
|
Los Angeles City Guides
|
Article History
WASHINGTON (Map, News) - The income gap between the wealthiest and poorest families in D.C., Virginia and Maryland drastically widened during the last quarter-century, echoing growing financial disparities nationwide, according to a new analysis by the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
The households in the top 5 percent in the District have annual incomes that are more than 26 times that of the bottom 20 percent, the study showed. D.C. was not ranked against states in the report, but if it were, it would top the list of states with the largest income gap, followed by New York.
Maryland had some of the most sizable gains in the country in its income gap.
According to the center, Maryland families at the top 5 percent of the earnings scale now make 12.3 times as much as the poorest 20 percent of families.
In the United States as a whole, the wealthiest have an average income more than seven times greater than the lowest-earning households.
“The top group has disproportionately been helped by the expansion of the economy while middle-class and working people have really just barely beaten inflation,” said Neil Bergsman, director of the Maryland Budget and Tax Policy Institute.
Although the just-released analysis does not break data down to a county level, Bergsman said the effects are particularly being felt in Montgomery County, where the richest and, increasingly, the poorest citizens are concentrating due to the nature of job offerings in the area.
Bergsman said the statistics point to a desperate need for the state to streamline and extend unemployment insurance as well as keep support programs in place even as officials struggle to balance the budget.
In Virginia, the income divide also is becoming more pronounced, experts told The Examiner. According to the report, the state’s gap is the 11th-largest in the nation.
This shift is being caused by the accumulation of wealth in places such as Loudoun and Fairfax counties, which last year had the first- and second-highest median incomes nationally.
Elizabeth McNichol, a senior fellow at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, said families at the top of the earnings picture are excelling financially because of growth in the stock market. Meanwhile a surge in generally lower-paying, service-sector jobs are accounting for the swing on the other end.
“It’s disturbing because we’re on the brink of a recession, and those families will be poorly prepared to weather that storm,” she said.
dlevitz@dcexaminer.com
Not ranked |
EMAIL ME THIS STORY |
ARTICLE HISTORY |
Sports
Business |
Real Estate Family Movies and Books Venues, Sports and Music Concerts, Artists and Tickets Be Inspired - Quotes and Stories |
Comments from Examiner Readers
6:22 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008 re: "Local divide between richest and poorest grows"
Report as inappropriate
12:52 PM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007
re: "Report highlights the poor in wealthy Fairfax Co."
Report as inappropriate
8:22 AM MST on Thu., May. 24, 2007
re: "Report highlights the poor in wealthy Fairfax Co."
Report as inappropriate
10:02 AM MST on Wed., May. 23, 2007
re: "Report highlights the poor in wealthy Fairfax Co."
Report as inappropriate
Conscious Reader said:
I don't get this...After I pay my mortgage, my pimp - BGE, and all my other bills (I cut off cable, went to a single line for my alarm system, cut out dining out as much...heck, trying to learn to cut my own hair!), I still don't have enough! I am so scared that next year my income will rise a little and the IRS will be saying I owe. I make 60K, but in this area, that isn't a lot...I can't imagine how people are making it with less. Are all these people in this area just "pretending" to be doing good? Is it really all just smoke and mirrors? This is stressful, I mean, what is the value of working to get into the middle class, if you still feel poor?
4 agree | 2 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It isn't just that a lot of people live below the poverty line. Rather, it is that a lot of people we don't recognize as not having enough simply don't have enough to meet their most simply defined needs. There is no fluff in the Self Sufficiency Standard budget. And when one looks at the number and the percentage of our children who live in families without sufficient income to meet all the bare basics, one begins to understand: stress, no entertainment, no funds for a good vacuum cleaner, no savings, no extracurriculars, no meals out, no backpacks, no cable TV, no frills, no debt repayment. Parents working full time, commuting by public transportation or struggling to keep an older car on the road. An apartment that may be far from the bus. And teachers wonder why these kids struggle? But we're looking for solutions in the wrong places. The problem is a basic structural one. Read Henry George's Progess and Poverty (see .org) or wealthandwant dot com for how to solve it.
130 agree | 131 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The article is a fine example of the many definitions of the word "poverty". There is the dictionary one, the federally defined one and, in this case, a "self-sufficiency standard". That standard says that in order to lead the life-style of households averaging $94,610 in income a defined family needs $62,918.
133 agree | 129 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
How much of this problem relates to illegal immigration? Certainly not all, but it's likely to be a significant contributing factor.
119 agree | 125 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree