
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - “Caveat emptor.” (Latin for “Let the buyer beware.”)
Normally, the inauguration of a new theater company is cause for congratulations, but when said debut combines one of Shakespeare’s weakest scripts with an amateurish presentation like dog & pony dc’s production of “Cymbaline” does, a warning is more appropriate. This show is so infuriatingly bad that calling it a turkey would be an insult to Thanksgiving.
The plot is so convoluted that it is almost impossible to summarize it. Suffice it to say that Imogen, daughter of Cymbaline, King of Briton, defies his demands to marry her evil stepmother’s son Cloten and weds her true love, Postumus, instead. Needless to say, her father is not pleased and banishes Postumus, setting into motion a typically Shakespearean cycle of deceptions, disguises and double-crosses.
The actors involved — JJ Area, Jim Gagne, Rachel Grossman, Wendy Nogales, Becky Peters, Lorraine Ressegger and Christine Sullivan — might have talent, but it’s difficult to tell here because they’ve been hobbled by Wyckham Avery’s inept direction. Without a doubt, Avery’s most insanely self-indulgent directorial conceit is to have the actors exchange roles from scene to scene, thus rendering a story that is already difficult to follow virtually incomprehensible.
Since the actors are working without props, sets or costumes, Avery assigns each character an exaggerated pose that supposedly makes it possible to identify who they are no matter which actor is assuming the role, a hackneyed idea that quickly wears out its welcome. It also doesn’t help that the cast has been encouraged to camp up their performances in an annoyingly smarmy cartoon-like manner. (A minimalist approach to staging Shakespeare can work if everybody involved is at the top of their game, but that certainly isn’t the case here.)
Touted in their press release as “the Shakespeare story no one knows performed in a style no one has ever seen,” dog & pony dc’s “Cymbaline” is an unprofessional travesty that no one in their right mind would voluntarily subject themselves to.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
7:47 AM MST on Sun., May. 25, 2008 re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
9:07 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
1:54 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
1:46 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
1:37 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
6:02 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "‘Cymbaline’ crashes"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
The fact that the reviewer misspelled the title of the play doesn't change the fact that this was a difficult production to sit through. Give the director kudos for trying something different, but it really did not work.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Former Examiner Reader said:
My wife and I saw Cymbeline this past weekend and really enjoyed it.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
theatergoer in DC said:
Wow. I saw Cymbeline last week and wouldn't have recognized it from this review. It's always a pity when theater reviewers haven't the attention span to follow, say, theater. You know Cymbeline is Shakespeare from the start of the first act -- who else so perfectly weaves exiled lovers, mistaken identities, and of course, murder and poison -- and far from another staid production enjoyed only by closed-minded fuddy-duddies, I thought the dog and pony production took what admittedly isn't Shakespeare's best work and jazzed it up -- it was a funny and high-energy performance when I was there, and instead of spacing out at a stiff production with overdramatized lines, I was - forbid! - engaged with the storyline and the characters throughout. I hope this review doesn't keep anyone away -- it's definitely not a traditional staging of a Shakespeare play, but given the production I saw, I think that was a selling point.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Yeah, it's hard to take seriously a critic who can't even be bothered to look at his program to confirm the spelling of the title of the play. And Shakespeare, no less! No reader in their right mind should voluntarily subject themselves to such shoddy "journalism."
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wow...he mispelled it 4 times...if he can't spell, how can he be taken seriously?
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Wow...I haven't seen this show yet, but have serious doubts about the review when the critic cannot spell the name of the play correctly. Hey! Doug Krentzlin! The play is called Cymbeline! With an E in the middle! Let as many people post on this as possible!
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The play is actually spelled...Cymbeline...there is no A (assuming we're talking about the one Shakespeare wrote)
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree