KTLA.com // 13 mins ago
ABC7.com // 20 mins ago
KTLA.com // 27 mins ago
Examiner.com // 28 mins ago
KTLA.com // 38 mins ago
Examiner.com // 42 mins ago
KTLA.com // 47 mins ago
KTLA.com // 50 mins ago
ABC7.com // 1 hr 21 mins ago
Los Angeles Times // 1 hr 42 mins ago
 
   
Justice Department is gone, but cops still feel handcuffed
Article History
There are updates to this article.

WASHINGTON (Map, News) - A cop pal of mine is working the midnight shift downtown a few weeks ago. He’s parked in his scout car having “lunch” at 2 a.m. He hears the grind of metal on metal. He looks back to see a car dragging its hub and shooting sparks.

Many cops would have gotten back to the business of eating lunch; my guy pursued.

He tells me, “I figured the driver needed help or might be a danger to someone and shouldn’t be on the road.”

The driver wouldn’t stop. My friend followed the car all the way to the D.C. line and finally made him pull over. Turns out it was a cabby whose car was in bad need of repair. But it could have been a bad actor packing drugs and guns.

“I gave him a traffic ticket and sent him on his way,” the cop says.

His reward from the Metropolitan Police Department? Disciplinary action for pursuing a vehicle against police department policies.

This story, together with many similar accounts, leads me to wonder if our police brass and their policies are still discouraging good cops from doing their jobs. Is “depolicing” still alive and well in D.C.?

A proud D.C. police department announced this week that it had successfully brought an end to Justice Department oversight. Since 2001, the feds, through an independent monitor (private legal team paid by D.C.) have had their fingers in every aspect of local policing from use of force during arrests to citizen complaints; from training to record keeping.

In announcing the termination, Justice extended its “heartfelt congratulations” for this “outstanding achievement.”

Some history: Former Chief Charles Ramsey in 2001 invited the feds to take over what he thought was a department out of control: too quick to use force and to shoot. The consent agreement had no termination date. One of its effects was to handcuff the cops and empower the thugs. Seven years later, the oversight has ended, for the most part.

“This is a tremendous victory for the city, for Chief Cathy Lanier, for the officers,” D.C. Attorney General Peter Nickles told me. “You have the Department of Justice saying our training is a model for the nation.”

Kris Baumann, chairman of the Fraternal Order of Police, says: “Nothing has changed. The effects are still with us. If you go out and make three arrests, you might have three use of force complaints made, and you are under investigation.”

Nickles allows that the balance between cops and citizens had “tilted back the wrong way” under DOJ control, “but now we are where we should be: Police have proper respect for citizens; people have respect for police officers who confront violent crime.”

Not from what I hear. Street cops still feel that every arrest puts them in jeopardy of getting a citizen’s complaint, which leads to disciplinary action. Officers tell me that doing paperwork keeps them chained to their desks. “Armed scribes,” Baumann calls them.

Even with federal control officially over, bad guys still can use the system against good cops, and internal controls are onerous.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

5:41 PM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008 re: "D.C. GOP still dissing democracy"

Mexicans Without Borders must leave too!!!! said:
Supreme Court ruling was the correct interpretation of the Amendment. They did the right thing.

7 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

1:18 PM MST on Sun., Jun. 29, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
I totally agree. The entire nation now knows what DC has already found out! With DC not having state representation, he was the last person who should have asked the court to hear the case. It's not mayors who should thank him for his bungle. It's all govenors and state legislatures that should thank him. Mayors of cities just don't do that, particularly in DC and he was essentially reminded of that in one of the court's opinions. Again his arrogance and his "need to be" syndrome yielded yet another negative perception for our city.

2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Sat., Jun. 28, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
Everyone knew that this was a losing case given the current makeup of the Supreme Court. Despite strong advice to the contrary from the AG's Office, it was Mayor Fenty who decided to ask the Court to hear this case. It was purely a political decision on the Mayor's part, so that he could be perceived as strong on guns and he could blame the Court when the inevitable outcome would be to hold that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to bear arms. The entire Nation has Adrian Fenty to thank for this terrible ruling. Because of Fenty, City's throughout the Country will have to modify their laws. Had Fenty just listened to the advice of the experts, no one else would be dealing with the ramifications--only DC. Mayors throughout this Country should remember to thank Fenty when the repeal of own trigger lock laws result in accidental shootings of children.

4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:29 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
This column would have been more compelling if you had offered even one constructive idea for how to "make it harder for criminals to get, keep, use and reuse guns."

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:08 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Examiner Reader said:
That's such a load of malarky.

2 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:34 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 27, 2008 re: "Top court’s gun ban rejection is opportunity for D.C."

Examiner Reader said:
As a DC resident I am glad that the gun ban was struck down. The city's death rate was it's highest under the ban so I don't see how anyone can claim that it was successful. DC Gov't is going to find a way to avoid following the Supreme Court decision because they love to control and oppress their citizens and sadly a lot of the citizens prefer this "big government tactic" due to laziness and/or ignorance. And just a reminder GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE; PEOPLE KILL PEOPLE.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:09 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 26, 2008 re: "District residents are pawns in Supreme Court gun case"

Examiner Reader said:
I saw this article just today - the day that the Supreme Court struck down DC's gun law of 32 years. Just a correction....Ron Moten of the Peaceaholics was definitely there to protest the Court's interference in our laws...but also present was me, Anise Jenkins, of StandUp! for Democracy in DC Coalition (Free DC). I participated very loudly and passionately in the "face off" holding my own against those from outside of DC who had their own selfish reasons for wanting to strike down our gun laws. Let the residents of the nations' capital have some constitutioal rights...like voting for our own members of Congress since we pay the highest taxes in the nation....and controlling our own budget (statehood - is what we need)....AND the right to determine if we want guns in our community or not!!! Keep the 2nd amendment, we already decided we don't want it! Free DC! Statehood NOW!

2 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:30 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Mike Licht said:
RE: Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development -- Councilmember Brown's beefs aside, what is wrong with this picture? Neil O. Albert headed Parks and Rec when all those substandard structures were built. He is now pushing through development projects worth billions.

3 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:34 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 25, 2008 re: "Mayor’s strife with council threatens D.C. development"

Examiner Reader said:
This is a Kwame Brown set-up. The mayor is already looking to squash the next one who gets the idea of running for mayor. If he has an ounce of common sense, he realizes that he is a one term mayor. But people don't forget which council members confirmed Rhee, Reinoso and now about to confirm Nickles. Voting power is everything. "At will" employees go both ways. It goes to working folks who lost their jobs and have to support their families as well as the politicians who voted to put you in that position.

5 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:44 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
Once a crook, always a crook. Barry was the worst Mayor this City ever saw. He led the City into financial ruin and essentially bankrupted the government, while amazingly providing little to no services for citizens. Who recalls that Downtown DC was a boarded-up ghost town during his rein? Who recalls that DC owned 2 snow plows? Who brought us the lowest bond rating and a federal takeover of City finances? Who presided over more City agencies going into court-appointed receivership? All Marion Barry. I laugh today when I see him at Council hearings (he only shows for quick camera appearances) laying into City officials. The government today is monumentally more responsive and professional to citizens than during his tenure, but perhaps he was, or is, too high to remember. He is a shameful man who has brought nothing but disgrace. It's simply amazing that he has the gall to keep $1,000 from METRO above what it cost him. No doubt he'll use it for cocaine. Certainly not to pay taxe

6 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:02 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
If this piece of donkey dung is D.C.'s "strongest voice for the city’s poor and downcast", there's probably no hope for them. When you look up to a loser like Barry, you demean yourself.

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
After all the bad things you have to say about Barry, he is still one of the best mayors DC has had in a long time. He s truly about his people. And yes,he has had problems with drugs, but you find someone on capitol hill when has'nt use some type of drug, and I will show you a lier.

7 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:15 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 18, 2008 re: "Marion Barry rips off ‘The Man’ one more time"

Examiner Reader said:
After all the bad things you have to say about Barry, he is still one of the best mayors DC has had in a long time. He s truly about his people. And yes,he has had problems with drugs, but you find someone on capitol hill when has'nt use some type of drug, and I will show you a lier.

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
2:11 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 13, 2008 re: "A pair of new reports describe tale of two cities"

Examiner Reader said:
Insightful analysis of the situation in the city. Indeed, there should be millions to lift kids out of poverty. It's time we cultivated the political will to do it.

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:39 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 11, 2008 re: "Diamonds in the rough define a different DCPS"

Examiner Reader said:
Finally...someone recognizes that there is a lot of good going on in DCPS!

5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:43 AM MST on Tue., Jun. 10, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

dottie said:
The Republicans should be glad that someone wants to be a part of their party. I hope Patrick beats her bad. I will become a Republican just to get her out.

6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:02 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Republican in hiding said:
Wow! A credible Republican candidate surfaces and the GOP leadership attempts to squash him. I can finally make a selection in the GOP primary!!!

8 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:00 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Examiner Reader said:
Intimidation & strong arm tactics? Sounds like Ms. Schwartz has those big 'ol granny panties of hers in a twist. Time for a change, people. Keep at it Patrick!

6 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:41 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

What said:
What, is this a communist party? Since when does a party blackball someone that wants to run for a seat? Especially against someone who tells their staff they can't take any leave and make them cancel their travel plans, because she is running for office and she is Chair of workforce developement, what a joke!!!!!!!!!!

11 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:08 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "D.C. Republicans ‘blackball’ challenger to Schwartz"

Examiner Reader said:
Go for it, Patrick! D.C. needs you.

9 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:32 AM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008 re: "Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws"

Examiner Reader said:
Phil is right, gun laws make no difference. Many of our power focused politicians and civil servants don't get it. We must elect leaders who do get it, to reduce violent crime. Phil gets it! When informed citizens, rightly motivated elected officials, police chiefs and judges recognize that guns are not the problem, they will begin to make progress on reversing the steadily declining neighborhoods in DC and other liberal cities. The causes of voilent crimes are a lack of moral basis, the shrinking two parent family, and failure of our educational system. Church, family and schools, all failing. A gun in the hand of a moral person is just a tool for self defense or sport. In the hands of an immoral person, the gun becomes a tool for murder and other violent crime. Solution: Revival of basic morality. Understanding the difference between good and evil, right and wrong. Knowing God, and setting the goal of meeting him by living in accordance with the Ten Commandments.

7 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:37 AM MST on Thu., Jun. 5, 2008 re: "Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws"

Mike Licht said:
Re: Comrade Phil content with same-same gun laws You say >If cops stop a car and find a gun on the back seat, they can’t arrest the driver for possession because he wasn’t holding it.< I am the only one on my block who is not a lawyer, but my jury experience suggests that MPD officers need a refresher on the principle of Constructive Possession.

5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:35 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "Feds make toxic brew at Fort Reno Park"

Examiner Reader said:
Hi Mr. Jaffe I enjoy your articals in the Examiner and wanted to ask about an underground reservoir at Ft. Reno. Is it true that we collect water there as well as play and have 2-3 schools very nearby. Thanks for keeping an eye on this-Spring Valley has not gone well. JoAnn Tom

7 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:38 PM MST on Thu., May. 15, 2008 re: "What kind of green is the D.C. Council?"

Examiner Reader said:
Good thing the council did. The toxicity comes in the aftermath, with people opposing the road getting called all manner of things from treehugger to nasty neighborhood activist. And worse. There are too many roads in RCP.

8 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:37 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "The mayor, the policeman, the aftermath of a shooting"

Dear Mr. Fenty said:
Working for the citizens means doing what is best for all citizens. Making assumtions about a police officer's actions before an investigation is conducted and using our money to pay for an attempted murderer's funeral are contrary to "working for the citizens" and, I pray you will find on your next re-election campaign, is also contrary to working for the mayor, which is obviously your true agenda.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:29 AM MST on Fri., May. 9, 2008 re: "The mayor, the policeman, the aftermath of a shooting"

Examiner Reader said:
This mayor needs to resign. I think what he did was wrong under any circumstances but to take the stand he did, before the investigation was even completed, is unconscionable. Now he is not even man enough to apologize after an independent agency cleared the officers. I hope the FOP does everything in its power to make sure he is not re-elected.

12 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:04 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

MPD Supporter said:
Haskel and Clay.... WE, your brothers and sisters IN LAW, are with you, behind you, beside you, every step of the way! WE applaude your patience with letting this rediculous investigation run it's course. Only a truly riteous person could have risen above all of it. WE are proud to see that despite all the lies, rumors and hateful statements that have been made about you, you have managed to maintained your professionalism and handle the hard times with dignity. They are not over yet, but the day will come when they will be. Until then, be strong and KNOW that we are going through this WITH you! Much Love brothers, MUCH LOVE!

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:51 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Officer James Haskel tells his side of story"

DC Resident said:
Officer Haskel, thank you for your service to the city. I am sorry this happened to you. You did what you had to do in the situation, and there are many people who support you completely and feel appreciative of your service as a police officer.

8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:37 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008 re: "Klingle Road heads back toward nature"

Examiner Reader said:
I hope it's over, but fear it's not. Someone on the CC has brought the matter (Klingle) back up, or is trying to. I wish we'd nail that coffin shut, once and for all. I am not "elite," but I want that road shut down.

12 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:45 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

The Truth said:
This article is, as every piece of cowardly puppet journalism in DC, completely false in it's attempt to paint OPC in the same light as a Ukranian prison camp. The author is simply another hired bitch of the police department tasked with defending their every move (no matter how corrupt). The DC police are far from the heroic public servants he would have you believe and, in fact have still not managed to get this country's capital city under control. It's better off than it was 20 years ago, but for god's sake it's the CAPITAL of our ENTIRE NATION and the police cannot stop one single crime spree!!!! Perhaps instead of this shameful article, the author should try his hand at some legitamite reporting....but that just wouldn't be his style now would it.

11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:38 PM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

DC Lawyer said:
Gee, I wonder if "CommonSenseDC" works for the office of police complaints. No one in their right mind would attest to the truth and accuracy of something they did not write and were not given an opportunity to correct or amend. The police are not trying to be above the law. They want the same rights as our society gives to everyone else. By the way, who really files these complaints? Ordinary citizens? I don't think so. It's the thugs who know they can use this OPC procedure to retaliate against good cops. The system needs fixing. Thank you Mr. Jaffe for shedding some light on the subject.

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:14 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

CommonSenseDC said:
I hear that both citizens and the police have to provide signed, written statements to the Office of Police Complaints, attesting to the truth and accuracy of their accounts. If a cop is unwilling to attest to that, then maybe the officer is trying to cover something up. The old blue wall of silence. I don't think the police should be above the law. Gulag, Schmoo-lag.

14 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:24 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

DC Lawyer said:
How is the Office of Police Complaints investigation procedure possibly legal? Sounds to me that it is not, and I wonder why the D.C. Council is allowing these kinds of investigations to occur. Also, why is the police department allowing its officers to be subjected to this kind of questioning and forced signature of statements? Shouldn't someone be stepping in to prevent this??

11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:28 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Welcome to Gulag D.C."

Northwest DC said:
No wonder the crime problem in D.C. is escalating, when the city treats its cops so poorly.

15 agree | 16 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:23 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
Why didn't Rhee say she would fight for a good PUBLIC SCHOOL? EXACTLY Let's talk about improve curriculum and standards --- EXACTLY But my thinking is, that was never part of the equation. The problem always was how to privatize the public school system? Harry Jaffe, Marc Fischer never talked about the nuts and bolts of improving ANYthing. It was always wholesale change, bust those damn unions at any price. They've done it now. Now, what?

19 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:34 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
What is wrong with this picture? Anyone of us could select a private company to run the schools based off of internet research. Rhee hasn't done anything significant since her appointment. All of these "ideas" she's touting were proposed long before her arrival. Janey produced a wonderful Master Education Plan and said it wouldn't overhaul the system overnight...he got canned. Rhee says the same thing and she's labeled an innovator. Please! You people who keep singing her praises please tell me what has she done to improve the system. And please, don't give me rhetoric about the firings...that was easy. Let's talk about improve curriculum and standards. Let's not talk about closings nor restructuring as that was mandated by NCLB not Rhee. Janey, too, had proposed closings just on a well thougth out schedule that would save the city $$$$. I could've selected these private partners and saved the city $20million in new salaries for Rheinoso and Rhee's "expert" staffs.

16 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:26 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
The Examiner needs to do research!!! Charter schools F - Why didn't Rhee say she would fight for a good PUBLIC SCHOOL? Parents - citizens - educators -Know- its not about education its about money $$$ There is money to be made and a great tax write off in charter schools- Rhee, if allowed will make her friends rich! Its not about the children!! Research every charter school in the city- look at the money - the people - follow the money!! The City Council made the biggest set of mistakes - 1.Fenty taking over schools 2.appointing Rhee. - I ask- Do we have the least qualified group of school leaders in this country?? City Council reverse the curse!!!!!When will it really be about children and education- When will the City Council put "REAL" money in the Public Schools? With correct funding to provide the best programs and resources for success!! PULIC SCHOOLS WITH A PUBLIC AGENDA!!!

19 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
5:36 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 24, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
This seems to be the trend in this country -- exactly right. But it is the trend mostly in cities that have a weak municipal structure, such as the District's which is built-in. And such as New Orlean's. The private contractors took advantage of the devastation in the late summer of 2005 in NOLA to swoop in and privatize the hell out of the place. Cities and suburbs that are stronger and richer have less privatization.

12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
8:25 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
You're right if it is in fact all "about educating our children." In the same respect, it is also about strengthening public education as a platform for providing quality education for those who believe in public education as a viable option. For some, public education is the only option. Rhee was hired to fix the public schools in the District. Her primary focus should be on that and not outsourcing or contracting out her responsibilities to further weaken public education in this city. This seems to be the trend in this country, don't spend the time and effort to fix it...give it away to an entity to make money off of it. Public education in this city has systematically been destroyed by those who seek to cripple the potential of young African-American youth in urban areas like the District of Columbia. While there are a few good charter schools in the city, many of the others are no better than some of the neighbor public schools. Don't believe the hype.

15 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
6:37 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008 re: "Charter school movement wins the education war in District"

Examiner Reader said:
Do you call winning 5 out of 71 charters schools making AYP? They are winning at making the parents feel good, but the academic facts they me they are not meeting the standards on a large scale. It is not a competition if everyone doesn't play by the same rules. Stop trying to dupe people and give them the facts. Check out the DCPS website for the results listed. If public schools are only judged on the "test" so should the charters or ther should be no comparison at all.

15 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:20 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008 re: "Fighting words at Wilson High: Is it racism or just reality?"

Examiner Reader said:
Wilson has had Oak Hill students for years. And yes, on paper Wilson is highly diverse, but walk around to see the classes and you will see segregation hard at work. Wilson has had its share of problems and violence for years. The former principal was just better able to keep it out of the news. The school is a sinking ship!

8 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
12:02 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 18, 2008 re: "Justice Department is gone, but cops still feel handcuffed"

DC resident said:
Why does the police department discipline its officers so frequently? As a D.C. resident, I would like to think the department would encourage police work instead of creating disincentives to fight crime.

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
4:52 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 16, 2008 re: "Free D.C. — from taxes"

DC Voter said:
The idea I have been developing, is to suspend the federal tax for DC residents, and have a relatively flat tax of, say 17%, with the first $20,000 or $30,000 exempted (whatever works to make it fair for the working poor, but simple for everyone else). The raise in local taxes from approx. 10% would bring revenues in to cover motorcades and other federal tasks.

11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:32 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 12, 2008 re: "‘Shameful’ profiteering over four dead sisters"

DC Citizen said:
This is one time I agree with Peter Nickles, where were the Family members when the children needed them? I know dodging their responsibility. Now that the free cash cow DC Goverment some how is implicated, just grab a ambulance chaser(lawyer)and hopefully get a wind fall. What that family member really need is a back room beat down with hospitalization to follow.

14 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:46 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008 re: "‘Shameful’ profiteering over four dead sisters"

Examiner Reader said:
Is it really a generalization? Most abandoned children are in the familes of minorites? I don't think that is what was being stated anyway. The poster was simply stating the truth. If you can't handle don't label it as racist, because that makes you look like a racist Troy. And someone who is in denial.

11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree