Review: In defense of 'Caveman'
Article History
There are updates to this article.
Isaac Lamb appears in 'Defending the Caveman.'
(Courtesy photo)
Isaac Lamb appears in "Defending the Caveman."

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - “Defending the Caveman” — Rob Becker’s hit one-man comedy exploring the differences between the sexes that originated in 1991 in San Francisco — is back in The City.

Having gone on to become the longest-running solo show on Broadway, “Caveman” also has become a branded franchise. The good news is that the current version here, starring Portland, Ore.-raised actor Isaac Lamb — not Becker — is as amusing as ever.

While there’s nothing particularly earth-shattering or revelatory about Becker’s observations about men, women and men and women together, they remain funny — in part because they are so familiar, and, well, obvious.

The show, really little more than a standup comedy routine that has a particular theme and a touch of scenery (cave paintings, a seat, a TV that looks like something from “The Flintstones”), starts with a goofy video of Lamb and his wife around the house. The contrast between the pair’s ways immediately sparks audience laughter. The best montage shows the gal gleefully trying on a series of stylish outfits, clearly preparing to go out; then there’s a quick cut to the guy rummaging through the clothes hamper in search of the least-smelley item.

Lamb goes on to elucidate that the gap between the genders goes back to caveman days, when men were hunters, on a mission with a single goal, and women gatherers, receptive to assistance and information from wherever they could find it. The two are basically different cultures.

How that has played through the eons continues today, he says: How else to explain why, no matter how hard a man tries, he simply doesn’t care whether wedding invitation envelopes are cream-colored or white.

Women, he claims, aren’t hindered by logic when they argue; they’re also dependent on words in ways that men aren’t. Women typically use 7,000 words in a day, while men clock in with a mere 2,000.

For women, getting details is of prime importance, he says, but that’s not the case with men, who can have a good time and not talk about it.

In the end, Lamb’s stories are as sweet as they are sexist. When his wife laughs at him about his attempt to clean the bathroom, he quickly asks her, “Why don’t you go program the VCR?”

lkatz@examiner.com

IF YOU GO

Defending the Caveman

Where: Marines Memorial Theatre, 609 Sutter St., San Francisco

When: 8 p.m. Wednesday through Friday; 3 and 8 p.m. Saturday; 3 and 7 p.m. Sunday

Tickets: $55

Contact: (415) 771-6900 or www.ticketmaster.com


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

8:36 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "Theater: Hillbarn closes season with Elton John’s ‘Aida’"

Examiner Reader said:
I thought it was a great production and both Alexa Ortega and Adam Barry were absolutely fantastic.

9 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:07 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Review: ‘Inspector’ is sadly clueless"

Examiner Reader said:
The Government Inspector: Quite poorly done. Actors unprepared. Line delivery mishaps. Overpriced. Prop failure at the end. It reminded me of sequels such as Oceans v11 - v13, where a group of well known actors use their names to draw a crowd and sell tickets. Uk. The result is a mediocre performance, in part because of too many cooks -- and some of these cooks, e.g. Geoff Hoyle are really good. Hopefully this review will save someone else the time and money.

8 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:00 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008 re: "Review: 'High School Musical' sticks to the status quo"

Parkside Poulegene said:
Re: High School Musical I just took my daughter Sharmuta to this show and we had to leave early! When we got home I took away all her "High School Musical" CD's and tee-shirts. If she even mentions the show again she's grounded for a month, and that goes for her other mother too. This show is really racist, homophobic and pro-Zionist and pro-Bush-Terror. There's too many white people in it. This show needs to be shut down and outlawed.

8 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:40 AM MST on Sat., Oct. 6, 2007 re: "Review: 'Heartbreak' at Berkeley Rep"

Examiner Reader said:
Thank you for the first honest review that I have read on this production. The length of Act two was tortuous to sit through.

381 agree | 325 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:15 PM MST on Sun., Sep. 9, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
I bet the scene where Macbeth and Macduff are branishing their CLAYMORES is a hoot!

295 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:18 AM MST on Sat., Sep. 8, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Playing naked? Not really - the main character's body is covered by fur! As the reader before wrote the actor playing Macbeth is extremely hairy. It is quite strange to see how hairy a mans body can be... His body hair was the most impressing thing of the whole play.

320 agree | 289 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Mon., Aug. 20, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Bloody, Bold, Resolute, and Naked - AND HAIRY!!! I read an article that all actors were not allowed to shave any body hair three months before the play started to look "naturally". So it is impressive how hairy the actor playing Macbeth is - he has a furry chest and even a quite hairy back and bushy pubic hairs. It is very unusual today to see such a hairy actor fully nude, because normally an actor shaves at least his back hairs doing a nude scene on stage or in a movie... So big compliments to Daniel Eichner for presenting us his great furry body fully nude!

348 agree | 303 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:14 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Good review... one of the few critics able to articulate some of the problems with this show. I left at intermission and the lighting was troublesome. sometimes I wonder what the other critics are thinking --- if you are still curious fgo on Saturday afternoons when the tickets are "pay what you can."

382 agree | 341 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Munch claims "there is no denying" that the nudity in WSC's "Macbeth" "does little to enhance or elevate Shakespeare’s Scottish play." Well, the critics at www.PotomacStages.com and www.DCTheatreScene.com have taken the opposite view. Potomac Stages, in fact, wrote: "in no uncertain terms that this is a quality production that presents "the Scottish play" in a new and very effective light (or is that a new and very effective darkness?)." DC Theatre Scene wrote: "The actors’ nudity provides an extra dimension to their presentations...By being physically naked, these actors become emotionally naked as well. This production of Macbeth is a great gift to those who have the will to receive it. We are unlikely to see anything like it in the foreseeable future." So it seems the only thing there is no denying is that Munch doesn't speak for everyone.

399 agree | 309 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:09 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 6, 2007 re: "A ‘Macbeth’ in the Macbuff"

Examiner Reader said:
Tonight's performance of "Macbeth" started at 8:05 pm and was done precisely at 10:30. I'm not the best at math, but that seems like under 2 and half hours...not over 3 hours, which the critic claims the play to be.

387 agree | 350 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:47 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 20, 2007 re: "Eye of the beholder at the heart of ‘Fat Pig”"

JaimeK said:
Shame Fat Pig wasn't given an actual review on the acting. There were some pretty phenomenal performances. Especially Erin Riley as Helen and Courtney Ryan as Jeannie. Very VERY good show.

512 agree | 401 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:03 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 13, 2007 re: "A trifle of a ‘Tempest’"

Examiner Reader said:
Closes in 4 days

445 agree | 396 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:45 AM MST on Wed., May. 30, 2007 re: "A harrowing choice at Theater J"

Examiner Reader said:
Why review it a few days before it closes and not mention its closing in the review?

435 agree | 426 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:33 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shakespeare’s bloodiest"

EdnBetty said:
We just returned from Titus Andronicus, the play that Kenneth Tynan called "the worst play Marlowe ever wrote". We expected gore and got it! Tsoutsouvas was also great, but Valerie Leonard was vamping it over the top. And that voice set my teeth on edge!

740 agree | 476 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:27 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Reader said:
Yes, "She Stoops to Comedy" at Woolly Mammoth is a treat!

540 agree | 460 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:23 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 23, 2007 re: "Shaking up Shakespeare"

Examiner Reader said:
Oh, we just a-DORed this show!

567 agree | 452 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)