
We will consider publishing letters containing fewer than 150 words.
Submit your letter to the editor
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Re: “Don't throw good mortgage money after bad,” editorial, April 7
In principle, I am opposed to bailing out market participants who brought grief down on their own heads, but the illiquidity of the mortgage markets is causing a lot of economic damage. I would leave them all out to hang if their pain didn't translate into even more pain for the rest of us.
Recently, we saw mortgage rates rise as the Fed cut its rates due to Bear Stearns' near collapse. While I think House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank's approach is ill-advised, there are a lot of things we can (and should) do to prevent spillover from the subprime mess.
Some places have guaranteed (and paid the interest on) 10 to 20 percent of qualifying mortgages if the lender would mark them down to fair market value, in which case the mortgagor must share 10 to 20 percent of any gain. These would be for owner-occupied homes where the owner could afford to make the payments on the remaining mortgage.
Lenders can either cut their losses and sign up or they can subject themselves to the tender mercies of the free market they cherish so much — until it moves against them and they find themselves asking for bailouts at the taxpayer's expense.
As a deficit watcher, I am apoplectic about the four-year tax carry-back. I wonder how many lobbyists it took to screw in that particular lightbulb.
Transgender bill puts women, children at risk
Re: "Council member says she's getting death threats over legislation," April 3
Since last November, Montgomery (County) Councilwoman Duchy Trachtenberg has been claiming she's received death threats over her sponsorship of the transgender rights bill. You'd think that charges against the perpetrators would have been filed by now.
The rub is that Mrs. Trachtenberg would deny security for the women and girls of Montgomery County, whose safety may well be jeopardized once her bill takes effect. The bill gives a man the legal status of a woman if he perceives himself as such. In the “old” days, such an individual would have had to undergo sex change surgery. Now, perception is reality.
Although the bill's proponents dispute this, men who “feel” they are women most probably will gain legal entrance to female restrooms, locker rooms and shower rooms at community swimming pools, private health clubs and other public accommodations. Given the vague definition of what constitutes a transgender, is it much of a leap to imagine that voyeurs and pedophiles will be first in line to take advantage of this “non-discrimination” bill?
Mrs. Trachtenberg has repeatedly addressed this concern by telling her constituents that there are laws against peeping Toms and pedophiles. But as any victim of a crime knows, laws don't protect — they only punish.
The bill is up for referendum next November because over 30,000 voters, who understand its potential harm more fully than the councilwoman does, have signed a petition to put it on the ballot.
Derwood
Clinton’s dirty fight hits Obama below the belt
Re: “Is Hillary Clinton like Rocky on race?” April 3
Chris Stirewalt is correct when he says that Hillary Clinton pretends to be Rocky when she admits that she “is in this race to the bitter end,” but does not discuss how she has been berating and persecuting Barack Obama, and condemning him for the things the Rev. Jeremiah Wright said about America just before he retired from the pulpit.
Clinton has also been claiming that Sen. Obama cannot win so that she can get more superdelegates on her side. Using these dirty tactics just to win an election should leave a very bitter taste in the mouth of every member of the Democratic Party.
I hope the people of Pennsylvania will see this for what it is and vote with their conscience for either Obama or John McCain.
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY
Comments from Examiner Readers
3:18 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008 re: "Letters: July 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:25 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:14 PM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:41 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: July 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:50 AM MST on Mon., Jul. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: July 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:44 AM MST on Tue., Jul. 1, 2008
re: "Letters: July 1, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:48 PM MST on Tue., Jun. 24, 2008
re: "Letters: June 24, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:37 PM MST on Thu., Jun. 19, 2008
re: "Letters: June 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:48 PM MST on Sat., Jun. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: May 30, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Fri., Jun. 6, 2008
re: "Letters: June 6, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:11 PM MST on Tue., May. 27, 2008
re: "Letters: May 27, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Thu., May. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: May 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:43 PM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: May 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:27 AM MST on Thu., May. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: May 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:53 AM MST on Tue., May. 6, 2008
re: "Letters: May 6, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:28 PM MST on Mon., May. 5, 2008
re: "Letters: May 5, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:33 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Letters: May 2, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:20 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: April 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: April 22, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:41 PM MST on Mon., Apr. 21, 2008
re: "Letters: April 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:54 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 17, 2008
re: "Letters: April 17, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
1:05 PM MST on Tue., Apr. 15, 2008
re: "Letters: April 15, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:17 PM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Letters: April 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
8:15 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Letters: April 10, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:06 AM MST on Wed., Apr. 9, 2008
re: "Letters: April 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:56 AM MST on Tue., Apr. 8, 2008
re: "Letters: April 8, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:46 AM MST on Mon., Apr. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: April 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:56 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 31, 2008
re: "Letters: March 31, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
4:50 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 24, 2008
re: "Letters: March 24, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:12 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 21, 2008
re: "Letters: March 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:58 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:54 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 18, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:34 AM MST on Tue., Mar. 18, 2008
re: "Letters: March 13, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:53 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 17, 2008
re: "Letters: March 17, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:16 PM MST on Sat., Mar. 15, 2008
re: "Letters: March 13, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
2:07 PM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: March 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:43 AM MST on Fri., Mar. 7, 2008
re: "Letters: March 7, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
12:07 PM MST on Wed., Mar. 5, 2008
re: "Letters: March 5, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:02 AM MST on Mon., Mar. 3, 2008
re: "Letters: March 3, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
11:48 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 28, 2008
re: "Letters: February 28, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
7:51 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 27, 2008
re: "Letters: February 27, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
7:29 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 27, 2008
re: "Letters: February 26, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
10:24 AM MST on Fri., Feb. 22, 2008
re: "Letters: February 21, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
5:38 AM MST on Thu., Feb. 21, 2008
re: "Letters: January 17, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
3:42 PM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008
re: "Letters: February 20, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:52 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 20, 2008
re: "Letters: February 20, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
6:39 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 12, 2008
re: "Letters: February 12, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
9:05 AM MST on Tue., Feb. 5, 2008
re: "Letters: February 5, 2008"
Report as inappropriate
Examiner Reader said:
I wonder if any of Mr. Tunes clients have read his letter? If so, they should take another look at their last tax return!!
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
The Examiner Reader defending the South Dakota law designed in inhibit free choice on abortion obviously knows little about neurobiology, law, or the Bible. As neurobiology shows, the most important component of human personhood is consciousness, and brain development does not allow that until some time after 28-32 weeks. As for the Judeo-Christian scriptures, they use the word "nefesh" for person and that refers to something that breathes, in other words, that is born. South Dakota's law is simply another attempt to gum up a woman's constitutional right to follow her own conscience.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
Lawrence Marsh (letter, July 8) is wrong in assuming that the US Constitution's religious freedom guarantees give government (i.e., the US Navy) authority to impose one-size-fits-all religious devotions on military cadets. In doing so the Naval Academy is running afoul of the First Amendment's establishment clause. Flaunting the Constitution is not showing a good example to future officers. The Navy should cease and desist.
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's wrong to describe South Dakota's law as anti-choice. It merely assures that women follow informed consent and that they know all aspects of what they choose to do. Mr. Doerr's definitions of "personhood" are nothing short of bizarre, as are his references to various Constitutional amendments. Liberals apparently believe that nothing exists until at least 28 weeks of gestation. In the vast majority of cases, once conceived, a human baby, if not aborted, develops systematically. It is folly to argue that until a baby can survive outside the womb, "personhood" does not exist. What are liberals afraid of, that if women understand all aspects of what they are considering, they will choose not to have abortions, and that industry will die?
0 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr, President, Americans for Religious Libe said:
Two letters on July 3 seeking to discredit evolution missed their target completely. So-called "Intelligent Design" creationism has no cradibility whatever in the science community and was found by a federal court in Pennsylvania to be thinly disguised religion and therefore unconstitutional in public schools. As for so-called "missing links", that term was obsolete generations ago as Mendelian genetics and now molecular biology have filled in the gaps that Darwin missed 150 years ago. Natural selection evolution is the only scientific explanation for the diversity of life still standing.
1 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
William Burt's argument against windmills raised some interesting points. "It would be shameful to destroy part of our 200-year heritage for the sake of building another symbol of our overconsumption" How about a trade? We close down some coal-fired power plants, reforest them and reclaim them as parks (like Theodore Roosevelt National Park), then build some wind turbines to replace the lost energy generation?
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re. Letters June 24/08. Obama wants to be President so bad that he has accepted illegal money from the Chinese, which explains the current flood of Chinese and Far East immigrants in the U.S., taking American jobs, ruining our economy, and don't be surprised if they already vote!
1 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
to 12:11, how come your not gripping about the taxpayer bailouts for wallstreet and the huge amounts of money being stolen daily in the wars. crawl into your hole and the hell with your fellow man.
1 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: Standing up against the rhetoric Good for Fields! Glad to see there are young people in Chevy Chase of all places who don't pick up pom-poms for a candidate just because of being a "D" or "R" without really investigating where they come from and what they stand for. Kudos to you Mr. Fields!
5 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Comrade David Edwards has decided that there should be a limit on the number of SUVS allowed per household. Should we expect searches of homes for illegal SUVs (exceeding the proper quota) and what should be the punishment for transgressors?
2 agree | 1 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
D.C. needs to "fully fund year-round pre-K and kindergarten, after-school and full-time summer programs..." Classic liberal cradle-to-grave coverage. Let's add fulltime nannies, free babysitting, and whatever else taxpayers can fund to take responsibility off the "parents" who create the children.
3 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Hats off to Mrs. Peterson for telling the truth because these people are devious, will lie to get what they want and are operating from the "dark side". Our children have nothing to do with their nebulous agenda. This is most unfortunate. The author will certainly be supported by thousands of teachers! Please carry on!
3 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How anyone could conclude allowing illegal immigrants to help US companies meet their labor needs is a "high-minded and noble" effort in the face out an out of control situation is delusional and part of the problem.
8 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Matt Nerzig, Spokesman SEIU Local 32BJ said:
Thanks Jerome for your letter. Never mind my so-called "illusions," we can discuss that off-line. More importantkly, anyone who feels our immigration system is not broken is suffering from delusions. Denying this universally-accepted view, and its impact on our struggling economy, flies in the face of reality. Sticking our heads in the sand rather facing up to the problems this immigration crisis creates for our economy get us no closer to a solution. If its "high-minded and noble" to help US companies meet their demands for labor that at the same time safeguards the men and women willing to work these jobs, I'll take that (union) label.
5 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The point people miss the most is that Reverand Wright calls himself a preacher of Gods word, Is this the sort of surmon that you want your pastor discussing. Obama called him a friend, mentor, "Spiritual Advisor" and my pastor. Suppose Obama did not personally attend a surmon while this sort of preaching took place. As publically well know Wright appears to have been in the Chicago area it's hard to believe any member of his church with such a close relationship to his pastor would not have at a minimum been aware of his ranting. Somethings in life you have no choice but the church you attend does not fall into that catagory. By tolerating these views it demonstrates the poor judgement and character Obama owns.
5 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Don’t judge Obama by Rev. Wright’s words - No I won't judge Obama by Mr. Wright's words. I judge Obama by his judgement to stick to his pastor for such a long time. Why did Obama associate himself with Jeremiah Wright? By associating himself with Wright Obama did damage. If my pastor said something like that, I would walk away. All he had to do was walk away but nooooo... Obama was clapping and dancing inside the church! So I don’t judge Obama by Rev. Wright’s words, I judge Obama by his own conduct and that is sticking by his man.
5 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
From someone who shot someone with their sons gun...check your facts Carl.Good thing he was FBI.
8 agree | 7 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's around 22 million not billion.
15 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The USA uses 22 Billion barrels of oil a day, The Alaskan oil reserve would last 1/2 of a day.
11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re "Obama’s remark was more nuanced than skin color", 21 April - Wow, what an angry writer. Here's a news flash - There is no such thing as "a typical WASP".
11 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Jason Durda said:
This is a great piece. I agree wholeheartedly. Amit Singh is really a fresh face into the Republican Party of Northern Virginia.
13 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr said:
What Mandy Stoltzfus and others seems to overlook is that people in small town America who have seen their jobs evaporate or get shipped overseas have good reason to be bitter, especially when their national government does little or nothing to help them. Sen. Obama has admitted that his choice of words might not have been the best, but he was right in pointing to the bitterness of those whose very survival is in jeopardy.
12 agree | 12 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Prince William absolutely did the right thing. Illegal aliens are a social and economic drain on America and they must be encouraged to leave and go back to their home countries. If they want to come back legally, then great, we will welocme you back! But our society simply cannot abide the MILLIONS of people coming here un-checked and then violating our laws and cultural norms. That is not how American society is run, and our labor and uimmigration laws are designed to protect Americans from this unjust, and inhumane foreign invasion. HELP SAVE MARYLAND everybody!
14 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Paul said:
Mr. Botwin is absolutely correct when he says that Prince William citizens will be better off in the long run should all the illegal aliens leave. The people who profit from illegal aliens -- greedy businesses, corrupt real estate developers and poverty pimps like NCIC -- are picking the pockets of ordinary tax-payers. Illegal immigration has facilitated the greatest wealth-redistribution event in US history, enriching the upper class at the expense of lower and middle class workers.
13 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr said:
Re my April 7 "Six years of war in Iraq must end" letter, I wrote that the war has injured 30,000 young American service members. Former Sen. John Edwards, however, has noted that the actual figure is 60,645 and rising. Further, I left out the large number of returned Iraq veterans who are jobless, homeless, and not getting adequate medical care. Let's "support our troops" by giving them a new G.I. Bill and adequate health care and by bringing them home.
10 agree | 13 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "Tax credit won't cover steep rise in prices" We don't just need another Boston Tea Party. We need a general revolution. Won't happen, though. Voters are so lazy or self-centered, they keep putting the same losers/crooks back in office.
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: six years of war in Iraq must end The comparisons are totally skewed. And please, stop parroting Obama's total lie about the "100 years". Enough already.
9 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The Metro system (while maintenance was done and no eating was still enforced) was good by U.S. standards. The fact is that all U.S. transportation systems are pathetic compared with those in other parts of the world.One small example - a high speed train from DC to Boston would relieve much air congestion. Why are so many way ahead of us?
10 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Robin Ficker Broker Robin Realty said:
I said in the 2008 campaign for County Executive that, "A Vote for Ike Leggett is a Vote to Raise Your Own Taxes." How true! Now he is giving us the largest property tax increase in 20 years and he will not commit to sticking to the charter property tax limit in the two years after this one either.
10 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re term limits Unfortunately, terms limits may be necessary, because our politicians have subverted our constitutional system to their own benefit and greed.
12 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re hypocritical Edwards letter, 18 March Whom a politician endorses has nothing to do with past statements and everything to do with self-serving interests. If H.Clinton offers Edwards the attorney generalship,he'll be with her. Edwards a hypocrite? What a shock!
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "Only states are entitled to an armed militia" This is a complete misreading of the 2d amendment. The right to bear arms has nothing to do with living in a state, and the 2d amendment says nothing like "only states are entitled to an armed militia".
11 agree | 9 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Home prices rose ridiclously in Prince William and were dropping long before the Resolution was first enforced on Mar 3, 2008. So to think that the Illegal Resolution was the catalyst is patently absurd and downright apologistic. Chris Cummings
9 agree | 11 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: no immunity for snooping telecoms The boogy man is not coming to get anyone, unless you have a connection to a jihadist. If we don't get the information and warnings we need to stay ahead of these people, there will be no remaining years to live out.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I saw abandoned houses in Prince William County trading at 50 cents on the dollar, while surrounding jurisdictions — which are not driving out immigrants — were selling in the range of 25 to 30 percent off peak price. Nobody is "driving out immigrants". There's one word missing in your remark.. It's always left out in the lefty argument. The word.....come on, you know it.....that's right....ILLEGAL. Illegal Immigrants.
11 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Using Change from Welfare Tax Dollars said:
"I find it incomprehensible why my tax dollars should help someone who has the money to buy drugs."... If a welfare recipient uses tax dollars to buy food, shelter and medicine, what do they do with the "change"? In other words, tax dollars can be used to handle basic needs, but we cannot reasonably expect those same welfare recipients to not buy a one-dollar lottery ticket, candy bar, or beer bottle. Our focus should be on ensuring the poor's basic needs, not scolding them for occassionally indulging themselves with pocket change. If drug treatment is needed, then help them fight it. Maybe they'll switch to a less expensive habit, like alcohol and other junk food.
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "no more taxes to fix county's shortfall" - The fault lies with voters, who keep electing these spendthrifts. The way to say “no” is to boot them out of office.
9 agree | 10 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Isn't it ironic, the New York Times, which seeks to coddle illegal immigrants, finds something wrong with McCain's legal status. Oh, and by the way, NYT endorsed McCain! The true test of whether a newspaper means it about papers not being important is to try to get into their office building without identification. Good luck.
9 agree | 8 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re:"Required drug tests would undermine welfare program" I am very willing to help someone with food and shelter. I find it incomprehensible why my tax dollars should help someone who has the money to buy drugs.
27 agree | 23 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Trying to accomplish something, is better than not trying at all.
40 agree | 52 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: "McCain’s eligibility to be president may be in doubt", letter 27 February My head is spinning. McCain is a natural-born citizen. He was a “citizen at birth” because his parents were American citizens. If you are born on an American military base overseas, and your parents are not American citizens, you are not granted citizenship. But it would be a shock to the many children of military stationed overseas that their citizenship is in question. That wouldn’t help military recruiting, would it? The case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark involved two parents who were not US citizens, and a child born in the US. It dealt with the constitutionality of the Chinese Exclusion Act. I fail to see any relevance to McCain. Democrats fight for a patriotic image. Clinton and Obama raising this would make them a laughingstock.
51 agree | 50 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
re: Letters: February 26, 2008 - As usual, the issue is being obscurred. If DC soccer fans deserve a stadium, let them, and the businesses that will benefit, pay for it.
42 agree | 46 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am glad you are an advocate for children. I personally do not care if the schools is public or charter as long as our children acheive and benefit from the education they recieve. However it is untrue that Charter schools outperform public schools. Greatschools.com will give you a list of schools public or charter test scores. If one wants true data check out the site. Also some of the charters org. only administer their own test which makes comparison mute. Charter org. need not downplay public schools to make a name for themseleves or to prove their worth. Proof is in the pudding and the pudding tells me public and charter schools in DC have lots of room for improvement. Once again visit greatschools.com and get infomation from an independent source.
63 agree | 56 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Edd Doerr claims that "public schools are required to be neutral to religion." Then how is it that in Florida a public school, a kindergarten girl was expelled for praying over her lunch. She was warned once for praying aloud over lunch, so on the day she was hauled to the principal and expelled, she was caught praying quietly to herself. Doerr lies.
54 agree | 106 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Edd Doerr said:
So DC taxpayers will have to cough up a billion dollars for baseball and soccer stadiums and infrastructure upgrades! Stadiums that only a minority of DC residents will likely ever enter! Wouldn't DC residents benefit a great deal more if that billion were spent on upgrading pre-K through university public education and public health measures? Where are the city's (colony's) priorities?
58 agree | 51 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re; "DC should have blocked porn sites" - The idea that adult employees think that whatever is accessible on their computers is okay, and taxpayers must pay to block sites that aren't, reminds me of a parent blocking TV channels to protect their children. Give me a break. I used computers for decades with the federal government. The rule was no personal use of the computers. We understood, too, that we were being paid to do a job, not to entertain ourselves on the computer, no matter what sites were accessed. The union response to this issue sends the message that we need to leave nothing to the discretion of the immature employee. Reminds me of preschool.
59 agree | 59 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
This is a rather saucy statement: "Many people say that the Electoral College doesn’t matter anymore. These people are misinformed or politically motivated." In Presidential races, if the Electoral College is abolished, then a vote is a vote. I would like to propose the idea that if this were a reality, it would make rural voters just as important as everyone else! Democrats in Kansas will have just as much power as Republicans living in the District - their vote won’t be thrown away when their 'state' pledges all of its delegates to the winning candidate statewide! The system we have now makes only a handful of states relevant, therefore that is where the candidates go; Florida, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Missouri and the likes are really the ones 'deciding' the president. Most other states are ignored on the campaign trail because they are deemed likely to, and do, go for a certain candidate well before November.
79 agree | 68 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Re: What's wrong with earmarks? Answer:plenty. Earmarks are as corrupt as any other kind of payoff. They are, pure and simple, a way to buy votes. Legislation should be simple - put up a bill, vote it up or down and move on. No riders, no earmarks. That gives advantage to no one. It won't happen, of course. Straightforwardness and honesty are too simple a concept for politicians to grasp.
83 agree | 99 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree