Arthur Miller retread still a great American classic
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The Washington area is fortunate to have one of the nation’s liveliest theater communities, which makes it all the more frustrating that local companies keep repeating the same shows over and over again. Scena recently did Ionesco’s “The Chairs,” which had been revived by Round House two seasons ago. Olney is currently presenting the musical “1776,” which Keegan performed last summer.

Now, Arena Stage is doing Arthur Miller’s masterpiece, his 1949 tragedy “Death of a Salesman,” just two years after Keegan’s superlative production starring Brian Hemmingsen. The main attraction of Arena’s version is Rick Foucheux and Nancy Robinette, two of the area’s most talented actors, in the leading roles. Needless to say, they both give impeccable performances, but truth be told, Arena’s production doesn’t quite nail Miller’s script as well as Keegan’s did.

As the title reflects, “Death of a Salesman” depicts the last 24 hours in the life of failed, middle-age traveling salesman Willy Loman (Foucheux), who resides in New York with his family. Willy is a nervous breakdown waiting to happen, a man for whom the American Dream has become an unbearable nightmare. Miller never tells us what Willy sells because in essence he sells his “well liked” personality, but now he’s come to the horrible realization that there are no longer any takers.

Willy’s petty hypocrisies have also tainted his family. His long-suffering wife, Linda (Robinette), worships him, but he has a mistress (Naomi Jacobson) in Boston. His youngest son, Happy (Tim Getman), has become a caricature of his father, constantly on the lookout for vulnerable women and get-rich-quick schemes. Conversely, the older son, Biff (Jeremy S. Holm), is so determined not to follow in his father’s footsteps that he has no ambitions whatsoever.

The cast is terrific, but director Timothy Bond’s staging is heavy-handed. For example, his reimagining of Willy’s successful brother Ben (J. Fred Shiffman) as a Mephistophelean embodiment of evil is a major miscalculation. Still, if you have never seen “Salesman,” Foucheax and Robinette’s electrifying acting makes this a memorable introduction to an American classic.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

7:47 AM MST on Sun., May. 25, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Examiner Reader said:
The fact that the reviewer misspelled the title of the play doesn't change the fact that this was a difficult production to sit through. Give the director kudos for trying something different, but it really did not work.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

9:07 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Former Examiner Reader said:
My wife and I saw Cymbeline this past weekend and really enjoyed it.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

theatergoer in DC said:
Wow. I saw Cymbeline last week and wouldn't have recognized it from this review. It's always a pity when theater reviewers haven't the attention span to follow, say, theater. You know Cymbeline is Shakespeare from the start of the first act -- who else so perfectly weaves exiled lovers, mistaken identities, and of course, murder and poison -- and far from another staid production enjoyed only by closed-minded fuddy-duddies, I thought the dog and pony production took what admittedly isn't Shakespeare's best work and jazzed it up -- it was a funny and high-energy performance when I was there, and instead of spacing out at a stiff production with overdramatized lines, I was - forbid! - engaged with the storyline and the characters throughout. I hope this review doesn't keep anyone away -- it's definitely not a traditional staging of a Shakespeare play, but given the production I saw, I think that was a selling point.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:54 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, it's hard to take seriously a critic who can't even be bothered to look at his program to confirm the spelling of the title of the play. And Shakespeare, no less! No reader in their right mind should voluntarily subject themselves to such shoddy "journalism."

5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:46 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Examiner Reader said:
Wow...he mispelled it 4 times...if he can't spell, how can he be taken seriously?

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:37 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Examiner Reader said:
Wow...I haven't seen this show yet, but have serious doubts about the review when the critic cannot spell the name of the play correctly. Hey! Doug Krentzlin! The play is called Cymbeline! With an E in the middle! Let as many people post on this as possible!

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:02 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"

Examiner Reader said:
The play is actually spelled...Cymbeline...there is no A (assuming we're talking about the one Shakespeare wrote)

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.14 seconds)