A bowl soars in the Richmond
Article History
There are updates to this article.
San Francisco-based architect Stanley Saitowitz designed the distinctive new building for Congregation Beth Sholom in the Richmond district.
(Courtesy photo)
San Francisco-based architect Stanley Saitowitz designed the distinctive new building for Congregation Beth Sholom in the Richmond district.

SAN FRANCISCO (Map, News) - Sidewalk supervisors in San Francisco’s Richmond district have been keeping an eye on what's happening at Clement Street and 14th Avenue. First, the Beth Sholom temple complex was demolished, then some strange structures were raised and concrete poured in huge quantities. Now there stands one of The City's most interesting new buildings; Congregation Beth Sholom will open it next month. 

The eye-catcher is the sanctuary, a gigantic bowl outside, an amazing space for 700 worshippers inside. It is the work of Stanley Saitowitz, principal of San Francisco's Natoma Architects.

He speaks of the design reflecting Beth Sholom's nature as a conservative congregation, the structure inspired by the ancient temple at Israel's fabled Masada fortress.

Traditionally, Saitowitz says, tabernacles were centrally organized, the congregation sitting around the rabbi. Then, in the early 20th century, the space became "more frontal and performance-oriented." The Beth Sholom sanctuary design, being “communal, with no separation,” goes back to earlier times.

Beth Sholom Rabbi Micah Hyman points out that the conservative, not orthodox, congregation, continues the temple's tradition of families worshipping together.

"As the rabbi," he says, "I am so inspired to work in a space that has no bimah [a platform or altar]. It reflects a spiritual aspiration... as a whole, the facility allows smooth flow from social to spiritual space while integrating different populations of age and interest."

Saitowitz had only 15,000 square feet to work with for the entire project, but he has managed to build a continuous series of courtyards he calls "quiet space embedded in the middle of a noisy city."

There are entrances to the sanctuary and Koret Hall — the main building, facing Clement Street — which houses a library, youth lounge, board room, meeting rooms and room for meditation, yoga, study and other spiritually-oriented practices.

The unusual shape of the sanctuary's bowl reminds one of another startling new structure in The City, Daniel Libeskind's Contemporary Jewish Museum, which looks like a cube sitting on its corner.

Unlike that steel complex, the Beth Sholom bowl is made of concrete, poured in place, regarded by Saitowitz as a "technically challenging, but excellent material that allows plasticity." The outer surface of the sanctuary is reminiscent of the 2-millennium-old Western (or Wailing) Wall in Jerusalem.

Another challenge to the architect is the Jewish proscription against iconography or ornamentation of any kind. Saitowitz's solution is decorating with natural light by building skylights. He says, "On the eastern wall, the window turns into the eternal light above the Ark; a shadow menorah cast from the six beams that support the roof animates the wall, changing as the sun moves through the day."

Saitowitz, who has practiced in The City for more than 30 years and also taught at University of California, Berkeley, has other projects around the country, including another temple, Beth El in La Jolla, and the new Tampa Museum of Art in Florida. Locally, he has built some three dozen projects in the past decade.

There is another Beth Sholom Synagogue of architectural interest: it is in a Philadelphia suburb, built in 1959, the last work by Frank Lloyd Wright, who died just before the completion of the temple.


Name
Comments

characters left


Comments from Examiner Readers

1:14 PM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Parking officers prepare to deal with rising tide of anger"

Examiner Reader said:
People should leave the parking officers alone and assault city hall. The mayor and the planning department keep approving more and more development without adequate parking in a city with very limited parking as it is. People aren't likely to get out of their cars and use transit for their needs until the transit performs at an acceptable level. I don't believe anyone can honestly claim SFMTA operations in SF are acceptable.

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree

8:12 AM MST on Thu., May. 29, 2008 re: "Parking officers prepare to deal with rising tide of anger"

bee said:
There is no excuse for assaulting a parking officer. There is also no excuse for the rudeness of some parking officers, nor their double parking and blocking traffic with impugnity. Just the other day I saw three parking "officers" taking a break together in a North Beach bakery... Also, why are they called "officers" now that they are no longer under the Police department?

Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
9:32 AM MST on Thu., May. 1, 2008 re: "Asketh The City: ‘Where art thou, Shakespeare plaques?'"

Examiner Reader said:
this article was a exsotic amazement someone so selfish would take away the only wonderful time being art of william shakespeare he is a amazing designer and who ever shou take the art of an amazing person has a holed heart

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
7:21 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 30, 2008 re: "Cost of home-improvement permits to soar"

Dadee said:
They should reduce the number of employees. Most of them are incompetent and make it more difficult and expensive to get the project done.

1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
10:43 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 29, 2008 re: "Skies darken for solar rebate plan"

Examiner Reader said:
That sucking sound we here is the Mayor playing to his friends and collegues at LENNAR CORP with the solar offer. The same people who are going to rebuild the Bayview for no cost to taxpayers. Really?

0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:39 PM MST on Sat., Apr. 5, 2008 re: "Skies darken for solar rebate plan"

Eric Brooks - SF Green Party said:
One very important fact that your report fails to note, is that the Mayor's solar plan lets the SFPUC wave caps and allow an unlimited public subsidy to private corporations for building solar on their property. So under the Mayor's plan, if Lennar Corporation builds us a new stadium, it could also deck out that stadium with millions of dollars of solar panels and stick San Franciscans for the bill! Let's make sure that public money goes to public solar, not private corporations. We should scrap the Mayor's plan.

3 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
1:08 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 4, 2008 re: "Skies darken for solar rebate plan"

Examiner Reader said:
The city should not pay for these small, inefficient, expensive residential installations. They are poorly monitored and maintained, the actual output is unknown, it's like buying a pig in a poke. If the SFPUC can convince a private company to operate a large installation at Pier 96 and sell the electricity back to the city at a guaranteed reasonable rate, that would be a better deal. However, it's questionable whether or not the SFPUC can make such a deal.

3 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
3:04 PM MST on Thu., Apr. 3, 2008 re: "Skies darken for solar rebate plan"

Examiner Reader said:
Let me see, the supes find time to debate and pass a pointless bill on China, but didn't have time to look at and pass a useful bill actually pertaining to San Francisco.

1 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
 
 

(page generated in 0.11 seconds)