Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Prosecutors opened the racketeering case against Deborah Palfrey last week, calling the witness stand “the hottest seat in D.C. this summer.”
But except for the 13 escorts — including a Naval Academy officer, a 63-year-old professor and a suburban mother — and three male clients, the temperatures caused few to sweat in the public.
Vitter, R-La., along with former Deputy Secretary of State Randall Tobias and military strategist Harlan Ullman, were listed as possible witnesses but were never called.
Defense attorney Preston Burton closed his final statements by pointing out that after a five-year federal investigation, prosecutors only called 10 percent of the service’s more than 130 escorts. Less than a fraction of 1 percent of the thousands of clients admitted to having sex for money. And none of the witnesses said Palfrey told them to have sex, he said.
Palfrey’s business offered men an erotic-fantasy service, not prostitution, Burton said, comparing Palfrey to a taxi dispatcher who scheduled appointments. Palfrey did not know the escorts were having sex for money, he said.
“Don’t penalize [Palfrey] for the route the cab driver took,” Burton said.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Dan Butler said Palfrey chose her words carefully, using code while she talked to her escorts to avoid prosecution.
“It was a pretty clever system,” Butler said. “It would give her plausible deniability.”
But Palfrey slipped several times when she warned the clients in newsletters to beware of law enforcement officials, especially in Alexandria, and telling the women that they were paid by the “activity” not for the 90 minutes, he said. Men do not pay $250 for 90 minutes of casual conversation, Butler said.
“It’s not rocket science,” Butler said. “There’s no question prostitution was going on here.”
The case is now in the hands of a jury that deliberated until Monday afternoon. Palfrey faces four counts, including racketeering, money laundering and using the U.S. mail for illegal purposes.
smccabe@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
7:54 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "‘D.C. Madam’ notes say suicide was only way out"
Report as inappropriate
2:41 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008
re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"
Report as inappropriate
2:02 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
1:00 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"
Report as inappropriate
5:01 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "‘D.C. Madam’ allegedly dies by suicide in Fla."
Report as inappropriate
1:47 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
10:41 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Naval officer faces dismissal after testifying in madam trial"
Report as inappropriate
9:16 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
Brenda from England said:
The US Government psychologically tortured Deborah Jeane Palfrey to the point of suicide, (in other words to the point of murder). From an international human rights point of view she was totally innocent. Why did the US Government do such a thing to her? So they could steal her assets and life savings and claim everything was done legally. Deborah worked hard for her money, she was an intelligent, successful and hard working business woman. In her 52 years of existence she never hurt one soul, she was a sweet and beautiful person. Every single government official involved with her case (or torture) have her blood on their hands. The US government basically murdered her just so they could steal her money. Only a very cruel government could do such a thing. (Deborah - I as a fellow human being love and respect you with all my heart, I know you were innocent just like Jesus was innocent of all charges brought upon him before he was crucified - God bless your soul).
1 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Palfrey was a woman who made selfish choices til the end.She profited from a business which hurt innocent women(wives)and children via their louse husbands/fathers.How many wives have been devastated... caught STDs? How many children have been scared and confused by marital discord/divorce? Her note was remorseless and all about her..."I can't be incarcerated...I'll be in my late 50's...penniless...I was the victim of a public lynching..."I,I,I".She even hung herself on her mother's property:SELFISH! She chose illegal activity and devalued marriage that is why she was enroute to prison and "alone". The former escort who commented contradicts herself by stating that she hadn't been proud of that time in her life,but goes on to justify it because it is between consenting adults,she needed money etc.Some serious soul searching may be beneficial.She would probably never assault an unsuspecting mother and child.But in a sense,she has done just that.
1 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's sad for anyone to end their life in such a manner. As for the so called western culture, sex outside of marriage is an abonination to God. Have you not heard that the wages of sin is death!
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
She did what she thought was best at the day and time.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
reader said:
She didn't have a choice .
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am one of Palfrey's former escorts. I did not testify in the hearings though. That period of my life is one I'm not proud of, but it got me through some pretty rough financial times. Personally I don't get why it's illegal. It was concentual and safe, and "Julia" (aka Deborah) took good care of us. I worked there 6 weeks and made well over $10,000. Paul Huang, mentioned in this article, was one of my most frequent clients. In fact he was one of two who knew my real name.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
She made a choice. Now she has defined herself.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sorry icant understand this western hypocrisy!If having sex is not outlawed then money mustnt be the question ?I know you cant concieve this either!What about single mothers and guy hords?Iassume the western values are decaying and you wont accept !!
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree