Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
In the second day of the racketeering trial against Deborah Jean Palfrey, a handful of the government’s witnesses talked about how they used the escort service and mailed the money to Palfrey in California for arranging the liaisons.
The women and their clients said they had sex during nearly every meeting, but under cross-examination they admitted that Palfrey, 52, never directly told them to have sex.
“I was told to talk to them, make them feel better and what will be, will be,” said Andrea Detty, 30, of Great Falls, Va., who worked for Palfrey for about two months. “She never asked; I never told.”
Most of the witnesses were granted immunity from prosecution. The women were soft-spoken; the clients, both lawyers, were talkative.
The call girls and customers said they learned about the business, Pamela Martin and Associates, through an advertisement in the Yellow Pages. New recruits sent cover letters and photos of themselves and were told to meet with a client to see if the woman was suitable for the job.
Customers were given a menu of women and what they looked like. The girls would meet the men for up to an hour-and-a-half for $250. The women said they got paid whether they had sex or not.
Sharon King, 40, of Leesburg, said she had sex with 79 of the 80 men she was set up with during the six months she worked for Palfrey.
“This was a criminal enterprise. We knew why we were there,” King said.
One woman, a 46-year-old mother of three, testified that she went on six appointments but never had sex with the men. She said Palfrey told her that the business offered companionship. She quit after a man asked her for oral sex.
Palfrey called her “a nitwit,” she said.
Paul Huang, a 44-year-old lawyer from Rockville, said he used the service about a 100 times. On the two occasions when he did not have sex with the girls, Huang said, he did not pay Palfrey.
“She provided a service, and I was a customer of her service, a good customer,” he said. “It was great.”
smccabe@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
7:54 AM MST on Wed., May. 21, 2008 re: "‘D.C. Madam’ notes say suicide was only way out"
Report as inappropriate
2:41 PM MST on Wed., May. 7, 2008
re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"
Report as inappropriate
2:02 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
1:00 PM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "One of Palfrey’s former employees died by her own hand"
Report as inappropriate
5:01 AM MST on Fri., May. 2, 2008
re: "‘D.C. Madam’ allegedly dies by suicide in Fla."
Report as inappropriate
1:47 PM MST on Wed., Apr. 23, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
10:41 AM MST on Fri., Apr. 11, 2008
re: "Naval officer faces dismissal after testifying in madam trial"
Report as inappropriate
9:16 AM MST on Thu., Apr. 10, 2008
re: "Former escorts, clients detail liaisons in D.C. Madam case"
Report as inappropriate
Brenda from England said:
The US Government psychologically tortured Deborah Jeane Palfrey to the point of suicide, (in other words to the point of murder). From an international human rights point of view she was totally innocent. Why did the US Government do such a thing to her? So they could steal her assets and life savings and claim everything was done legally. Deborah worked hard for her money, she was an intelligent, successful and hard working business woman. In her 52 years of existence she never hurt one soul, she was a sweet and beautiful person. Every single government official involved with her case (or torture) have her blood on their hands. The US government basically murdered her just so they could steal her money. Only a very cruel government could do such a thing. (Deborah - I as a fellow human being love and respect you with all my heart, I know you were innocent just like Jesus was innocent of all charges brought upon him before he was crucified - God bless your soul).
1 agree | 6 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Palfrey was a woman who made selfish choices til the end.She profited from a business which hurt innocent women(wives)and children via their louse husbands/fathers.How many wives have been devastated... caught STDs? How many children have been scared and confused by marital discord/divorce? Her note was remorseless and all about her..."I can't be incarcerated...I'll be in my late 50's...penniless...I was the victim of a public lynching..."I,I,I".She even hung herself on her mother's property:SELFISH! She chose illegal activity and devalued marriage that is why she was enroute to prison and "alone". The former escort who commented contradicts herself by stating that she hadn't been proud of that time in her life,but goes on to justify it because it is between consenting adults,she needed money etc.Some serious soul searching may be beneficial.She would probably never assault an unsuspecting mother and child.But in a sense,she has done just that.
1 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
It's sad for anyone to end their life in such a manner. As for the so called western culture, sex outside of marriage is an abonination to God. Have you not heard that the wages of sin is death!
2 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
She did what she thought was best at the day and time.
4 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
reader said:
She didn't have a choice .
6 agree | 3 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
I am one of Palfrey's former escorts. I did not testify in the hearings though. That period of my life is one I'm not proud of, but it got me through some pretty rough financial times. Personally I don't get why it's illegal. It was concentual and safe, and "Julia" (aka Deborah) took good care of us. I worked there 6 weeks and made well over $10,000. Paul Huang, mentioned in this article, was one of my most frequent clients. In fact he was one of two who knew my real name.
7 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
She made a choice. Now she has defined herself.
6 agree | 4 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
Sorry icant understand this western hypocrisy!If having sex is not outlawed then money mustnt be the question ?I know you cant concieve this either!What about single mothers and guy hords?Iassume the western values are decaying and you wont accept !!
5 agree | 5 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree