
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History BALTIMORE (Map, News) - With winter over and spring about to turn into summer, the State Highway Administration has started its annual campaign to alert drivers of the effort to Keep Maryland Beautiful.
“Litter on our highways reflects badly, resulting in a bad impression of Marylanders,” SHA spokeswoman Kellie Boulware said.
“We’d like motorists to refrain from littering the roadways and wait until they reach a proper receptacle for disposing trash.”
On average, it costs SHA millions of dollars each year to dispose of litter and to pay staff to remove items tossed along the roads.
SHA maintenance crews work approximately two days a week to remove litter and it takes time from other important safety and maintenance-related duties such as pothole repair, drainage cleaning, traffic management and mowing, Boulware said.
“We have 28 maintenance facilities statewide,” Boulware said, “and one of their tasks along with traffic assistance is to mow and clean shrubbery.”
However, “recognizing that this is Earth Month, we want motorists to consider recycling throw-away-items, because that would help the environment.”
In addition, SHA encourages motorists to carry and use car litter bags.
The agency also warns that operators and owners of vehicles are responsible for any litter dropped, thrown from the vehicle or placed onto a public roadway.
Boulware said that throughout this month SHA will air a radio public service announcement featuring former Baltimore Oriole Billy Ripken, along with scheduled litter pickups by Adopt-A-Highway groups.
The agency is partnering with Royal Farms Corporation for the Sponsor-A-Highway program, which adopts 50 one-mile segments of roadway for cleanups along sections of Interstates 695, 495, 97, 95 and US 50, and MD 100.
SHA Administrator Neil Pedersen said in a statement that by partnering with the business community to reduce road litter more resources are available to protect the environment.
“Not only does it help maintain the beauty of Maryland,” Pedersen said, “but clear roads contribute to keeping roads safe for travelers, promoting tourism and supporting economic development.”
drowley@baltiomoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:00 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
10:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
How about charging these people that live on the water some more money called taxes? I cant get near the water everyday like they do and catch those crabs free because no one is watching there piers. Yea. how about charging them boat owners some more money with them polluting the water with there gas mowers. I lucky I can find a nice spot to fish and I have to pay for my licence. Charge them for the filty/dirty bay.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Whip Allan Kittleman says it will cost the rate payers more. So it might, buig deal, i'd rather pay a little more than pay huge expenses down the road to clean all the crap up thats left behing from power plants. Stuff like coal tar is nasty and i'm sure there are worse by products. Lets just ticket those littering? and if it's your responsibility to clear snow from your sidewalk in the einter, than so be it trash during the rest of the year.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A bottle bill will do nothing to fix the ignorant masses that have absolutely no qualms about littering whatsoever. One of the things that flabbergasted me when I moved here from out west in 1991 was how cavalier people are with garbage and cigarette butts. I was speaking to a lady from Ethiopia not long ago who told me that she gets embarrassed when her family visits her from there and comments about how dirty this city is. That says volumes to me. I am not always a Sheila fan, but I do respect that she is trying to address this problem.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we can pass the Bottle Bill next year so that there is a greater incentive for people to pick up litter and then the streams wouldn't look so bad...
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for raising public awareness of the problems of our streams and Patapsco River, as well as the rest of the Chesapeake Bay watershed! And thanks for getting the facts correct! Betsy McMillion, Stream Watch Director Friends of Patapsco Valley & Heritage Greenway
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A giraffe dies said:
To a large extent a part of the problem is the residents' attitude towards littering and illegal dumping. I believe there is a state law against littering with fines attached, however I do not think the police is enforcing it in Baltimore City. Not a day goes by where I don't see at least one car window roll down and a bag of fast food trash is dumped on the street or see alleys with bags of trash piled. If the city really wants to increase revenues, a law should be passed making littering a crime with a $500 penalty for each occurence. Then, instead of setting up traffic traps all over town, the police can just issue littering tickets. If the problem doesn't stop, at least Baltimore's finances will be in the positive without taxing everyone exorbitantly.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
What ever you say 10:55, You are the man!
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tammy Newcomer said:
Thanks for such a comprehensive piece on the complex issues surrounding water quality in the Bay region. The statistics at the end are particularly enlightening; Our population size has not increased as dramatically as the opulence of our lifestyles. The American Dream of a big house in the suburbs (with easy access to roads and strip malls) is having a detrimental affect on water quality and general quality of life. More and more former forests and farmlands are being paved over and as a result the waterways are being eroded and citizens are wasting more time sitting in traffic. I hope this article will serve as food for thought on changing the way we grow. We need to curtail sprawl fueled by roads like the planned ICC and instead, focus on improving pre-existing urban areas so they are safer, more attractive places to live. Urban redevelopment is an important strategy for protecting the headwater forests that protect the water quality of everyone living within our watersheds.
9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree