
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History WASHINGTON (Map, News) - In an age when you can walk into a cafeteria and ask for the “low-carbon meal” special, eating green is no longer just the dream of hemp-wearing bohos in Northern California. It is a reality. It is mainstream. And the industry around it has gone from blooming to booming in less than 10 years.
With growth, however, comes complication. Now that climate change, water pollution and other environmental issues are all being addressed, the most eco-responsible choice is not always obvious. The apples at the farmer’s stand could be conventionally grown, while the organic Galas at the grocery store are from halfway around the world. That local farmer could be an hour’s drive out of your way. Those pesticide-free apples might come in nonrecyclable plastic packaging.
“It is confusing when these different values are in conflict,” says Michael Pollan, author of “In Defense of Food.” “It can be a real dilemma when they’re equally defensible.” What’s an Earth-loving eater to do? First and foremost, keep asking questions. Where does your food come from? How was it grown or raised? What exactly is the advantage of being grass-fed? “It’s because we stopped wanting to know these things that we can have a situation as disastrous as cows being fed to cows and causing mad cow disease,” says Joan Gussow, professor emerita of nutrition and education at Teachers College, Columbia University.
Plus, the more you know, the easier it’ll be to make the trickier judgment calls. To help you start sorting things out, here, from leading experts, are the some good food choices you can make.
BUY LOCAL
If you change only one thing about the way you shop, experts agree, hands down, you should go to the farmers market when you can. You’ll be decreasing the distance, an average 1,500 miles, that your food will have traveled to reach your plate, so fewer greenhouse gases will have been released into the air in order to feed you.
What’s more, by supporting your local farmer, you’re keeping him or her in business, which is to say you are helping farmland stay in the hands of people who are likely to use Earth-friendly, sustainable methods, Pollan says. (Nearly 300,000 mid-size farms disappeared between 1982 and 1997, about 25 percent of such farms in the country.)
BE PICKY ABOUT ORGANIC
While some foods, such as packaged organic tomatoes and refrigerated soy milk, cost only a little more than their conventionally grown counterparts (14 percent and 21 percent, respectively), the price of other organic items, such as eggs and packaged fresh spinach, can be almost triple.
“Future price changes depend on supply and demand, though prices for organic products are likely to decline as more appear in the market,” says Dr. Carolyn Dimitri, of the Economic Research Service at the U.S. Department of Agriculture. If you’re concerned about toxic pesticides and fertilizers, one way to manage the expense is to limit your organic purchases to fruits and vegetables that have the highest chemical load when conventionally grown. The dirty dozen, so called by the Environmental Working Group, a nonprofit organization (starting with the worst): peaches, apples, bell peppers, celery, nectarines, strawberries, cherries, lettuce, imported grapes, pears, spinach and potatoes. (For the complete list of produce rankings, visit foodnews.org.)
– FITNESS magazine
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
1:00 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008
re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"
Report as inappropriate
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
10:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
How about charging these people that live on the water some more money called taxes? I cant get near the water everyday like they do and catch those crabs free because no one is watching there piers. Yea. how about charging them boat owners some more money with them polluting the water with there gas mowers. I lucky I can find a nice spot to fish and I have to pay for my licence. Charge them for the filty/dirty bay.
3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Whip Allan Kittleman says it will cost the rate payers more. So it might, buig deal, i'd rather pay a little more than pay huge expenses down the road to clean all the crap up thats left behing from power plants. Stuff like coal tar is nasty and i'm sure there are worse by products. Lets just ticket those littering? and if it's your responsibility to clear snow from your sidewalk in the einter, than so be it trash during the rest of the year.
2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
A bottle bill will do nothing to fix the ignorant masses that have absolutely no qualms about littering whatsoever. One of the things that flabbergasted me when I moved here from out west in 1991 was how cavalier people are with garbage and cigarette butts. I was speaking to a lady from Ethiopia not long ago who told me that she gets embarrassed when her family visits her from there and comments about how dirty this city is. That says volumes to me. I am not always a Sheila fan, but I do respect that she is trying to address this problem.
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we can pass the Bottle Bill next year so that there is a greater incentive for people to pick up litter and then the streams wouldn't look so bad...
4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for raising public awareness of the problems of our streams and Patapsco River, as well as the rest of the Chesapeake Bay watershed! And thanks for getting the facts correct! Betsy McMillion, Stream Watch Director Friends of Patapsco Valley & Heritage Greenway
6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
A giraffe dies said:
To a large extent a part of the problem is the residents' attitude towards littering and illegal dumping. I believe there is a state law against littering with fines attached, however I do not think the police is enforcing it in Baltimore City. Not a day goes by where I don't see at least one car window roll down and a bag of fast food trash is dumped on the street or see alleys with bags of trash piled. If the city really wants to increase revenues, a law should be passed making littering a crime with a $500 penalty for each occurence. Then, instead of setting up traffic traps all over town, the police can just issue littering tickets. If the problem doesn't stop, at least Baltimore's finances will be in the positive without taxing everyone exorbitantly.
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Reader said:
What ever you say 10:55, You are the man!
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Tammy Newcomer said:
Thanks for such a comprehensive piece on the complex issues surrounding water quality in the Bay region. The statistics at the end are particularly enlightening; Our population size has not increased as dramatically as the opulence of our lifestyles. The American Dream of a big house in the suburbs (with easy access to roads and strip malls) is having a detrimental affect on water quality and general quality of life. More and more former forests and farmlands are being paved over and as a result the waterways are being eroded and citizens are wasting more time sitting in traffic. I hope this article will serve as food for thought on changing the way we grow. We need to curtail sprawl fueled by roads like the planned ICC and instead, focus on improving pre-existing urban areas so they are safer, more attractive places to live. Urban redevelopment is an important strategy for protecting the headwater forests that protect the water quality of everyone living within our watersheds.
9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree