playing dumb statement.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I do not need to play dumb. I wasn't aware there had been any terminations until you said something. How do you know about the termination?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don't play dumb.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I was not even aware that there had been any terminations. All I was told was that people were now being held accountable and that some people did not like it. So feel free to contact HR and asked them to look into the matter. In the meantime you may as well report yourself since you have just informed the public/readers that employees have been terminated.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How would you know who is and is not doing their jobs? For someone other than the Sheriff and Major you sure do know a lot about former employees terminations which is against county policy. Perhaps I'll make a call to HR and have them look into the matter.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It means just that, not doing their jobs and not being held accountable. Employees are now being held accountable and some of them not like it. By the way, I'm not a deputy sheriff and I am a county tax payer. I have several friends, both deputies and general employees, who are thrilled to be working for someone who wants to make the Sheriff's Office a respected place to work. Not just a place to receive a taxpayer paycheck. I also think it's time for people to move on past the vehicle usage. The Sheriff adjusted his practice. That is more than can be said about the past administration.
2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
What does getting away with anything they wanted refer to? Does it mean taking a county vehicle on weekend excursions to Ocean City?
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Interesting, if all of this harassing and threatening of general emplyees is going on, why hasn't anyone stepped forward and filed a complaint with the county or state. The person can even submit it annyomously if they fear retribution. Both the state and county will not tolerate this type of conduct. There is something else to consider here, the prior administration was an absentee adminstration who did not hold their employees accountable. The current adminstration is holding people accountable and this has ruffled a few feathers. Those who were use to getting away with anything they wanted to are now being held accountable and see this as harrassment. The vast majority of the staff do their jobs and enjoy working for someone who has resinstilled pride in the organization and is holding people accountable.
2 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
James Fitzgerald is a part-time Democrat like he is a part-time resident.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Who truly runs the Howard County Sheriff's Office? Sheriff Fitzgerald or Executive Ken Ulman? Seems to me that Howard County got a two for one when they elected Ulman.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Ms. Sullivan: There is a reason why people do not post their real names when making comments. It allows for an open discussion and various view points without being intimidated or threatened. Fitzgerald has a history of threatening and harassing general employees within the office of the Sheriff; therefore, no one knows what he and his supporters are capable of outside the confines of the office. General employees have no protection unlike the deputies who are backed by the FOP so they remain silent or use means such as this forum to discuss the issues at hand.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
People like that will not put their name to anything. They like to hide so they can not be held accountable.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Helene Sullivan said:
Fear monger? liar? cheat? crook? wow. All this coming from a person who remains anonymous on a webpage. Again, I think the name callers should put their name in print.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The facts speak for themselves. You act as if Fitzgerald is entitled to the office of Sheriff. He works for the people of Howard County. We will let them decide when the time comes.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sounds like sour grapes to us! Why don't you attempt to unseat him. After you're sworn in, you can ride your own horse to work, as well as back and forth between the Dorsey Building and the Circuit Courthouse. Also, you can return all vehicles back to the county government and let them sell them all. Then, when you're all alone, because your staff has abandoned you and have been hired by the new Carroll County Police Department or Sheriff's Office (it's up to the voters which one) you have to hire unqualified deputies. Have fun with murderers attempting to escape courtrooms, walking prisoners to Baltimore City to attend court, and thankless other tasks that many in your community have any idea their Sheriff's Office does each day, because the previous administration wanted to keep the office a quiet little nook. We'll be praying for your success.
8 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Now who is feeding on emotion? Fitzgerald is more then just a public servant he is an elected official who should set the standard for people to follow. People who serve our community do not sign up for the perks. They sign up to serve their fellow citizens and their service is greatly appreciated. The fact that Fitzgerald wears a uniform with a badge does not excuse his behavior. No matter how rosey you paint the picture Fitzgerald is still a fear monger, opportunist and crook who has lied and cheated the citizens of Howard County. Enough is enough. It's about time someone called him on it.
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's time to put this to rest. Another poorly written story, working up people's emotions, because society will forever have the unfortunate system of "the haves and the have-nots." Law enforcement and fire fighting should be on the top of professions that receive more, because they deserve it. While others stand by and watch, these men and women get to it and take action, 24-7. If you want the benefits they have, then sign up. There are lots of openings and volunteers are needed at both locations. Stop sitting at your computer and writing nonsense. Help rescue someone from a burning home/vehicle and /or figure out whose breaking into people's homes.
31 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
sounds like this guy thinks he is above the law!!!!
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
starry said:
Digger. I really think there is a bigger picture here, but I got a feeling you like this crop! this is definitely YESTERDAY'S news!
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
starry said:
to respond, while the criminals continued to threaten innocent people. In fact they were all proscecuted and found guilty. The situation could have been much worse. my point is, more police on the road helping each other is always a good thing.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
starry said:
Digger. are you aware of how many of the Sgt and above within the HCPD live OUTSIDE the county? and have vehicles to use everyday, in fact do you know how much road patrol is done by the higher ranks who have cars at their disposal as well? I know for a fact the Sheriff continues to write tickets and make arrests, how often do you hear about this from the high ranking in the PD? Im also aware that all sworn men and women are able to make felony arrests outside of their county, meaning they have felony arrest powers in all maryland counties. I dont think the Sheriff is blaming anyone. Im also aware that the Sheriff witnessed an EXTREMELY dangerous road rage situtation, while driving his own car east of the bay bridge, in fact, several of the poeple in the vehicle that the sheriff assisted were carrying guns. When the sheriff called on his cell phone for assistance from the police it took the police over 15 minu
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Digger said:
Starry: The idea is to use them in their own communities and jurisdictions. Not 3 hours away in another county. Who maintains those vehicles? And I'm not talking about running it through the car wash? The county taxpayer pays for the maintenance. Tires, oil, gas, etc. Therefore, you would think a man with as much integrity as Fitzgerald would of had the common sense to use his own vehicle before he felt guilty after he was pressured by some reporter. The Sheriff only has himself to blame.
7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
As the true American Statesman once said " Can't we all just get along"? I'm not a Fitzgerald fan but the purchses went to the office and not in his pocket. He's done a good job, why all this crap? Have a nice day.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
starry said:
Take home cars for the HCPD and Sheriff's Office, the whole idea behind the cars is for the officers and deputies to use them when off duty..to increase presence of police cars. So yes, they use them to take their kids to school, go to the mall etc, and they are allowed to use them everyday as long as the vehicle is maintained. So I guess DIGGER, the entire police force is stealing! HA! since they all are using them off duty for their personal benefit......
7 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
'Digger' and the 'Examiner reader' just before that. Just like the typical How-Weird County liberals. No idea what they are talking about. Just pure brainwashed emotion.
13 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Digger said:
I'm sorry but when you use county gas and property for your own personal benefit that is stealing.
3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fitzgerald is crook. The only thing he is missing is a mask but who needs that when he can hide behind his badge.
3 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Helene Sullivan said:
and yes people are happier there. There is something to be said for that. No one is perfect, even "Dubya". I think when this issue arose, he reconsidered, and amended things. Honestly how many 'elected officials' do that without being forced to? He isnt arrogant he is a good man who worked thru the ranks to get where he is today. He doesnt steal, to steal you are breaking the law, he didnt break the law. He has done a lot of good since 1972 in this county, and I believe he continues to work hard every day to improve himself, his organization, and the professionalism of the Sheriff's Office. We are all human, we all work at it everyday. In fact we all have a name, I put mine down, why doesnt everyone else too?
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Helene Sullivan said:
digger- bathrooms are not all that "us folks" can come up with to defend Fitzgerald. I think several people have presented numerous items of the good he has done. Sheriff Fitzgerald has accomplished many great things in a year. The deputies received their 1st raise in many years, the Domestic Violence program has been strengthened, as the Sheriff continues to try to move his office to a 24 hour organization. He has promoted several well deserving people. He eliminated a wasteful, in the ballpark of 50K a year, site that wasnt necessary, and relocated staff to a county building. He has improved the weapons ( one of the "wasteful" credit charges) and improved the cell phones, ( again 'frivolous' charges), the so called 'shopping excursion' was while there for a convention , that he paid for his own lodging for at least 3 out of the 5 conventions, where patriotic art work was purchased for the corridor of the courthouse, where a refridgerator used to be located.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Digger said:
Fitzgerald is the current Sheriff not Cave. Cave's activity in the past does not excuse Fitzgerald's current misdeeds. Bathrooms? Is that all you folks can come up with to defend Fitzgerald? This reminds me of Republicans still trying to blame Clinton for everything Dubya has done. Some of you Fitzgerald supporters are the ones who are brainwashed. Secondly how can you compare Mr. Gouldin to Fitzgerald? Gouldin is not an elected official. Fitzgerald is, and should be held to a higher standard. Furthermore, does it really matter if a past employee has an ax to grind. That still does not excuse Fitzgerald stealing county property or his frivolous shopping excursions in Rehoboth. When it comes time he will have to answer to the taxpayers or will he find a way to use the county credit card to buy their vote too?
4 agree | 22 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
rob c. said:
trips? oh yeah they took trips, and rarely came into work, and allowed absence without leave for the privledged few, the list goes on and on for the past adminstration. In fact the staff wasnt even allowed to use certain bathrooms, that was reserved for the Sheriff and his "secretary"...
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Fitzgerald has greatly improved the morale and working conditions of the Sheriff's Office. Check and see how much the previous self serving, do nothing administration spent on Trips.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Arnold N. said; A typical know nothing that does not have the slightest idea what he/she is talking about. Just another brain washed person that can't stand that someone has something he/she doesn't. And anyone else that has the same opinion of take home car programs.
6 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Beth K said:
yeah...what about the Fire Dept? what is his position and how come there is no lengthy article on him? I agree with previous posts, sounds like a Sheriff bashing session to me!
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
bit said:
where did Joe Gouldin drive to? oh I guess that isnt important?
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Arnold N. said: said:
I agree with an earlier poster on here. This take home car is utter nonsense...they should cut it out all together....the county is wasting money supporting the bad habits of some of these individuals who are using these take home cars to travel to Ocean city, and who knows where else.
3 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
So Ulman will "take a look" at the policy. Great leadership. Of course, what did we expect from Glendening's Secretary of the Cabinet? Typical Ulman - reward his supporters and contributors with free cars and leases for County offices. While you are taking a look at things, why not take a look at Ulman's car and driver? But I guess Ulman deserves those perks after working so hard to make himself look qualified during the campaign. I wish he'd go back to being Director of the Board of Public Works.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Curious said:
I don't see anything typical about it.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Just another typical rabble rousing, trouble making so called reporter attempting to brain wash people with totally distorted and misleading information. Most of this information comes from a few terminated employees with an ax to grind. They were terminated for absolutely justified cause. Hey, so called reporter, the money spent at the gun shops was for ammunition. The Maryland training commission mandates twice a year qualifications.Also you rabble rouser, certain vehicles with high mileage are used by deputies to transport prisoners throughtout the state, it's called 'our job'. Also, all heads of agencies throughtout the state maintain a nice office. They represent their agencies when other heads of office and visitors meet to conduct business. As for cell phones, we updated our equipment, so did the police dept. Unlike the previous DO NOTHING sheriff's, Sheriff Fitzgerald has made vast improvements in this agency in just over a year. This, in spite of misleading reporters like
24 agree | 14 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jim said:
The Sheriff's Principle Residence is in Ocean City. That is a fact. He uses a family members address as his local Howard County domicile which allows him to meet the election requirements. His name is found on the tax assessment records as a joint tenant. It's shady and brings into question his ethics but he did nothing illegal.
8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It is personal because I'm a taxpayer just like your husband. I'm tired of politicians acting as if they can do whatever they want with our money.
3 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
People keep refering to his home in OC as his second residence. Well the MD tax records show that his home in OC is listed has his principle residence.
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ko said:
ML...also guess what! the previous Sheriff has never OWNED a home in howard county? did you know that? Sheriff Fitzgerald has owned a home in HOCO since the 70s.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ko said:
ML- he lives in ellicott city. He has a house there, he is there every single weeknite and about 1/2 his weekends. He owns a 2nd home in Ocean City, which he has since the 80s. check the public tax records. before making a statement.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
ML said:
Many of the people defending the Sheriff stating that he needs a county vehicle as a first responder on call 24/7 seem to be missing the big picture that this article suggests. I completely agree that he needs his own vehicle at the county's expense in service of this county. However, is he even truly a "resident" of Howard County since his primary residence is in Ocean City and he owns no home in Howard County? If he's a resident of Ocean City, MD how was he even able to run for office as the "Howard County" sheriff? If the taxpayers are going to pay your salary and the job calls for you to be ready to serve them 24/7 then don't you kind of need to be here 24/7. Why are we putting up with a county official of this level of responsibility for the safety and wellness of the citizens of Howard County who is basically a part-time resident?
8 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
starry said:
Bottom line. He didnt break the law. He didnt break policy. There isnt a law, or policy. HOWEVER, when the matter was brought to his attention, he improved the issue. All Maryland Sheriff's have a car to use at their discretion. To repeat--when this became a problem, he improved the issue. I think arrogant would have been "NO, Im the Sheriff and I will do what I want". that didnt happen.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree