
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History BALTIMORE (Map, News) - The children from Pot Spring Elementary School in Timonium were eager to show Gov. Martin O’Malley the predacious diving beetle they had scooped out of the lake Tuesday at the Patuxent Wildlife Refuge.
Moments before, the children from Hebron-Harmon Elementary School in Hanover had shown the governor their terrapin.
Students from Baltimore’s Digital Harbor High were testing oxygen levels in the man-made lake, and those from Edgewood High School were mapping out biodiversity.
The elaborate show-and-tell for Earth Day was the warm-up act for a congressional hearing and the announcement of a state executive order to boost the prospects of outdoor education in Maryland and nationally.
“The environment is such a fabulous tool to get kids engaged in education,” said U.S. Rep. John Sarbanes, D-Md., sponsor of the proposed federal No Child Left Inside Act, which would create an environmental education grant program to develop and improve standards for programs linked to the outdoors.
O’Malley testified for the bill at a sunny outdoor hearing before a congressional education subcommittee at the refuge’s visitor center near Laurel.
The governor also issued an order setting up the Maryland Partnership for Children in Nature to develop and implement plans to provide youth with structured and unstructured opportunities for play, outdoor recreation and study.
Testimony at the hearing by state Schools Superintendent Nancy Grasmick made clear that Maryland is ahead of the game on environmental education. The state school board mandated such a component 18 years ago, and all 24 Maryland school systems have adopted the voluntary state curriculum.
Now “every child, every single year” is supposed to receive an outdoor Chesapeake watershed experience, Grasmick said.
She said the hands-on environmental experience has helped motivate students to pursue careers in science and technology.
O’Malley said Thornton aid to K-12 schools would be used to implement his executive order, but he hoped federal money would be forthcoming if Sarbanes’ bill passes.
William Baker, president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the proposed grant program is not a new mandate, but an encouragement.
The federal No Child Left Behind Act has fostered an emphasis on math and reading, as well as teaching to the test.
This bill is designed to “say it’s OK if you’re doing field trips,” Baker said.
llazarick@baltimoreexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:00 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
10:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
How about charging these people that live on the water some more money called taxes? I cant get near the water everyday like they do and catch those crabs free because no one is watching there piers. Yea. how about charging them boat owners some more money with them polluting the water with there gas mowers. I lucky I can find a nice spot to fish and I have to pay for my licence. Charge them for the filty/dirty bay.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Whip Allan Kittleman says it will cost the rate payers more. So it might, buig deal, i'd rather pay a little more than pay huge expenses down the road to clean all the crap up thats left behing from power plants. Stuff like coal tar is nasty and i'm sure there are worse by products. Lets just ticket those littering? and if it's your responsibility to clear snow from your sidewalk in the einter, than so be it trash during the rest of the year.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A bottle bill will do nothing to fix the ignorant masses that have absolutely no qualms about littering whatsoever. One of the things that flabbergasted me when I moved here from out west in 1991 was how cavalier people are with garbage and cigarette butts. I was speaking to a lady from Ethiopia not long ago who told me that she gets embarrassed when her family visits her from there and comments about how dirty this city is. That says volumes to me. I am not always a Sheila fan, but I do respect that she is trying to address this problem.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we can pass the Bottle Bill next year so that there is a greater incentive for people to pick up litter and then the streams wouldn't look so bad...
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for raising public awareness of the problems of our streams and Patapsco River, as well as the rest of the Chesapeake Bay watershed! And thanks for getting the facts correct! Betsy McMillion, Stream Watch Director Friends of Patapsco Valley & Heritage Greenway
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A giraffe dies said:
To a large extent a part of the problem is the residents' attitude towards littering and illegal dumping. I believe there is a state law against littering with fines attached, however I do not think the police is enforcing it in Baltimore City. Not a day goes by where I don't see at least one car window roll down and a bag of fast food trash is dumped on the street or see alleys with bags of trash piled. If the city really wants to increase revenues, a law should be passed making littering a crime with a $500 penalty for each occurence. Then, instead of setting up traffic traps all over town, the police can just issue littering tickets. If the problem doesn't stop, at least Baltimore's finances will be in the positive without taxing everyone exorbitantly.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
What ever you say 10:55, You are the man!
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tammy Newcomer said:
Thanks for such a comprehensive piece on the complex issues surrounding water quality in the Bay region. The statistics at the end are particularly enlightening; Our population size has not increased as dramatically as the opulence of our lifestyles. The American Dream of a big house in the suburbs (with easy access to roads and strip malls) is having a detrimental affect on water quality and general quality of life. More and more former forests and farmlands are being paved over and as a result the waterways are being eroded and citizens are wasting more time sitting in traffic. I hope this article will serve as food for thought on changing the way we grow. We need to curtail sprawl fueled by roads like the planned ICC and instead, focus on improving pre-existing urban areas so they are safer, more attractive places to live. Urban redevelopment is an important strategy for protecting the headwater forests that protect the water quality of everyone living within our watersheds.
9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree