Make it Earth Day ... every day
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - TranquiliT offers eco-friendly options — from the yoga mat to out on the town

TranquiliT was launched by Kimberly Wilson in 2002 to offer chic, versatile togs for the on-the-go yogini. Starting with staples such as wrap tops and capri pants, she quickly added trendy tunics, dresses, accessories, and skirts to wear alone or over yoga pants. TranquiliT strives to practice the yogic principle of ahimsa (non-violence) in a variety of ways in our business:

- All of our products are made of bamboo and organic cotton. Bamboo is anti-bacterial and doesn’t just wick moisture but is quick to dry. More importantly, it’s a fast-growing native species that is entirely renewable.

- All TranquiliT pieces are sweatshop free and sewn in the U.S.

- A tree is planted for every shipment that is sent out to help offset carbon emissions from the delivery process.

- We will be offering an eco “shipping package turns to tote” option at the checkout process shortly. This new mailer can be turned inside out after the shipping process to be used as a canvas tote (made of recycled content), eliminating all waste from our shipping process and allowing you to have a lovely reusable tote for all your shopping excursions.

- All other orders will be shipped via a poly-mailer, which offers the most lightweight and smallest packaging available to reduce weight and space on freighters. It also offers the most protection from damage of your goods from moisture. We are constantly in search of new 100 percent recyclable mailers. Feel free to return your poly-mailer to us, and we’ll gladly reuse it! – Kimberly Wilson

Earth-friendly wear for baby

A feature favorite of Healthy Life, bioME 5, the eco-friendly and imaginative children’s company, has released Onesies — to add to its already popular children’s T-shirt line.

The unbleached, organic-cotton Onesies feature large letters and animal graphics that portray the inhabitants of the various biomes: deserts, grasslands, aquatics, forests, etc.

Bonus good-for-the-Earth fact: Twenty percent of the proceeds for the polar bear T-shirt or Onesie will be donated to the Arctic Ring of Life at the Detroit Zoo, which is the leader in the exhibition and preservation of polar bears.

Onesies and short-sleeved T-shirts are $32; long-sleeved tees are $36. For more information or to order, visit bioME5.com. – Sara Schwartz

Paving the way for more designers to go green

The mention of eco fabrics once called to mind shapeless, unflattering garments. But growing numbers of contemporary designers are working with greener textiles, changing the very look and feel of fashion. From organic versions of old favorites to new, high-tech materials, these fabrics can change the impact our wardrobes have on the planet. – Zoe Cormier/PLENTY magazine

One company to keep an eye on: Nau. It’s design philosophy: “The balancing of beauty, performance and sustainability drives everything we do, from developing better, more environmentally friendly fabrics to raising the bar for functional, elegant designs.”

Nau offers everything from 100 percent organic grown denim jeans to recycled polyester slinky dresses. For more information or to purchase, visit nau.com.

Your new old favorite T-shirt

Bob Johnson, after 39 years in the insurance industry, decided to start his own T-shirt company. Answering the call that you can’t have enough of those soft T-shirts, The Bob Johnson Project’s 100 percent organic-cotton long-sleeve tees ($65) feature vintage black-and-red illustrations printed largely on both sides.

The tees show anything from children playing to butterflies to jockeys on their horse.

For more information or to order a tee, visit

thebobjohnsonproject.com. – Sara Schwartz


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:00 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 28, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
How about charging these people that live on the water some more money called taxes? I cant get near the water everyday like they do and catch those crabs free because no one is watching there piers. Yea. how about charging them boat owners some more money with them polluting the water with there gas mowers. I lucky I can find a nice spot to fish and I have to pay for my licence. Charge them for the filty/dirty bay.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

12:41 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
Whip Allan Kittleman says it will cost the rate payers more. So it might, buig deal, i'd rather pay a little more than pay huge expenses down the road to clean all the crap up thats left behing from power plants. Stuff like coal tar is nasty and i'm sure there are worse by products. Lets just ticket those littering? and if it's your responsibility to clear snow from your sidewalk in the einter, than so be it trash during the rest of the year.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 25, 2008 re: "O’Malley stays green, signs new measures"

Examiner Reader said:
A bottle bill will do nothing to fix the ignorant masses that have absolutely no qualms about littering whatsoever. One of the things that flabbergasted me when I moved here from out west in 1991 was how cavalier people are with garbage and cigarette butts. I was speaking to a lady from Ethiopia not long ago who told me that she gets embarrassed when her family visits her from there and comments about how dirty this city is. That says volumes to me. I am not always a Sheila fan, but I do respect that she is trying to address this problem.

2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:32 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Examiner Reader said:
Maybe we can pass the Bottle Bill next year so that there is a greater incentive for people to pick up litter and then the streams wouldn't look so bad...

4 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:29 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Examiner Reader said:
Thanks for raising public awareness of the problems of our streams and Patapsco River, as well as the rest of the Chesapeake Bay watershed! And thanks for getting the facts correct! Betsy McMillion, Stream Watch Director Friends of Patapsco Valley & Heritage Greenway

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:23 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

A giraffe dies said:
To a large extent a part of the problem is the residents' attitude towards littering and illegal dumping. I believe there is a state law against littering with fines attached, however I do not think the police is enforcing it in Baltimore City. Not a day goes by where I don't see at least one car window roll down and a bag of fast food trash is dumped on the street or see alleys with bags of trash piled. If the city really wants to increase revenues, a law should be passed making littering a crime with a $500 penalty for each occurence. Then, instead of setting up traffic traps all over town, the police can just issue littering tickets. If the problem doesn't stop, at least Baltimore's finances will be in the positive without taxing everyone exorbitantly.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:10 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Reader said:
What ever you say 10:55, You are the man!

3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:55 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Can the Chesapeake Bay survive the garbage choking Maryland's rivers?"

Tammy Newcomer said:
Thanks for such a comprehensive piece on the complex issues surrounding water quality in the Bay region. The statistics at the end are particularly enlightening; Our population size has not increased as dramatically as the opulence of our lifestyles. The American Dream of a big house in the suburbs (with easy access to roads and strip malls) is having a detrimental affect on water quality and general quality of life. More and more former forests and farmlands are being paved over and as a result the waterways are being eroded and citizens are wasting more time sitting in traffic. I hope this article will serve as food for thought on changing the way we grow. We need to curtail sprawl fueled by roads like the planned ICC and instead, focus on improving pre-existing urban areas so they are safer, more attractive places to live. Urban redevelopment is an important strategy for protecting the headwater forests that protect the water quality of everyone living within our watersheds.

9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.16 seconds)