California News

Examiner.com - 1 hr ago
Los Angeles Times - 1 hr 26 mins ago
Daily News - 1 hr 33 mins ago

Tribune may sell assets

Apr 18, 2008 12:00 AM (133 days ago) by G.M. Corrigan, The Examiner
This story ranks Not ranked
Related Topics: BALTIMORE

BALTIMORE (Map, News) - In a conference call that included more than 350 participants Thursday, top executives at the Tribune Co. — including Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Sam Zell — admitted that revenues for the new, employee-owned company had been lower than expected and that a “divestiture” of some core assets was now under serious consideration.

Zell insisted, however, that anticipated income nevertheless would be sufficient to meet the merger’s credit obligations due this year.

“Revenue trends are significantly worse than expected,” Zell updated his audience, noting that the “flight of advertisers” to the Internet continues while company broadcasting revenue is ahead of 2007 numbers. “A great deal of this has to do with erosion of the classified side of the newspaper print business,” Zell said. “We’re expecting a double-digit decline in print advertising this quarter.”

Classified advertising makes up 33 percent of the Tribune Company’s total advertising revenue.

This story continues below
Advertisement

“A significant erosion in the first quarter has certainly put our plans into some question,” Zell said, “and we are forced to consider the possible divestiture of some of our assets.”

Zell made no mention of The Sun, which a group of local investors wants to buy, as a candidate for sale, but said he was in discussion with several parties interested in buying the company’s Newsday property on Long Island.

Reviewing disappointing 2007 financials released earlier this year while noting that first-quarter 2008 numbers would not be released until May, Zell stressed his optimism about the company’s prospects, adding that the organization is determined to retool from a stodgy, top-down conglomerate to a vibrant, employee-empowered, incentive-based, synergistic company.

“We have a positive employee base determined to take the company to a new level,” Zell said, stating that he personally had read and  answered more than 3,000 e-mail suggestions sent to him from employees.

Randy Michaels, Zell’s head of broadcasting and interactive services, also reported positive initial results in remaking the company’s culture into that of a 21st-century media entity.

Add a Comment


Name: (required)
Comments:
characters left
Comments are regulated by the Terms of Use.

Comments from Examiner Readers

4:41 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 16, 2008 re: "Sun layoffs loom as buyout response lags cut-back minimum"

The Corrector said:
They publish two daily newspapers - The Sun and b.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

6:36 PM MST on Fri., Jul. 4, 2008 re: "Newspaper Guild assents to The Sun’s buyout terms"

Examiner Reader said:
I am certain that if The Sun had not succumb to being a liberal rag it would still be flourishing. As a conservative, I subscribe to The Sun but only do so out of habit and because I like to know what the enemy is espousing.

1 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:12 AM MST on Wed., Jul. 2, 2008 re: "Newspaper Guild assents to The Sun’s buyout terms"

Examiner Reader said:
Wow! Mr. Corrigan finally wrote an article about something other than nonprofits. He didn't write it well, but at least it was about something else. For example, when the labor unit goes from 500 to 400, we don't need an explanation that 45 were last year and 45 were this year. Also note that 45 + 45 does not equal 100.

9 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:01 PM MST on Mon., Mar. 24, 2008 re: "Sun owner reviewing ‘core assets’ as Tribune Co. reports bleak earnings"

Hollow Man said:
What "core assets"? A newspaper that is losing circulation and is sooo 1980's it's no wonder nobody reads it. News is on the web, baby. Print media is a quaint hold over from a time now past. The Sun is setting into irrelevancy and good riddance.

3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
11:13 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 6, 2008 re: "Purchase of Sun plant could pave way for redevelopment"

BA said:
Why not redevelop an already residentially aimed area? Traffic will only get ten times worse at that bottle neck on Hanover Street, which it and 95 would be the only entrance and exit to that area.

31 agree | 38 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Advertisement