Examiner.com // 16 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 38 mins ago
Examiner.com // 41 mins ago
CBS2-KCAL // 1 hr 4 mins ago
Daily News // 1 hr 16 mins ago
KTLA.com // 1 hr 33 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 36 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 52 mins ago
KTLA.com // 2 hrs 33 mins ago
ABC7.com // 2 hrs 42 mins ago
 
   
Port of Baltimore sets cargo record
Article History
There are updates to this article.

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - It was a record-setting year for the Helen Delich Bentley Port of Baltimore.

The total value of cargo moving through the Port of Baltimore reached an all-time high in 2007 as $41.9 billion in goods passed through, breaking the previous record set a year before.

Baltimore also knocked Jacksonville, Fla., out of the top slot to become the nation’s leading auto export port, and also took the top slot for sugar imports. The port ranked 12th nationally for total dollar value of cargo and rose one spot to 13th for total foreign cargo handled.

Port officials attributed the jumps to a weakened dollar boosting exports and high fuel prices giving Baltimore a geographical advantage as the closest East Coast port to the Midwest.

“We’re the further inland port, we’re able to get to our customers quicker and more efficiently and in many cases less expensively than many of our competing ports,” said port spokesman Richard Scher. “With fuel prices the way they are, a quicker, shorter drive from point A to point B is going to be valued in today’s economy.”

General cargo through the public marine terminals set a record for the sixth straight year with 8.7 million tons, up from 8.6 million tons in 2006, according to port information.

Exports overall reached 11.3 million tons last year, 35 percent higher than 2006 and the highest level since 1996. Auto exports from both private and public terminals increased 80 percent to 293,559 units from 162,784, forest products rose 33 percent to 446,447 tons, and steel saw the largest increase, up 118 percent to 117,596 tons from 53,856 tons.

The port’s increase in sugar imports may come from increases in ethanol production, said Peter Morici, a professor at the University of Maryland’s Robert H. Smith School of Business and former chief economist at the U.S. International Trade Commission. Based on corn, rising ethanol production has made corn products including corn sweetener more expensive, causing a jump in sugar imports. A weak dollar also boosts exports, he said.

“The cheap dollar against the euro has been helping American exports a lot, and it’s been helping in the auto sector,” Morici said. “You’re starting to see it pay off in Baltimore for that reason.”

acahall@baltimoreexaminer.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:55 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Baltimore port officials say second building is needed for new Carnival business"

Richard R. Ryan (Correction) said:
Re: Cruise Terminal. "The...2009 budget, which does not include an expanded or new cruise terminal." Why not? If Carnival is prepared to being significant business to Baltimore in its sailings - How about a business sense approach. Amend the budget! Allow Private enterprise to develop all the required Cruse and pier side capital improvements. If left to the procurement, and budget processes of the Maryland Port Commission, when do you think it would be incorporated into the "Budget"? Let alone, ever built. Could this also assist in Light Rail development, e.g. to and from the Cruise Terminal to the Inner Harbor and related areas? At present transportation to and from the current Terminal is lacking. Think of the tourism economic impact, many passengers elect to spend the night prior to sailing. How would other existing Cruise cities and locales address this opportunity? Again, let’s consider a private industry approach to make this opportunity a reality.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

5:17 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008 re: "Baltimore port officials say second building is needed for new Carnival business"

Richard R. Ryan said:
Re: Crusie Terminal. "The..2009 budget, which does not include an expanded or new cruise terminal." Why not? If Carnival is prepared to being significant business to Baltimore in its sailings - How about a business sense approach? Amend the budget! Allow Private enterprise to develop all the required Cruse and pierside capital improvements. If left to the procurement, and budget processes of the Maryland Port Commission, when do you think it would be incorporated into the "Budget"? Let alone, ever built? Could this also assist in Light Rail development, e.g. to and from the Cruise Terminal to the Inner Harbor and related areas? At present transportation to and from the current Terminal is lacking? Effective transfer for an influx of passangers traversing BWI to the Terminal? Let us revisit this to make it reality in very short term.

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.17 seconds)